17. High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 1 of 17 February 2014, file no. 20/2013, published in Official Journal no. 283 of 17 April 2014 Cover Image
  • Price 5.40 €

17. Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie. Completul competent să judece recursul în interesul legii, decizia nr. 1 din 17 februarie 2014, în dosarul nr. 20/2013, publicată în M. Of. nr. 283 din 17 aprilie 2014
17. High Court of Cassation and Justice, decision no. 1 of 17 February 2014, file no. 20/2013, published in Official Journal no. 283 of 17 April 2014

Author(s): Aneta Ionescu
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: interpretation of transitional civil law; extinctive prescription regime; Decree 167/1958 vs. Civil Code 2009;

Summary/Abstract: I. The Legal Issue That Generated Divergent Case Law The interpretation and application of Articles 5, 201, and 223 of Law no. 71/2011 for the implementation of Law no. 287/2009 on the Civil Code, and of Articles 6 paragraph (4), 2,512, and 2,513 of the Civil Code, in relation to Article 18 of Decree no. 167/1958 on extinctive prescription, republished, concerning the possibility for courts or parties to invoke, after the procedural moment provided in Article 2,513 of the Civil Code, the exception of extinctive prescription in cases where the prescriptive periods began under the regime of Decree no. 167/1958 and were either completed or not completed by the date of entry into force of the Civil Code—1 October 2011.

  • Issue Year: 2014
  • Issue No: 04
  • Page Range: 116-121
  • Page Count: 6
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode