Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.
  • Log In
  • Register
CEEOL Logo
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • SUBJECT AREAS
  • PUBLISHERS
  • JOURNALS
  • eBooks
  • GREY LITERATURE
  • CEEOL-DIGITS
  • INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT
  • Help
  • Contact
  • for LIBRARIANS
  • for PUBLISHERS

Content Type

Subjects

Languages

Legend

  • Journal
  • Article
  • Book
  • Chapter
  • Open Access
  • Theology and Religion
  • Islam studies
  • History of Islam

We kindly inform you that, as long as the subject affiliation of our 300.000+ articles is in progress, you might get unsufficient or no results on your third level or second level search. In this case, please broaden your search criteria.

Result 101-120 of 740
  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • ...
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • Next
Vatikan Kütüphanesi’ndeki Kur’ân Elyazmaları Üzerine Biçim ve İçerik Açısından Bir Araştırma

Vatikan Kütüphanesi’ndeki Kur’ân Elyazmaları Üzerine Biçim ve İçerik Açısından Bir Araştırma

Author(s): Esra Gözeler / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 3/2017

The history of the Qurʾānic text begins with the time of its revelation. The research on the Qurʾānic manuscripts is one of the main fields of textual studies of the Qurʾān. There have been many works done by both Muslim and Western scholars. Many museums and libraries around the world hold Qurʾān manuscripts. Each manuscript has its own characteristics such as orthography, calligraphy, decoration, and binding, number of the pages and the lines, and its dating. This article deals with 110 Qurʾān manuscripts found in the Vatican Library (Biblioteca Apostalica Vaticana) at the Vaticani arabi, Borgiani arabi, Barberiniani orientali ve Rossiani Collections. The dates of these Qurʾān manuscripts vary from 1/7th (?) and 13/19th centuries. The article aims to identify the features of Qurʾānic writing by studying chronologically some basic physical-content descriptions and characteristics of these manuscripts. It also examines the different names of the sūrahs and the knowledge on Meccan or Medinan sūrahs presented on the sūrah headings of manuscripts. Summary: Each Qurʾān manuscript has its own characteristics. These features present significant insights into the field of history of Qurʾānic text. A manuscript becomes a source for the history of writing muṣḥaf in terms of physical and content features such as calligraphy, ink colors, binding, and explanations found in kataba page, the sūrah headings which contain the names of sūrahs, Meccan-Medinan knowledge, the numbers of āyahs, and the signs for juzʾ, ʿashr, ḥizb. The research on the names of sūrahs, Meccan-Medinan knowledge, and the number of āyahs contributes to the ʿulūm al-Qurʾān studies as well. This article examines 110 Qur’an manuscripts located in the Vatican Library in the Vaticani arabi (73 MSS), Borgiani arabi (25 MSS), Barberiniani orientali (11 MSS), and Rossiani (2 MSS) collections. Each manuscript is individually studied. However, due to the limitation of the article, I include only some basic and significant physical and content features of these manuscripts. The catalogues prepared by Giorgio Levi della Vida (1886-1967) and Carlo Alberto Anzuini, are consulted for this study. I also study the sūrah headings which contain the names of sūrahs and Meccan-Medinan knowledge. The most used calligraphy types of these manuscripts coming from different geographies are maghribī (19 MSS) ve nasikh-Ottoman (66 MSS). The basic features of maghribī MSS as follows: The text is written dark brown, vowel signs in dark red, shadda and jazm in blue, and hamza in orange ink (6-7/12-13th centuries). The āyah endings are in circle form and decorated (6-7/12-13th centuries). The same characteristics can be seen in the next centuries (8/14th and 9/15th centuries). The word sajdah is written in the same line with the sajdah ayah in Borg. Ar. 51 (6-7/12-13th centuries). The main characteristics of nasikh-Ottoman MSS as follows: Vat. Ar. 195 (9/15th century) includes the āyah endings in two different figures: three dots in triangle-shaped in red ink or in inverse comma-formed (٬). The numbers of the āyahs are not written in this manuscript. On the other hand, the earlier features of the present muṣḥafs found in this manuscript as follows: Waqf signs are in red ink; the word sajdah is written in the same line with the sajdah āyah in black ink. The word ḥizb is in the margin of the pages. The sūrah headings hold the name of the sūrah, Meccan-Medinan knowledge, and the numbers of āyahs. The taʿqība word is at the end of the pages. Among these manuscripts, Barb. Or. 72 contains, for the first time, the prayer text after the reading the whole Qur’an (ḥatm) at the end of the muṣḥaf. This manuscript has different explanations for the Meccan and Medinan knowledge. It uses “نزلت بمكة” for “مكية”, and “نزلت بالمدينة” for “مدنية”. The figures of juzʾ are written in numerical form in Borg. Ar. 184. The divisions such as “ربع حزب, نصف حزب” can be seen in the manuscripts in 12/18th centuries. The names of the sūrah in the sūrah headings can be different from their widely-known names. The 39 sūrahs have different names among the manuscripts examined in this article. The names of sūrahs which cannot be found in the relevant classical source as follows: al-khalīl for Sūrah Ibrāhīm; al-kharīr for Sūrah al-Sajdah; al-sayyāḥūn for Sūrah Sabaʾ; jādala for Sūrah Mucādala; al-ʿishār for Sūrah al-Takwīr; wa’l-layli iẕā yaghshā for Sūrah al-Shams; lumeze for Sūrah al-Humaza; miskīn for Sūrah al-Māʿūn; asrā for Sūrah al-Isrāʾ; al-maqābir and al-qabr for Sūrah al-Takas̠ur; salāsilā for Sūrah al-Insān; al-abrār for al-Muṭaffifīn. The sūrah headings indicate the knowledge of Meccan-Medinan classification of the sūrahs. Each manuscript does not have this feature. However, the manuscripts have this feature may not include this knowledge for each sūrah headings. The disagreements about the Meccan or Medinan sūrahs in the ʿulūm al-Qurʾān literature can be seen in the manuscripts studied in this article. The manuscripts which have this knowledge present that the 47 sūrahs recorded only as Meccan, but the remaining ones both Meccan and Medinan. These manuscripts do not record a sūrah only as Medinan. There is, therefore, more disagreements about if a Medinan sura is Medinan or not. There are manuscripts which present more detailed knowledge on Meccan-Medinan. Vat. Ar. 1484 (9/15th century) mentions not only whether a sūrah is Meccan or Medinan but also the exceptional verses if the sūrah has. For instance, the heading of Sūrah al-Anʿām reads that: “سورة الانعام نزلت جملة واحدة بمكة الا ثلث ايات انزلت بالمدينة قوله قل تعالوا أتل ما حرم ربكم عليكم لعلكم تتقون”. Among the sūrah headings which have this feature are al-Naḥl, al-Ḥajj, al-Shuʿarā, Luqmān, al-Sajdah, and al-Zumar. Vat. Ar. 1588 mentions only the numbers of exceptional verses. For example, the heading of Sūrah al-Isrāʾ says that “مكية و قيل مدنية غير ثلث ايات”. Vat. Ar. 1597 contains details about the numbers of ayahs, words, and letters in the sūrah headings. For instance, for Sūrah al-Nisāʾ, it reads that “اياتها ق ع اختلافها ب كلماتهاغج ذ م ه حروفها غيول”. The Arabic letters in this explanation has a numerical value (abjad). According to this the number of āyahs is 170, the number of debated ones in merging with the previous and next verses is 2, the number of words 3.745, and the number of letters is 16.030. There are corrections on the pages of the manuscripts. These corrections may be done through the writing process or during the check reading (muqabala) at the end of the writing. The writing of the text by heart and by looking to the other copy, and the similarities may cause these kinds of errors for the copyist. Studying on the Qurʾān manuscripts reveals the different features of the writing of a muṣḥaf. Even though the numbers of the graduate studies gradually increase in Turkey, there is no a PhD dissertation which analyzes a Qurʾān manuscript, and a master thesis has been recently completed. Therefore, establishing graduate courses in the field of Islamic studies will strengthen Qurʾān and tafsīr studies.

