30. Inadmisibilitatea sesizării Înaltei Curți de Casație și Justiție în scopul dezlegării unei chestiuni de drept, atâta timp cât nu este îndeplinită condiția ca de această lămurire să depindă soluționarea în fond a cauzei
30. Inadmissibility of High Court of Cassation and Justice referral in order to loose a law matter, as long as the condition that on this explanation depends the resolving of the case is not fulfilled
Author(s): Aneta Ionescu, Ioana Veronica VargaSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: jurisprudence unification; civil procedure; questions of law; procedural competence; jurisdiction determination;
Summary/Abstract: The use of the unification of jurisprudence governed by the provisions of art. 519 and following of the new Code of civil procedure, adopted by Law no. 134/2010, has a limited application, through the legal text mentioned, only to the questions of law which lead to solving the case merits under statuary on the legal relationship before the Court. A procedural issue identified in the settlement procedure regulator of competence does not affect the substance of the dispute, representing a simple procedural incident in judgment regarding the determination of jurisdiction to hear the case.
Journal: Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă
- Issue Year: 2014
- Issue No: 01
- Page Range: 154-162
- Page Count: 9
- Language: Romanian
- Content File-PDF
