27. Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, Secţiile Unite, decizia nr. 19 din 18 noiembrie 2013, în dosarul nr. 13/2013, publicată în M. Of. nr. 45 din 20 ianuarie 2014
27. High Court of Cassation and Justice, United Sections, decision no. 19 of 18 November 2013, file no. 13/2013, published in Official Journal no. 45 of 20 January 2014
Author(s): Aneta IonescuSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: High Court; non‑unitary judicial practice; legal interpretation;
Summary/Abstract: The High Court, deliberating on the appeal in the interest of the law, notes the following: The legal issue that generated non‑unitary case law From the content of the appeal in the interest of the law, filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 514 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the Prosecutor General of the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice, it appears that there is no unified judicial practice regarding the interpretation and application of the provisions of Articles 1, 2(1), and 15(p) of Law No. 146/1997, as subsequently amended and supplemented, in relation to the stamping (court fees) of claims through which litigation costs are requested separately.
Journal: Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă
- Issue Year: 2014
- Issue No: 01
- Page Range: 142-146
- Page Count: 5
- Language: Romanian
- Content File-PDF