More...
Lala Mustafa-paša – Kliški sandžakbeg i vakif džamije u Livnu?

Lala Mustafa-paša – Kliški sandžakbeg i vakif džamije u Livnu?

Author(s): Fazileta Hafizović / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 66/2017

One of the members of the Sokolović family who reached the most senior positions in the Ottoman state and who probably never returned to his homeland once he left for Istanbul was Lala Mustafa Pasha Sokolović. Our historiography has accepted the claim that he was the administrator of the sanjak of Klis in the period 1574-1577, and that in Livno, the unofficial centre of the sanjak, he commissioned a mosque, ascribe to him almost from the time of construction. Using primary sources, this paper demonstrates that none of these claims are true.

More...
MEVLUD IZMEĐU LIJEPOG OBIČAJA (SUNNETUN HASENETUN) I ZABRANJENE NOVOTARIJE (BIDA'TUN SEJJIETUN)

MEVLUD IZMEĐU LIJEPOG OBIČAJA (SUNNETUN HASENETUN) I ZABRANJENE NOVOTARIJE (BIDA'TUN SEJJIETUN)

Author(s): Muharem Štulanović / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 8/2016

In the Muslim tradition, month of Rabi'al-Awwal has been devoted to remebrance and memory of the prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, through special programs, or so called Al-Mawlids every year. Each year with the arrival of the month Rabi'al-Awwal, in which Muhammad, peace be upon him, was born, we have legal Shariah discussions over the issue of marking and celebrating the birthday of Muhammad, through organizing celebrations of Al-Mawlid. Orthodox, puritanistic scholars state that Al-Mawlid is a forbidden, ugly novelty and innovation in religion (AlBid'ah Al-Sajjiah), which was invented as a festival day because of blind imitation of others, like Christians, nonbelievers etc. The other, contemporary scholars have an opinion that Al-Mawlid is a good and commendable act (AlSunnah Al-Hasanah) which has its justification and is applied through the practice and achievemnt of certain permissible forms of worship, such as recitation of the Quran, sending salutations and blessings upon Muhammad, peace be upon him, reciting prayers and dhikr and a reminder about the Seerah, ie. biography of Muhammad, peace be upon him, through religious lectures, speeches, etc. In modern terms, this event can be used in our mosques and community in educational and missionary purposes, as an expression of love for Allah's Messenger, and as a tradition and custom of modern memory and remembrance of Allah's Messenger, his teaching and his mission. Al-Mawlid should not to be taken as a religious, ceremonial event, which is unfortunately often the case in practice.

More...
KUR'AN KAO IZVOR PRAVNE NAUKE

KUR'AN KAO IZVOR PRAVNE NAUKE

Author(s): Haris Veladžić / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 8/2016

The Qur'an, as the last divine revelation, contains regulations relating to all aspects of human life and as such is a basic, fundamental source of all disciplines from the corpus of Islamic sciences. This work aims to present the Qur'an as the basic source of Islamic jurisprudence, without neglecting other segments of the last divine revelation. Although the Qur'an is not a legal document, but rather a Book of religious and moral principles and incentives, it nevertheless contains a number of legal statements. Qur'anic principles pertaining to civil, criminal, domestic, international and other areas of law are presented in five hundred verses which have legal form. This work has through examples exhibited the most significant methodological procedures used by the Qur'an in standardizing its legislation: the methods of principle, the summary and detailed norms. Also, this work mentions the most important Qur'anic styles which the Qur'an uses in explaining its legal regulations.

More...
XIX. Yüzyıl Osmanlı Toplumunda Sosyo-Ekonomik Değişim Süreci ve Tarikatlar

XIX. Yüzyıl Osmanlı Toplumunda Sosyo-Ekonomik Değişim Süreci ve Tarikatlar

Author(s): Zekeriya Işık / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 2/2015

The Ottoman Empire entered to XIX. century with the heavy pressure of the rapidly developing issues of modernization and industrialization in Europe besides historical problems that have accumulated so far. Modernization, pointed to a number of components, envisaged with traditional organizations are identified with religion and culture, and secular institutions and rules rather than new production mechanisms. Particularly in this context, Ottoman modernization chose either a radical way of liquidation especially on administrative and political structure, all socio-economic and socio-cultural structures or this is not possible, it aimed to achieve envisaged changes and transforms by building, the new besides the former by dualistic understanding. The religious orders which have tissue of autonomus organization, and also have ontological and ideological conception have taken their share from these developments. Since Ottoman classical age, especially generalising foundation-lodge model, the orders that were adapted to the system by socializing quickly in a number of ways, at this time it has been intended that they have had to adapt modern, secular, capitalist society understanding or they have had to be pushed out of the system by liquidation. Here this study is prepared with the aim of describing the process of socio-economic changes of religious orders against the repression of modernization, centralization, capitalisation

More...
ŠI'IJE I SUNIJE - U PERCEPCIJI PROF. IHSAN ILAHI ZAHIRA

ŠI'IJE I SUNIJE - U PERCEPCIJI PROF. IHSAN ILAHI ZAHIRA

Author(s): Fuad Sedić / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 4/2011

Any conversation about the state of Muhammad's, peace be upon him, Ummah, their weakness after the progress and the leading role in humanity which they held for so many years, inevitably entails a discussion on its disunity which we all see. Unavoidable point in the divisions of Muslims into the various factions and groups are certainly the Shia Muslims, which are the followers of Ali and his family. Particularly important is the fact that they were the first who started to forge and spread the false Hadiths. Even worse than that is the belief of one part of the Shia that the Qur'an is defective and incomplete,although the Qur'an has been narrated with the method of Tawatur. This paper attempts to illuminate at least to some extent this side of their ideology in the perception of prof. Ihsan Ilahi Zahir, a former Pakistani scholar, who has devoted most of his works to this issue in the Islamic community.

More...
Zerkeşî ve et-Tezkire fi’l-Ehâdîsi’l-Müştehira İsimli Eserinde Rivayetleri Değerlendirme Yöntemi

Zerkeşî ve et-Tezkire fi’l-Ehâdîsi’l-Müştehira İsimli Eserinde Rivayetleri Değerlendirme Yöntemi

