Identificarea „parchetului de pe lângă instanţa care a judecat cauza în primă instanţă” căreia i se adresează cererea de revizuire, conform art. 397 alin. 1 C.p.p.
Identification of the prosecution office of the court that judged the case in the first instance to which the request of revision is to be sent in accordance with provisions of art. 397, paragraph 1 of Criminal Procedure Code
Author(s): Butucianu EmilSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Universul Juridic
Summary/Abstract: The institution of revision has the role of procedural remedy, being connected with the possibility of the interference of some legal errors. By its procedural function it enables the discovery, collection and presentation in front of the courts of the new probative material, unknown to them in judging and initial solving of the criminal law conflict deducted from trial. The revision is being allowed, by the actual regulation, in the system of unitary competence, meaning that the trial in principle of the revision request as well as the actual trial shall develop in front of the same court who has judged the cause in the first instance (art. 401 Criminal Procedure Code).
Journal: Revista Pro Lege
- Issue Year: 2008
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 107-115
- Page Count: 9
- Language: Romanian
