Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.
  • Log In
  • Register
CEEOL Logo
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • SUBJECT AREAS
  • PUBLISHERS
  • JOURNALS
  • eBooks
  • GREY LITERATURE
  • CEEOL-DIGITS
  • INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT
  • Help
  • Contact
  • for LIBRARIANS
  • for PUBLISHERS

Filters

Content Type

Keywords (660)

  • Montenegro (136)
  • corruption (31)
  • human rights (31)
  • media (30)
  • governance (28)
  • politics (25)
  • transparency (24)
  • Montenegro (21)
  • municipalities (17)
  • EU (16)
  • education (13)
  • policy (13)
  • EU accession (12)
  • report (12)
  • judiciary (11)
  • public service broadcasting (11)
  • RTCG (10)
  • NGO (9)
  • discrimination (9)
  • legislation (9)
  • political parties (9)
  • elections (8)
  • integration (8)
  • public finances (8)
  • 90s (7)
  • law (7)
  • local self-government (7)
  • civil society (6)
  • public procurement (6)
  • education (6)
  • 2016 (5)
  • ECHR (5)
  • Kotor (5)
  • local level (5)
  • manual (5)
  • methodology (5)
  • penal policy (5)
  • prevention (5)
  • war (5)
  • Constitution (4)
  • criminal law (4)
  • finances (4)
  • marketing (4)
  • online teaching (4)
  • parliamentary elections (4)
  • regulation (4)
  • school education (4)
  • war crimes (4)
  • 2012 (3)
  • 2020 (3)
  • Accountability (3)
  • Budva (3)
  • Corruption (3)
  • EU integrations (3)
  • European integration (3)
  • Human rights (3)
  • Pljevlja (3)
  • Podgorica (3)
  • University of Montenegro (3)
  • Yugoslavia (3)
  • budget (3)
  • censorship (3)
  • citizens (3)
  • crime (3)
  • dealing with the past (3)
  • democratization (3)
  • detention (3)
  • employment (3)
  • ethics (3)
  • extremism (3)
  • financing (3)
  • gender (3)
  • government (3)
  • guide for professionals (3)
  • handbook (3)
  • history (3)
  • information access (3)
  • measures (3)
  • minorities (3)
  • monitoring (3)
  • More...

Subjects (126)

  • Politics (118)
  • Governance (82)
  • Government/Political systems (76)
  • Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption (58)
  • Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (51)
  • Media studies (46)
  • Civil Society (37)
  • EU-Approach / EU-Accession / EU-Development (30)
  • Criminal Law (29)
  • State/Government and Education (29)
  • Public Finances (26)
  • Court case (24)
  • School education (22)
  • Education (21)
  • Studies in violence and power (21)
  • Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) (20)
  • Policy, planning, forecast and speculation (19)
  • Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence (17)
  • Electoral systems (17)
  • Pedagogy (17)
  • Gender Studies (16)
  • Social differentiation (16)
  • Higher Education (15)
  • Military history (14)
  • Present Times (2010 - today) (14)
  • Fiscal Politics / Budgeting (14)
  • EU-Legislation (14)
  • Economic policy (13)
  • Politics and society (13)
  • Sociology of Education (13)
  • Communication studies (12)
  • Penal Policy (12)
  • Public Administration (11)
  • Political history (11)
  • ICT Information and Communications Technologies (10)
  • Politics and law (9)
  • Health and medicine and law (9)
  • Marketing / Advertising (9)
  • Constitutional Law (8)
  • Socio-Economic Research (8)
  • Wars in Jugoslavia (8)
  • International Law (7)
  • International relations/trade (7)
  • Security and defense (7)
  • Welfare systems (7)
  • Peace and Conflict Studies (7)
  • History (6)
  • Labor relations (6)
  • Comparative politics (6)
  • Politics of History/Memory (6)
  • Political Philosophy (5)
  • Public Law (5)
  • Politics / Political Sciences (4)
  • Ethics / Practical Philosophy (4)
  • Recent History (1900 till today) (4)
  • Contemporary Philosophy (4)
  • Political behavior (4)
  • Methodology and research technology (4)
  • Social Norms / Social Control (4)
  • Labour and Social Security Law (4)
  • Cultural history (3)
  • Energy and Environmental Studies (3)
  • Politics and communication (3)
  • Criminology (3)
  • Demography and human biology (3)
  • Nationalism Studies (3)
  • Inter-Ethnic Relations (3)
  • Sociology of Politics (3)
  • Architecture (2)
  • Social history (2)
  • Environmental and Energy policy (2)
  • Behaviorism (2)
  • Psychoanalysis (2)
  • Family and social welfare (2)
  • Rural and urban sociology (2)
  • Social Informatics (2)
  • Fascism, Nazism and WW II (2)
  • Ethnic Minorities Studies (2)
  • Accounting - Business Administration (2)
  • Human Resources in Economy (2)
  • More...