Author(s): Muhammed Akdoğan / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 1/2018

al-Zarkashī, an ethnic Turk, is an important hadith, fiqh and commentary scholar who lived during the Mamlūks period. He was taught by some of the leading scholars of his era, such as Alā al-Dīn Mughultay (d. 762/1360), Imād al-Dīn Ibn Kashīr (d. 774/1372) ve Jamal al-Dīn al-Asnawī (d. 772/1370), and he grew up under their mentorship. Nevertheless, his only well-known student is Birmāvī (d. 831/1428). Almost half of his works have been related to fiqh and methodology of fiqh, and he has also written some important works in the field of hadith. Among these, especially al-Tadhkira, al-Nukat alā Ibn al-Salāh, al-Nukat alā al-Umda fī al-Ahkām ve al-Icāba are worthy of mention. The work named al-Tadhkira, which we built our work upon, is the first known work to have been preserved in the field. Due to his being a first in his field, he was vastly studied as to how he evaluated the narrations and what kind of procedure he followed. In this work of his, not only the criticism but also the application of the text criticism adds to the importance of the work. Then, on the basis of this work, scholars such as al-Sakhāwī and al-Aclūnī made complementary works on the same subject.Summary: It is inevitable for a person to be shaped by the society he lives in. During the time when al-Zarkashī lived, Egypt was under the rule of the Mamlūks. The history of Mamlūks is examined under two periods: 1. Bahrī or Turkish Mamlūks (745 / 1344 - 794-1391) 2. Burjī or Circassian Mamlūks (784 / 1382 - 923 / 1517) period. Our author lives in both periods. About forty years of his life was in the period of Bahrī and the rest was in the period of Burjī. In both periods, the state did not have a full political authority in the country, but this was not the case in education and training. In fact, on the contrary to the political situation, scientific activities have accelerated by the arrival of many scholars to the land of Mamlūk because of the Mongol invasions coming from the east and the Crusades from the west. The increase of scientific activity was caused not only by the coming of the scholars but also by the support given by the Mamlūk sultans. In fact, they built many new madrasas in addition to the resurrection of the old ones. In addition to madrasas during the Mamlūks period, mosque, hāngāh, ribat and zāwiya are also among the educational places.Hadith, fiqh and Tafsir scholar al-Zarkashī is originally Turkish. He was born in Cairo at 745 under the conditions mentioned above. His family learned of gold and silverworking because of their subsequent settlement to Egypt, and they made their living with this craft. A person who performs this is called Zarkash in Arabic. Muhammad ibn Bahādır, who learned and did this job, was known as al-Zarkashī. al-Zarkashī, known for his love of science since childhood, was trained hadith by Alā al-Dīn Mughultay (d. 762/1360) and Imād al-Dīn Ibn Kashīr (d. 774/1372) in Damascus, and fiqh by al-Asnawī (d. 772/1370). Among his beneficiaries are distinguished personalities such as al-Subkī (d. 756/1355), al-Azraī (d. 783/1381) and al-Bulqīnī (d. 824/1421). The most remarkable of his student is al-Birmāvī (d. 831/1428).It is known that he wrote about fifty works in hadith, tafsir, fiqh, methodology of fiqh and other fields. Especially among these works al-Burhān fī ʻUlūm al-Qur’ān, al-Tadhkira, al-Ijāba, al-Bahr al-Muhīt fî Usūl al-Fiqh ve al-Mansūr fī al-Qawāid is worth mentioning. Studies on al-Burhān and al-Bahr were carried out at the level of Master and PhD.al-Zarkashī did not hesitate to criticize any person for whom he had found his mistake. For example, even though he has a great love for him, and even because of this love, he has been given the name of al-Minhāj, the criticism of al-Nawawī is the clearest indication of the value given to science. Not just him, critics of scholars such as al-Hākim al-Naysābūrī and Ibn ʻAbd al-Barr who are recognized as authority in hadith can also be considered in this framework.The work named al-Tadhkira which we have studied in our work is of importance in that it shows the accumulation of knowledge in the field of hadith. In order to compose this work, it is necessary to have enough information in this field since the riwāyas must be criticized in terms of isnād and text. To compose his work, al-Zarkashī has benefited from about a hundred and forty works related to hadith, tafsir, al-siyar, history, tabakāt, commentary, jarh - taʻdīl, ilal and maghāzī. The use of such works is an effort to reach all sources and right information as much as possible. Some of these sources are basic hadith books such as al-Bukhārī (d. 256/870) al-Sahīh, Muslim (d. 261/875) al- Sahīh, Abū Dāʾūd (d. 275/889) al-Sunan, al-Tirmidhī (d. 279/892) al-Sunan, al-Nasā’ī (d. 303/915) al-Sunan, Ibn Mādja (d. 273/887) al-Sunan, Mālik ibn Anas (d. 179/795) al-Muwatta, Ahmad ibn Hanbal (d. 241/855) al-Musnad, al-Dārimī (d. 255/869) al-Sunan, ʻAbd al-Razzāq al-Sanʻānī (d. 211/826-27) al-Musannaf, Ibn Abī Shayba (d. 235/849) al-Musannaf, Ibn Rāhwayh (d. 238/853) al-Musnad, al- Bazzār (d. 292/905) al-Musnad, Abu Yaʻlā el-Mawsilī (d. 307/919) al-Musnad, Ibn Hibbān (d. 354/965) al-Sahīh, al-Tabarānī (d. 360/971) al-Muʻjam al-Awsat and al-Muʻjam al-Kabīr, al-Hākim al-Naysābūrī (d. 405/1014) al-Mustadrak.al-Zarkashī divided the riwāyas he had studied into eight subjects. These are judgments, wisdom, zuhd, medicine, virtue, prayer, story, words and riwāyas circulating in language. He shares the information he obtains from sources about him after mentioning the riwāyas he will examine. For example, it is mentioned that there is not a hadith which is transmitted as a hadith, it is a word of a sahāba, tābiun or a person. He transferred on the riwāyas the sources mentioned in the sources, but also stated that he did not participate in some information as the place came.The author has evaluated the narrators of the riwāyas from the point of jarh and taʻdīl. He did not only evaluate riwāyas in terms of isnād, but also text criticism. This activity is a distinctive feature of his work.al-Zarkashī gave information about the misrepresentation of the name of the narrators. He also explained the strange words that are difficult to understand in the text. It is a manifestation of his knowledge in the fiqh area that some of the riwāyas that are considered weak are expressed in some sects. The author described some errors about the riwāyas. For example, he stated that a riwāya that is said to be marfūʻ is a mavkūf. al-Zarkashī also included verses, hadiths and poems about the riwāya that he had studied while writing his work or he defended it by saying that it is not the case of a riwāya that is said to be fictitious.Perhaps it is the weakest point of al-Zarkashī’s work not to give any information about some riwāya, only to mention their isnāds. He also found some riwāyas that did not have a reliable isnāds and stated that their meanings are correct. This knowledge has become an enlightening characteristic for later generations.This work has a great significance in showing that the majority of the riwāyas that spread among the people are not hadiths. As a matter of fact, 73% of the riwāyas examined in the work are weak or irrelevant riwāyas. This work of al-Zarkashī is unique. The existence of such a work has not been determined before him. This work constituted the basis of the works written by scholars such as al-Sakhāwī and al-Aclūnī in the same subject after him.

