Religion in Family Relations – Right of the Child to Choose Religion and/or Right of Parents to Raise the Child According to their own Religious Beliefs Cover Image

Religion in Family Relations – Right of the Child to Choose Religion and/or Right of Parents to Raise the Child According to their own Religious Beliefs
Religion in Family Relations – Right of the Child to Choose Religion and/or Right of Parents to Raise the Child According to their own Religious Beliefs

Author(s): Uroš Novaković
Subject(s): Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Politics and religion
Published by: Центар за проучавање религије и верску толеранцију
Keywords: Religious freedom; religion; political science of religion; child’s religion; parental responsibility; right of the child; child well-being

Summary/Abstract: The state has an obligation to respect the principle of religious freedom. According to that principle, religious orientation of the parents should not be questioned, but on the other side child should be protected by the state in the sense that religious practice of the parents is not harmful for development and well-being of the child. State policy can take a stand that it is exclusive right of par ents to determine the religion of the child and to raise the child in a religious way, or instead of that, child of a certain age can have the right to choose own religion. Religious norms are connected to the law through the guarantying of religious rights and freedoms. Although the parent which exercises parental rights primar ily raise the child, since the determination of religion is a matter that significantly affects the life of a child, the author’s view is that a parent who does not exercise parental rights has the right to give consent to the choice or the change of child’s religion, and without his consent, another parent cannot determine child’s reli gion. Courts should avoid decisions that are based strictly on parents’ religious be liefs. However, due to the parents’ religious beliefs, the well-being of the child can be endangered (prohibition of undertaking medical interventions, blood transfu sion). The author considers that existence of potential concrete risk is enough (a statement that medical intervention would not be allowed) so the parental re sponsibility, due to parent’s religion, would be assigned to another parent.

  • Issue Year: XII/2018
  • Issue No: 1
  • Page Range: 151-184
  • Page Count: 34
  • Language: English