Authors (169)

  • Daliborka Uljarević (95)
  • Mira Popović (25)
  • Miloš Vukanović (20)
  • Damir Nikočević (19)
  • Petar Đukanović (17)
  • Tamara Milaš (16)
  • Boris Marić (14)
  • Vladimir Vučković (14)
  • Ana Nenezić (13)
  • Jovana Marović (12)
  • Not Specified Author (12)
  • Nikola Djonović (10)
  • Snežana Kaluđerović (10)
  • Stevo Muk (9)
  • Dina Bajramspahić (8)
  • Ana Vujošević (8)
  • Igor Radulović (8)
  • Wanda Tiefenbacher (7)
  • Željka Ćetković (7)
  • Marko Šošić (6)
  • Aleksandar Saša Zeković (5)
  • Filip Kovačević (5)
  • Maja Marinović (5)
  • Duško Vuković (4)
  • Radoš Mušović (4)
  • Tea Gorjanc-Prelević (4)
  • Mira Popović Trstenjak (4)
  • Miloš Knežević (3)
  • Bojan Božović (3)
  • Zlatko Vujović (3)
  • Jelena Mijanović (3)
  • Danijel Radević (3)
  • Jelena Jovanović Marović (3)
  • Dejana Ponoš (3)
  • Vasilije Radulović (3)
  • Damir Suljević (3)
  • Monika Mrnjačević (3)
  • Zoran Stoiljković (3)
  • Miloš Vuković (3)
  • Danilo Ajković (3)
  • Jovana Hajduković (3)
  • Milorad Marković (2)
  • Nikola Mirković (2)
  • Matej Babič (2)
  • Jarmila Bujak Stanko (2)
  • Vasko Raičević (2)
  • Vesna Rajković Nenadić (2)
  • Milena Milošević (2)
  • Mirko Bošković (2)
  • Borislav Vukičević (2)
  • Milica Milonjić (2)
  • Thomas R. Lansner (2)
  • Dragoljub Duško Vuković (2)
  • Slavoljub Šćekić (2)
  • Goran Đurović (2)
  • Siniša Gazivoda (2)
  • Admir Gjoni (2)
  • Nikola Gjonović (2)
  • Maja Mugoša (2)
  • Milena Brajović (2)
  • Rade Vujović (2)
  • Marijana Laković Drašković (2)
  • Maja Stojanović (2)
  • Isidora Radonjić (2)
  • Maja Raičević (2)
  • Luka Stijepović (2)
  • Daliborka Knežević (2)
  • Olivera Vulić (2)
  • Andrea Lekić (2)
  • Andrijana Radević (2)
  • Anđela Nenadić (2)
  • Bojan Vukojičić (2)
  • Dušan Pejaković (2)
  • Jelena Kontić (2)
  • Nina Đuranović (2)
  • Rajko Vučetić (2)
  • Vanja Đikanović (2)
  • Ivana Matanovič (2)
  • More...

Languages

Legend

  • Journal
  • Article
  • Book
  • Chapter
  • Open Access

Publisher: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO)

Result 221-231 of 231
  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ...
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
STUDENT PRACTICE IN MONTENEGRO - BETWEEN ASPIRATIONS AND REALITY - LESSONS LEARNED FROM PROJECT «ACTIVE STUDENTS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT»
0.00 €

STUDENT PRACTICE IN MONTENEGRO - BETWEEN ASPIRATIONS AND REALITY - LESSONS LEARNED FROM PROJECT «ACTIVE STUDENTS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT»

STUDENT PRACTICE IN MONTENEGRO - BETWEEN ASPIRATIONS AND REALITY - LESSONS LEARNED FROM PROJECT «ACTIVE STUDENTS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT»

Author(s): Damir Nikočević,Andrea Lekić,Andrijana Radević,Anđela Nenadić,Bojan Vukojičić,Dušan Pejaković,Jelena Kontić,Marija Bulatović,Nina Đuranović,Rajko Vučetić,Vanja Đikanović / Language(s): English

Keywords: Higher education; students for sustainable development; Faculty of political sciences in Montenegro; finding a job;

Youth unemployment is one of the greatest problems which countries of region and Europe are facing. There are numerous reasons for such state. Incompatibility of educational system with needs of labour market results in saturation of certain professions, while highly specialised areas remain in deficit, are only some of those reasons. Global economic crisis, as well as the absence of adequate state intervention do not contribute to resolving the identified challenges.