More...
Eş‘arîlik-Hanbelîlik Farklılaşmasının Toplumsal Yansımaları

Eş‘arîlik-Hanbelîlik Farklılaşmasının Toplumsal Yansımaları

Author(s): Ümüt Toru / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 1/2018

There is a close relationship between Ashʿarism and Ḥanbalism since the emergence of Ashʿarism. However, they often conflicted with each other as they approached to religious matters from different perspectives. These conflicts were not only limited to theological discussions but also turned into social conflicts, which occasionally resulted with deaths. First massive events occurred in 429/1038 in Baghdād between Ashʿarites and Ḥanbalities. When Niẓām al-Mulk was appointed as vizier, the conflicts reached a peak. The apparent reason of the conflicts was the theological controversy between these two sects. However, the rise of Ashʿarism, which was usually against Ḥanbalism, was the main reason of the social conflicts. Supports of the Ashʿarite thought by the leading statesmen of the era such as Niẓām al-Mulk and Ayyūbid sultans, and accusations of some Ashʿarite preachers about Ḥanbalities relying on this political support were also among the factors that led to these conflicts. Nevertheless, even if any accusation was not made, it occurred that the members of both sects resorted to violence in case of criticisms about their beliefs. This shows that the most important reason of the conflicts was sectarian fanaticism.Summary: Ashʿarism is the name of the sect that was formed around the ideas of Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī. It is a continuation of Kullābism in terms of general thought system. Ashʿarism replaced Kullābism by the end of the 5th century of the Hijrah, and started to be called as an independent sect. It spread mostly among the Shāfiʿites and Mālikites in Iraq, Khurāsān, Damascus, Maghreb, and Yemen. When it was arrived to the last quarter of the 5th century, it became the common theological sect of most of Shāfiʿites and Mālikites. Bāqillānī (d. 403/1013), Ibn Fūrāk (d. 406/1015), and Abū Isḥāq al-Isfarāyīnī’s (d. 418/1027) efforts played an important role in rising of Ashʿarism in this period. In the following periods, contribution of the Seljuk vizier Niẓām al-Mulk (d. 485/1092) to Ashʿarism was massive by establishing the Niẓāmiyah Colleges to strengthen the Ashʿarites against the Hanafites in Khurāsān and against the Ḥanbalites in Baghdād. The Niẓāmiyah Colleges were donated by Niẓām al-Mulk to Shāfiʿite scholars for the mission of primarily limiting the influence Shīʿī thought. The condition of belonging to Shāfiʿites in waqfiyyah (endowment certificate) of the colleges provided some important advantages for Shāfiʿites and Ashʿarites. On the other hand, the Ayyūbids provided important contributions to Ashʿarites in the regions of Egypt, Damascus and Yemen. They worked for strengthening Ashʿarism during their ruling for two centuries. It was a state policy for the Ayyūbids to support Ashʿarism starting from the founder of the state, Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn al-Ayyūbī (d. 589/1193).This rapid rise of Ashʿarism led to a tense relationship between the Ashʿarites and the Ḥanbalites who became the most important representative of Aṣḥāb al-ḥadīth (people of the traditions of the Prophet) after the period of Miḥnah (period of religious persecution). Undoubtedly, the first respondents of these tense relations were Kullābite scholars. At the beginning of the 4th century of the Hijrah, Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī became the natural inheritor of the Ḥanbalite reaction to the Kullābites. He conflicted with the Ḥanbalites because of his different approach on the debate regarding creation of the Qur’ān. Ḥanbalite reactions to Imam al-Ashʿarī continued after his death. When he died in Baghdād in 324/935, officials buried him secretly as they worried about Ḥanbalite attacks against his funeral. Hence, after his burial some Ḥanbalites tried to destroy his tomb several times. After Ashʿarī died, the first social events between the Ashʿarites and the Ḥanbalites took place in Iṣfahān, one of the most important cities of West Khurāsān, in the end of the 4th century of the Hijrah. The debate started around the question of whether the letters of the Qur’ān were created or uncreated between the Ḥanbalite scholar Ibn Mandah (d. 395/1005) and Ashʿarite scholar Abū Nuʿaym al-Iṣfahānī (d. 430/1038). This debate led to prolonged events between the supporters of these scholars. Abū Nuʿaym, saved his life from various attacks and finally he had to leave Iṣfahān.The tense relationships between the Ashʿarites and the Ḥanbalites reached the peak in the 5th century of the Hijrah. Many events occurred in Baghdād during this century. The discussion on interpretation of the revealed attributes of Allah turned into conflict between the two sides from time to time. The Ashʿarite scholars accused the Ḥanbalites with tashbih (affirming Allah’s similarity to humanity) and tajseem (anthropomorphism) by pointing at Abū Yaʿlā al-Farrā’s work titled Ibṭāl al-taʾwīl al-ṣifāt. The ʿAbbāsid caliphs generally supported the Ḥanbalites in this debate. For example, when al-Qāim bi-Amr Allāh re-published the famous declaration known as the Qādirī Creed in 433/1042, he proclaimed that rejection of the Ḥanbalite approach on the issue of the revealed attributes of Allah would be regarded as a cause of blasphemy. The paper was read in a meeting where several scholars from various sects were present. It was signed firstly by Ashʿarite scholar Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAli ibn ʿUmar al-Qazwīnī (d. 442/1051). However, he was one who had criticized Ibṭāl al-taʾwīl al-ṣifāt in 429/1038, which caused conflicts in society at that time. This shift in his position is remarkable as it shows that the declaration was primarily response to him.In the middle of the 5th century of the Hijrah, Ashʿarite scholar al-Khatīb al-Baghdādī (d. 463/1071) became a victim of the tension between the Ashʿarites and Ḥanbalites. Khatīb had protection of vizier Ibn al-Muslima and under his protection he lectured on Hadith in the Mansur Mosque. However, after the death of the vizier, he was subjected to harassment of the Ḥanbalites because of some expressions in his work titled Tarīkh Baghdād. So much so that he began to worry about his life, thus he had to leave Baghdād and went to Damascus in 451/1059.The tense relations between the Ashʿarites and the Ḥanbalites reached the summit in the period of Niẓām al-Mulk who was the vizier of Seljuk Empire. In fact, some events resulted with deaths. For example, in the events of 469/1076, which lasted years, the Ḥanbalites attacked Ashʿarite scholar Abū Naṣr ibn ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Qushayrī (d. 514/1120) who accused them with tashbeeh and tajseem. As a result, around twenty people died during these events. The gradual rise of the Ashʿarite thought with the support of Niẓām al-Mulk and abusive discourses of some Ashʿarite scholars who relied on this support can be mentioned among the basic reasons of the events at that time.After the death of Niẓām al-Mulk in 485/1092, for a long time there was no serious event between the Ashʿarites and the Ḥanbalites. In the middle of the 6th/12th century, the relations started to become tense again in the regions of Egypt, Damascus, and Yemen under the Ayyūbid dynasty. In addition to these places, various events occurred in Khurāsān region, in cities such as Marw. Nevertheless, unlike some previous events, the current tensions were not against a whole sect but only targeted some individual scholars. Moreover, unlike the previous periods, oppressed and victimized people were mostly Ḥanbalite scholars this time. No serious events took place between two sects after this period. Therefore, it can be said that their struggle to dominate society led to the above-mentioned events.

More...
İslam Bilim Tarihi’nde İlk Tercüme Faaliyetleri ve Bilgi Üretimine Katkısı

İslam Bilim Tarihi’nde İlk Tercüme Faaliyetleri ve Bilgi Üretimine Katkısı

Author(s): Mustafa Necati Barış / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 1/2018

With economic relations and conquests, Muslims have spread to a very wide geographical area. Consequently, they have encountered many different cultures. Muslims have had great interest and curiosity towards new cultures especially those of Byzantine (Helen / Greek), Iran and partly of the Indian cultures. Especially, the conquest of cities such as Alexandria, Harran and Jundīshāpūr and the scientific tradition in these cities had great influence on Muslims. After these conquests, Muslims not only studied Islamic sciences but also began the activities of translation into Arabic to get familiar with ancient tradition of thought and culture. These first translation activities, which are extremely important in terms of Islamic civilization and the history of science, have been studied extensively to date. However, it is observed that during the studies performed, the only information mentioned were usually the names of the translated works, the domains of study they were written for and the names of interpreters. This study aims to shed light on the first translation activities in the History of Islamic Science, as well as the fields in which these translations were done, the knowledge and the accumulation of Muslims in these fields before translation activities and the contribution of translation activities in development or change in these fields by providing examples from Muslim scientists in different centuries, whose works are also known in the West. The golden era of Muslims in science and technology between the 8th and 11th centuries and some important scientific activities carried out within this period are analyzed in three periods; “acquisition of the information”, “systematization of the information” and “production of original information”.Summary: Science is one of the most important mutual heritage of civilization and human history. Those who attach importance to science, scientific studies and scientists are mostly the ones who contributed to this heritage. Muslims, who are the members of a religion with the first holy command “Read,” have a respectful place among the societies that attached importance to science and therefore composed important works.Through economic relations and conquests, Muslims have spread to a very wide geographical area. Consequently, they encountered many different cultures. Muslims had great interest in and curiosity about new cultures especially those of Byzantine (Helen / Greek), Iran and partly of the Indian cultures. Especially, the conquest of cities such as Alexandria, Harrān and Jundīshāpūr and the scientific tradition in these cities had great influence on Muslims. After these conquests, Muslims not only studied Islamic sciences but also began the activities of translation into Arabic to get familiar with ancient tradition of thought and culture.Being extremely important in terms of Islamic civilization and the history of Islamic science, deals with the contribution of translation activities to information production. The golden era of Muslims in science and technology between the 8th and 11th centuries and the some important scientific activities carried out within this period are analyzed in three periods; “acquisition of the information,” “systematization of the information” and “production of original information”.The Holy Quran and the hadiths of the Prophet, which are regarded as two main sources of Islam, include many orders and recommendations praising and encouraging science. Moreover, according to Quranic verses and the hadiths, the role of science and scholarship has been a propelling power in religion, and consequently in whole human life. Therefore, the scientific activities that started in Mecca with Prophet Muhammad’s being prophet and continued in Medina, kept going intensively during the period of Rashidun Caliphate. Especially the first Islamic conquests helped Muslims encounter different civilizations specially Byzantine and Iran, make use of the works of these civilizations and begin translation activities intensively during the periods of Umayyads and ʿAbbāsids. As a result, Muslims have improved in social, applied and health sciences as well as religious sciences. What Muslims tried to do first is to understand the existing knowledge and then to improve and dedicate it to the use of world. In this study, the period commonly referred to as “acquisition of the information” encompasses the time when cities as Alexandria, Harran and Jundīshāpūr were conquered and the scientific tradition in these cities influenced Muslims and consequently the translation activities began. The purpose in that period was to get the knowledge regardless of its location and translate it into Arabic. “Systematization of the information” period addressed the process in which translation activities went on and the knowledge acquired via translation was systematized. The purpose of the period was to produce knowledge, make it utilizable and dedicate it to the society. In that period, also, science was praised and encouraged. Administrators and scholars of the period believed that all problems could be solved through science. Centers of translation (Bayt al-Ḥikmas) and observatories were established in this period. Appealing and influencing the Muslims, translations of the period enriched their culture but never led them lose their genuine identity. On the contrary, Muslim scholars, investigating the works of early scholars and criticizing them whenever necessary, never accepted them as absolute authority and produced their authentic works. In the period that is referred to as “production of original information,” the level of development reached in terms of science, is revealed presenting the notable scholars of these period and the ones recognized by European science community. Aforementioned period encompasses the era when scholars such as al-Fazārī (d. 190/806), Jabir b. Ḥayyān (d. 200/815), al-Khwārazmī (d. 232/847), al-Farghānī (d. 247/861), al-Ali b. Rabban al-Ṭabarī (ö. 247/861), Abū Bakr al-Rāzī (d. 313/925), Battani (d. 317/929), Abū l-Wafāʾ al-Būzjānī (d. 388/998), Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna) (d. 428/1037), ʿAlī b. ʿĪsā al-Kahhal (d. 430/1039), Ibn al-Haytham (d. 432/1040) and al-Bīrūnī (d. 453/1061) were at the top. In this period (between the 8th and 10th century), translations continued intensively. Moreover, research studies gained their own qualifications in terms of rules, methods and concepts. Islamic science experienced its golden age. The most inspiring works of the period were on mathematics, medicine, physics, Alchemy/chemistry and astronomy. Such scientific knowledge was recognized by the western world living in the darkness of scholastic idea between the 5th and 11th centuries, only after the 11th century via translations from Arabic.

More...
الإعداد التربوي للإنسان ضمن مفهوم التربية القرآنية البحتة الحقائق التربوي في قصة نبي الله يوسف عليه السلام أنموذج

الإعداد التربوي للإنسان ضمن مفهوم التربية القرآنية البحتة الحقائق التربوي في قصة نبي الله يوسف عليه السلام أنموذج

Author(s): Refik Kasım / Language(s): Arabic Issue: Special/2017

This article deals with the education model of the Qur'an in the life frame of the prophet Joseph. When the Prophet Joseph was a small child, his brothers threw it into the well, and the people in a caravan passing it took him to Egypt and sold them as slaves. The prophet Joseph was tested in the house where he was slave in Egypt. He wished to enter the prison to get rid of these troubles. After many years in prison, he was taken out of prison by pharaoh and made a finance minister. This article deals with the life education of Joseph the prophet.

More...

İlk Dönem İslam Tarihinde Yargının Kurumsallaşmasında Dört Halifenin Rolü

Author(s): Murat Akarsu / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 37/2018

In society, the realization of justice depends on the rules of law. In order for the rules of law to be implemented into practice, it must be made into a law by the person holding the legislative power. As a requirement of the orders of the Quran, the rules of law began to be established in Medina period and these rules were put into practice by the competent Companions. During the caliphate of Hz. Ebubekir, the arrangements put into practice by Rasulullah continued. Also, the caliphate of Hz. Ömer was the most important turning point in the development and institutionalization of the judiciary. As part of the value that Caliph Omar gave to justice, he made efforts to develop the judiciary, and began appointing special cadets to all provinces, in particular the cities established under the wider borders. Hz. Omer closely followed all administrative officials, especially the judiciary, and sent them continuous informative advices on the full realization of justice. His informational letters still hold an important position in judicial history. After Hz. Ömer, the period of the Hz. Osman period showed the institutional identity of the judiciary in spatial terms. In this sense, Hz. Ali also made important contributions towards the development of the judiciary. The period of four caliphs is a period in which judiciary independence is realized, where the judiciary is completely separated from judgement and legislation. In this period, even the caliphs stood trial by judges and there were decisions made against them. Despite this, theindepen dence of the judges did not suffer any harm but was rewarded.

More...
RECEPCIJA KUR'ANSKIH I HADISKIH POTICAJA ZA RAZVOJ ZNANOSTI U KLASIČNOM I
MODERNOM MUSLIMANSKOM SVIJETU

RECEPCIJA KUR'ANSKIH I HADISKIH POTICAJA ZA RAZVOJ ZNANOSTI U KLASIČNOM I MODERNOM MUSLIMANSKOM SVIJETU

Author(s): Muamer Neimarlija / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 16/2018

The aim of the current paper is to compare the reception of the Qur’an and Hadith texts related to science in the classical and modern world of Islamic culture. For this purpose, we have made the reinterpretation of certain texts related to science, within the constituent sources of Islam, the Qur’an and the Sunnah of Muhammad s.a.w.s., on the one hand, and the presentation of the attitude of Muslim people towards science in the medieval and modern times, on the other hand. Only certain texts from the Qur’an and Hadith, those, in the author’s opinion, the most relevant ones, were chosen for the further analysis. Moreover, the flash indicators in relation to the Muslim attitude towards science were presented through scientific innovations and current statistical data. For the purposes of this paper, a methodological approach based on the combination of traditional and rational tafsir (Halilović, 2015) and the application of a historical method (Granić & Karić, 2009) was used. The findings reveal the discontinuity of the initial scientific strenuousness within the Muslim circles, as well as the correlation between the multi-century scientific impotence and the long-lasting civilizational flounder of the Muslim community –ummah.

More...
NUŽNO ZNAČENJE ZAKONODAVNOG TEKSTA (IQTIḌĀUN-NAṢṢ) U ḤANEFIJSKOJ PRAVNOJ ŠKOLI

NUŽNO ZNAČENJE ZAKONODAVNOG TEKSTA (IQTIḌĀUN-NAṢṢ) U ḤANEFIJSKOJ PRAVNOJ ŠKOLI

Author(s): Šukrija Ramić / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 16/2018

The work on iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ explores the theoretical interpretations of Ḥanafi scholars in relation to the necessarily assumed meaning of the legislative text (iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ) and the consequences of such an interpretation on the regulations to which the Ḥanafis came in their legal reasoning (ijtihād). At the beginning of the paper, the linguistic and terminological definition of the concept of iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ in the Ḥanafi Law School is considered. Through the examples of iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ it is explained that the Ḥanafis used iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ in the argumentation of legal regulations. Furthermore, the status of iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ in the Ḥanafi Law School, and the way of giving preference in the case of contradiction between iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ and other indications are clarified. At the end of this paper, the basic results of this research are presented.

More...
TESAVVUF KAO METODIKA DUHOVNOG ODGOJA

TESAVVUF KAO METODIKA DUHOVNOG ODGOJA

Author(s): Mensur Valjevac,Mina Valjevac / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 16/2018

Tesawwuf is an authentic Islamic science like fiqh, tafsir, hadith, and similar. Tasawwuf is not mysticism, nor philosophy, but the essence of Islamic spirituality. Gnosis and education are its two main determinants, so it is embedded in the core of the Islamic concept of education. This was confirmed by Gazi-Husrev bey, a founder of high religious education in our region, who just next to his Madrasah built the Hanikah School for Spiritual Education, the attendance of which was an integral part of education in that time. The Islamic community and its educational institutions have an overwhelming need for the reintroduction and revitalization of the subject of tesawwuf in curricula, as a modern method of spiritual education.

More...
Çağdaş İslam Düşüncesi’nde Hilafet Anlayışları: Muhammed Hamîdullah ve Yüksek Hilafet Konseyi

Çağdaş İslam Düşüncesi’nde Hilafet Anlayışları: Muhammed Hamîdullah ve Yüksek Hilafet Konseyi

Author(s): Abdulkadir Macıt / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 2/2018

After the death of Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h), one of the most significant debated topics of Muslims was the institution of caliphate. This institution caused crucial argumentations through the ages from Abu Bakr to Abd-al-Majid who was the hundreth khalifa. Some prominent issues in that regard as follows: How khalifa comes to power, who becomes khalifa, whether he is descended from Quraysh or not, which kind of traits khalifa should have, and how khalifa should behave in certain circumstances. While these arguments were going on, caliphate was maintained based on the reign under some certain dynasties’ responsibilities after the Rashidun (rightly guided) Caliphs. Umayyads, Abbasids and Ottoman Dynasties were the most well-known ones of these dynasties. Throughout history, even though caliphate passed in one another’s hands among aforementioned dynasties, none of them did attempt to abolish this position. However, Turkish Muslims who became defeated with European occupation of non-western territories decided to abolish caliphate for the sake of modernization activities within the period of transition from imperialism to nation state. This decision brought about a trauma, which was much more critical than former argumentation around the position in Muslim world. Many congresses were organized in Islamic world in order to recover from this trauma. While this kind of quests were continuing, Muhammad Hamīdullah proposed “High Caliphate Council” in relation to rearrangement of caliphate in accordance with the conditions of Islamic countries. This proposal offers an applicable model to today’s modern nation states by establishing unity among them and leaving aside their conflicts and differences. This proposal offers a resolution of much-discussed matters of the position within the limits of principals. It also draws attention by showing a possibility of Islamic union in contemporary Islamic thought. Summary: The matters of who undertakes the management of societies, how rulers come to power and in what manners the rulers maintain the management have been discussed throughout history. It is seen that rulers adopted kingdom as regime before the period of the Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h). There was also two-person management. The discussions about this matter were also seen around khalifas who were the rulers of Muslims after the death of Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h). Some debated issues in that regards as follows: Who becomes khalifa, how he is elected, which traits he should possess, and so on. Caliphate continued its existence despite the discussions until the first quarter of the 14th Hijra era. Abolition of caliphate was a trauma for Muslims undoubtedly. From Anatolia to Egypt and from India to the Balkans, many attempts were carried out to recover from this trauma. However, this matter was oversimplified in the conditions of that period since it became a topic which was hushed over in just congresses and conventions. One of the people who wrote on this topic, which maintains its vitality even today was Muhammad Hamīdullah. He was an important Islamic scholar, a lawyer and a historian in Indian geography. Hamīdullah did deal caliphate by indicating its history broadly. The distinctive feature of Hamīdullah from others who wrote on this topic is that he also presented a considerable offer to solve the matter. In this sense, Hamīdullah experienced the trauma in his own life as all muslims did it with the abolition of caliphate. Hence he mentioned this matter in his writings in the mood of care and dignity of a scientist and also in feeling of a heartbroken muslim. Hamīdullah made clear that the method of election of the ruler differed throughout history. Indeed, the verses of Holy Qur’ān, the applications of the Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) and the differences of Four Great Chaliphs on coming to power testified this claim. According to Hamīdullah, it is quite normal that the method of regime can vary according to the conditions of societies. He recommended acting based on timeless rules rather than the changes that vary according to conditions and places. He also stated that the regime which Islam approves is a combination of kingdom and democracy in his lines dealing with methods of regime. To him, kingdom is the method of regime of empire. Empire is the regime in which various nationalities live together with all their differences and interact with one another intensely and in which the rulers rule over wide borders. On the other hand, Islamic world lost its edges of empire, changed its regime and divided to nation states after the decline of the Ottoman Empire and Mughal Empire which were established by Muslims. On the contrary, westerners attempted to establish a head empire several times after building nation states in Europe. Some of them are UN, NATO, EU, to name but a few. In our opinion, in the transition process of Muslim rulers from empire to nation state, Hamīdullah made an offer to accomodate Islamic law in state law, Islamic politic and administrative principles in politics and administration practices, Islamic education system in education system, and principles of Islamic economics in economic decisions of government using the Prophet Muhammed’s life as a base. He also explained to Muslims that the method of regime can be changed and the essential matter is to apply Islamic management principles in such a new situation. He played a role in clearing the way for Muslims by indicating that the method of Islamic regime can be changed according to conditions but the principles of Islam are unalterable. To the writer of these lines, Hamīdullah intimates that it is not so true to stick to the form of the process in Muslim territories in which a compulsory transition from the empires or multinational social structures to the nation state structures have been experienced for the last two ages. However, the first matter to dwell on should be whether the ruler of the government behaves in accoradance with the principles of Islam or not. To Hamīdullah, the second matter is that even though Muslim countries had to enter in the process of becoming nation states, Muslims should make an effort to establish supra-state associations as required by Islam. In this respect, Hamīdullah’s proposal is “High Caliphate Council”. This council is a considerable offer presented to Muslim countries in the age when a universal caliphate is not possible and Muslims head towards a unified state form all over the world. Today, this offer recommends countries of which great majority is Muslims and in which Muslims are minority to meet on a common ground rather than conflict because of differences among them. The High Caliphate Council is an institute consists of presidents or hereditary administrators as leading and regular members and so it avoids regional competition. It is established by Muslim presidents who shares the chair alternately. Based on this, all Muslim presidents play a role altogether in this council without need to be Sunni, Shia, or from Quraysh. The High Caliphate Council is a reflection of a dream, which started a century and half a century ago but is required more today. It is also a reflection of the discourse of “Islamic Union” in Contemporary Islamic Thought. The Caliphate Council and International Islamic Legists’ Association, which is the first practical step of the council can be seen as the theory of a new world order based on the unity principle of Islam. Hamīdullah does not consider this order not only in the range of belief but also with the aim of institutionalizing ‘ijmā (consensus of Islamic legists) and qiyās(legal analogy). He stated that International Islamic Legists’ Association, which is a scientific institution could not be established beforetime by Muslims spread on three continents due to lacking of communication among them. However, thanks to today’s possibilities, the establishment of such association is easier today. Hamīdullah found dynamic solutions such these two institutions for the realization of caliphate, which is a religious necessity . He marked an era for Muslims in the period of time when they are on a quest.

More...
Halîfe b. Hayyât’ın Tarih Yazıcılığı Metodu

Halîfe b. Hayyât’ın Tarih Yazıcılığı Metodu

Author(s): Ömer SABUNCU,Mahmut SABUNCU / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 2/2018

Khalīfa b. Khayyāt(d. 240/854-855) was an historian- muḥaddith in the ʿAbbāsid’s period. There are references in sources to his competence in history and lineage rather than Ḥadīth. Two works of him have survived. The first one is al-Ṭabaḳāt which is about study of men and the second one is al-Taʾrīkhwhich chronologically narrates the events in the history of Islam until 232 AH. The latter is the most significant work to be applied for the historiography of ibnKhayyāt. In this article, Khalīfa b. Khayyāt’s methodology in historiography is examined. In this study, the early period of Islamic histography is handled and the subject is discussed comparatively. The main characteristics of his historiography are his adoption of a chronological style that facilitates the follow-up of the book, his knowledge for the lineage of those who died in wars and the details about the wars. Also, among the charactersitics are his application of isnād to his history book as a muḥaddith, his knowledge for the previous resources via his teachers who belong to the schools of al-Madīna and ʿIrāḳ and when required, his usage of ayah, ḥadīth and poems. These issues are dealed in the artcile with examples. Besides, a study in the West about Khalīfa b. Khayyātasserts that he was a follower of Umayyad dynasty and so this affected his historiography. In this article, this assertion is tackled by analyzing the whole book and it concludes that it is not valid because of some narrations against this assertion.SummaryKhalīfa b. Khayyāt (d. 240 / 854-55), who grew up in Basra, one of the most important centers of scholarship of the time and the meeting point of scholars, and he continued his scholarly works in this city. Since his grandfather and father are engaged in the field of Ḥadīth, Khalīfa b. Khayyāt started his scholarly adventure at an early age and he took his first education in the field of Ḥadīth.Scholars, in the early periods, continued their studies in the fields of sciences related to each other. Khalīfa b. Khayyāt’s studies are also in this kind. Although there are references in sources to his accumulation of Ḥadīth, Khalīfa b. Khayyāt ’s main area of ​​expertise is history and nasab/genealogy. The fact that his works and references to him in later sources are largely related to historical events, knowledge of the nasab/genealogy, and wafayāt (death dates of Ḥadīth scholars and narrators) reveals his considerable knowledge on these issues. Khalīfa b. Khayyāt lived in the period of ʿAbbāsid caliphs al-Maʾmūn (813-833) and al-Muʿtaṣim (833-842). This period is important because of the fact that the al-Mihna incident took place and the pressure on the Ḥadīth scholars increased. Although Khalīfa b. Khayyāt is not one of the direct opponents of Muʿtazila, his participation in a debate against them provides clues about the place where he stands. The scholarly atmosphere of Basra, enabled Khalīfa b. Khayyāt to benefit from a wide range of teacher-student network. In addition to his professors from whom he benefitted in the field of Ḥadīth, he had the opportunity to obtain the knowledge and understanding of the history of that time through his teachers who are important historians of the period in his field. Two works related to Khalīfa b. Khayyāt whose reliability is confirmed by djarh wa l tadil scholars reached to our time. One of the oldest Ṭabaḳāt works in the history of Islam is al-Ṭabaḳāt; the other one is the book, al-Taʾrīkh, which provides a new method for Islamic historiography.This study deals with the principles of the method of historiography, which can be put forward through Khalīfa b. Khayyāt 's al-Taʾrīkh. al-Taʾrīkhis important in terms of being the first example of chronological writing type in Islamic historiography and has not been subject to any independent study to date. There are two ongoing M.A. thesis about Khalīfa b. Khayyāt, however, no study has been identified that directly deals with its methodology of history. On the other hand, based on some riwāyats/narrations in al-Taʾrīkh, there is a work that claims that Khalīfa b. Khayyāt had sympathy towards Umayyads. The study named “Khalīfa b. Khayyāt’s History on the Umayyad Dynasty (660-750), prepared by Carl Wurtzel as his PhD. Dissertation, examined the life of Khalīfa, partly the historiography and the religious-political narrations in the work. On the case of Muʿāwiya’s (d. 60/680) request of the allegiance to Yazīd (d. 64/683), Wurtzel compared an event that took place between the envoy of Ibn al-Zubayr (d. 73/692) and Muʿāwiya with al-Balādhurī’s (d. 279/892-93) narrative and concluded that Khalīfa was an Umayyad sympathizer. However, Khalīfa b. Khayyāt’s exclusion of an event such as al-Mihna which was against the ʿAbbāsid and changed the course of history in his book, shouldn’t be considered as a symptom of sympathy; It would be more appropriate to accept it as a feature of history writing.At the top of Khalīfa b. Khayyāt's principles of historiography, adopting chronological method comes first. Accordingly, Khalīfa b. Khayyāt, gives a brief history about the siyar of the Prophet Muhammad at the introduction of the book. Then, by beginning from the first hijri year, he gives the important events, wars and deaths by the years. Sometimes, he refers to the people assigned by the caliphs of the period by referring to the Amîrs (Administrators) of the Hajj. He gives lists of those who died on both sides of the wars. The importance of mentioning the tribes of the deceased shows his competence in the knowledge of nasab. One of the highlights of his historiography is that he sometimes does not touch upon some of the events and situations that are considered to be turning points in Islamic history; and sometimes he does not go down into detail but just gives relevant narratives. For example, he doesn’t mention any narrations about the selection of the Caliph which perhaps the most fundamental point of separation between Ahl al-Sunnah and Shīʿa in the history of Islam.Although he gave detailed information about The Battle of The Camel (36/656) and Ṣiffīn cases (37/657), it is not possible to determine his views on this subject. In addition, he never mentioned the al-Mihna incident, which deeply influenced society and the scholarly environment during the ʿAbbāsid period. Isnād is also holds an important place in the methodology of history of Khalīfa who was a muḥaddith at the same time. In many of the narrations he used the words haddathanā and ahbaranā.In our study, the siyar section of al-Taʾrīkhwas examined in order to determine the sources of the Khalīfa’s historiography and has been seen that the works of Ibn Isḥāḳ (d. 151/768) and Ibn Hishām (d. 218/833) were the main sources of this chapter. Considering Khalīfa b. Khayyāt’s emphasize to isnād and his reach to Ibn Isḥāḳ 's work through the mediation of Bekr b. Suleiman, it can be said that he was dominant in historiography on the sources before him. Khalīfa b. Khayyāt rarely refers to Qur’anic verses and hadiths when describing events. He referred to the verses in only two places and hadiths in only five places. One of them, and perhaps the most remarkable one in the book is the Ḥadīth of the Prophet Muḥammad: “I am the guardian of whom; ‘Alī is his guardian” This narration is used in the letter of Caliph Mahdī (d. 169/785) of the ʿAbbāsid to khārijī (outer) Abd al-Salām b. Hishām who rebelled. The study is based on the principles outlined above. At the end of the study it is also considered that Khalīfa b. Khayyāt ’s works should be the subject of graduate studies which should be prepared with deep readings.

More...
Filozofizacija Eš'arijevog učenja

Filozofizacija Eš'arijevog učenja

Author(s): Hasan Džilo,Šinazi Mehmedi / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 1/2018

The purpose of this paper is to show that the theological thought in Islam also contains philosophical findings of crucial importance in the history of ideas. Striking examples of such a philosophical discourse are al-Baqillani, al-Ghazali and Fakhruddin Razi. Taking Ash‘ari’s teachings as a starting point, they significantly deepened some of the philosophical views that were also discussed in European philosophy after the Renaissance. Al-Baqillani contended that dealing with metaphysics was necessary for the crystallization of religious teachings. He opted to reflect upon substance, accidents, existents, the rift among the existents, as well as on the multitude and other questions. Al-Ghazali broke the metaphysical monotony of the time by revealing not only truths but also misconceptions in metaphysical discussions, while providing supporting evidence and showing a strong dialectical and logical ability. Fakhruddin Razi went so far as to compare wisdom with Kalām, believing that Kalām is, in fact, the one true wisdom. His works show that he tackled every significant philosophical debate to date. The arguments of these religious philosophers are clear evidence of the theologization of philosophy or the philosophization of theology.

More...

Irak Selçukluları’nda Sosyal, Ekonomik, Kültürel ve Dini Yapı Hakkında

Author(s): Hüseyin Kayhan / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 2/2018

Despite the economic-political setbacks, Iraqi Seljukids contributed to the development of the Western Iran and Azerbaijan in all aspects in the 12th century. It thus left behind not only rich cities such as Hamadan, Isfahan, and Tabriz, a country like Azerbaijan, which, together with Anatolia, turned into a Turkish motherland, but also principalities and atabeg states. They gave importance to the development, prosperity, and enhancement of social, economic, religious, and cultural structure, happiness of the people, peace and security. With such characteristics, it became a model state entity in the following centuries. Modern Iranian historians such as Rāvendī commended about this phenomenon, eulogizing the beauty of the Seljukids era. The sultans of Iraqi Seljuks abolished forced labour (corve'e) and boosted trade in cities. With aim to improve agriculture they built irrigation canals in villages and mezra'as while the manufacturing process for consumer goods, commerce and price movements were subject to a strict supervision. In the cultural domain, they supported scholars as well as poets and built madrasahs and educational institutions. They provided equal and fair treatment to their subjects of various religious and ethnic backgrounds. They not only supported Muslim clergy by offering financial aid to their zawiyahs aid, but also hesitated to interfere in the religious, social, commercial and cultural activities of Christians and Jews.

More...
İbn Teymiyye’de Selef ve Selefiyye Kavramları

İbn Teymiyye’de Selef ve Selefiyye Kavramları

Author(s): İsmail Akkoyunlu / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 1/2019

Salafism is one of the most important issues of the last few centuries. There are intense discussions on the issues related to Salafism, its emergence, how it was first used by whom and in what sense. Discussions about Salafism are sometimes experienced in relation to whether this concept corresponds to a mentality or to a sect, and sometimes this phenomenon is brought up in relation to a number of important names that have taken place in the history of Islamic thought. Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728/1328) emerges as the most frequently mentioned name in this context. Therefore, in this article, we have examined how Salafism/Salafiyya concept is used in the works of Ibn Taymiyya who is accepted as the theorist and the most powerful representative of Salafism. We have discussed the issue in a comprehensive manner by including the concept of Salaf, which is one of the most used concepts of Ibn Taymiyya. When we consider Ibn Taymiyya's use of the concepts of Salaf and Salafiyya, the concept of Salaf is seen to be used much more than the concept of Salafiyya. Thus, the concept of Salaf in the thought of Ibn Taymiyya refers to the Islamic society that lived in the early centuries and the conception of religion revealed by this society. The concept of Salafiyya, however, appears to have been used in a way that reflects a mentality and a way of thinking rather than a particular school or sect.

More...
OSMANLI GELENEĞİNDE SAKAL-I ŞERİFİN YERİ VE BULGARİSTAN’DA SAKAL-I ŞERİF MUHAFAZALI CAMİLER

OSMANLI GELENEĞİNDE SAKAL-I ŞERİFİN YERİ VE BULGARİSTAN’DA SAKAL-I ŞERİF MUHAFAZALI CAMİLER

Author(s): Bahriye Gülay Gülyüz / Language(s): Turkish Issue: 1/2019

The love for Muhammad has been a unifying element for Muslim Turks in every geography. This love, which is not confined to the person of the Prophet, has been extended to include the people and things that he is in contact with. Particularly, the parts of the body of the Prophet have a special importance for Muslims. Among these elements, which are protected as sacred entrances, the sakal-ısherifs(hair from Prophet’s beard) dominate in number.In the Ottoman tradition, the sakal-ı sherifs were kept in the appropriate places of clothing and were generally preserved in their private enclosures in mosques and households, and were visited on blessed days and nights. This tradition was carried to different geographies with the Ottomans.It is known that some of the mosques in Bulgaria, which is one of the first places to be conquered by the Ottomans in the Balkans, kept the sakal-ı sherifs. However, depending on the region's emergence of Ottoman rule, it became difficult to determine the number of these structures. Some of the sakal-ı sherifs in the mosques in Bulgaria have survivedand some have been forgotten. In this study, it will be tried to determine the mosques that maintain the holy beard in Bulgaria based on the existing examples and architectural tradition.

More...
Result 101-120 of 740
  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • ...
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • Next

About

CEEOL is a leading provider of academic eJournals, eBooks and Grey Literature documents in Humanities and Social Sciences from and about Central, East and Southeast Europe. In the rapidly changing digital sphere CEEOL is a reliable source of adjusting expertise trusted by scholars, researchers, publishers, and librarians. CEEOL offers various services to subscribing institutions and their patrons to make access to its content as easy as possible. CEEOL supports publishers to reach new audiences and disseminate the scientific achievements to a broad readership worldwide. Un-affiliated scholars have the possibility to access the repository by creating their personal user account.

Contact Us

Central and Eastern European Online Library GmbH
Basaltstrasse 9
60487 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main HRB 102056
VAT number: DE300273105
Phone: +49 (0)69-20026820
Email: info@ceeol.com

Connect with CEEOL

  • Join our Facebook page
  • Follow us on Twitter
CEEOL Logo Footer
2025 © CEEOL. ALL Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of use | Accessibility
ver2.0.428
Toggle Accessibility Mode

Login CEEOL

{{forgottenPasswordMessage.Message}}

Enter your Username (Email) below.

Institutional Login