More...
SPINoFACT 2020 - Monitoring of media, social networks and comments on online media during parliamentary elections in Montenegro in 2020
0.00 €

SPINoFACT 2020 - Monitoring of media, social networks and comments on online media during parliamentary elections in Montenegro in 2020

SPINoFACT 2020 - Monitoring of media, social networks and comments on online media during parliamentary elections in Montenegro in 2020

Author(s): Danijel Radević,Jelena Mijanović,Jelena Jovanović Marović,Dejana Ponoš,Vesna Rajković Nenadić,Radoš Mušović / Language(s): English

Keywords: Montenegro; media; marketing; politics; monitoring; 2020; online media;

The recently concluded parliamentary elections in Montenegro have brought a series of specificities to the election campaign. Instead of party rallies and door-to-door campaigns, the election race has largely shifted to traditional and new media. Thus, share and like have become a dominant feature of that competition, which was coloured by identity issues and emotional charge. In such an environment, the electoral lists marginalized specific economic programmes, issues of living standard of citizens, specific measures to combat corruption and fight against organized crime, and many other important topics. The two opposing narratives of “endangerment of the state” and “defence of the shrines” have suppressed also both the global threat of the COVID 19 virus pandemic and the worrying economic perspective. The media scene in Montenegro is deeply polarized and this rift is reflected in media coverage of the activities of political entities. Perhaps the most noticeable one daily was via front pages of the printed media, which were almost fan-edited. There was almost no media that reported neutrally and objectively on a certain electoral list, excluding the minority parties towards which a special kind of sensibility was expressed. The list „Decisively for Montenegro – DPS“ was represented in the media more than the three thus far opposition lists together („For the Future of Montenegro“, „Peace Is Our Nation“ and „Black On White“). At the same time, the DPS was the most attacked party, which is logical having in mind that it acted from the position of the government. Once again, the strong involvement of state officials in the campaign was not lacking, which the OSCE Monitoring Mission stated in its preliminary report as an „institutional advantage“. This was supported by the research of the Centre for Civic Education(CCE) through the analysis of media appearances of state officials who used these positions to promote the programmes of their parties and lists. Instead of changing the channel, the citizens of Montenegro preferred to click and scroll, and this is supported by the fact that over 65% of announcements about the elections were on online media, and the remainder on television and in printed media. However, the power of television as a still influential medium among the middle and older generation should not be neglected. Worrying, however, is the trend that approximately 50% of the analysed articles on online portals has had readers’ comments of controversial content, and there were examples that all comments on a certain text contained controversial content - from severe insults to hate speech. The comments comprise of insults to persons on national and gender grounds, but also insulting insinuations on personal grounds. Recently adopted legal solutions, following the initiative of the CCE, concerning comments on online media, must come to life in order to decontaminate the space of online comments from inappropriate content. In this election, Facebook has become perhaps a key arena where the battle for votes is taking place. Announcements have become more creative compared to all previous statements, and there is a visible greater investment in this form of political marketing. In particular, the growing influence of MEME pages is visible, which have openly classified themselves politically and have become agitators of certain political options. CCE has been monitoring election campaigns in the media for several election cycles, and this time on social networks as well and through comments from readers on portals. The objective of the project “SPINoFACT - monitoring of parliamentary elections in Montenegro 2020” is to contribute to the democratization and Europeanization of Montenegro by strengthening professional and independent media coverage. More precisely, the objective is to contribute to the fact-based informative value of media coverage of political campaigns and better informing citizens about the election offer for the 2020 parliamentary elections. We owe a special gratitude to the Embassy of the United Kingdom in Montenegro, which recognized the importance of this topic and supported it through the implementation of this project.

More...
Parliamentary elections in Montenegro - 2020 Election programmes of parties and coalitions
0.00 €

Parliamentary elections in Montenegro - 2020 Election programmes of parties and coalitions

Parliamentary elections in Montenegro - 2020 Election programmes of parties and coalitions

Author(s): Miloš Vukanović / Language(s): English

Keywords: Montenegro; media; politics; regulation; public broadcasting service; RTCG; political parties;

The most important factors at the root of the long-lasting and serious problems in Montenegrin media are the persistent attempts of the authorities to put media under their control. Overall, we can observe serious problems arising out of all three forms of censorship - hard, soft and self-censorship, compounded by deficiencies in the existing framework and practice of self-regulation and public regulation, and by political ‘subjugation’ of public broadcaster RTCG.

More...
Long road to justice - Reform of judiciary in Montenegro
0.00 €

Long road to justice - Reform of judiciary in Montenegro

Long road to justice - Reform of judiciary in Montenegro

Author(s): Vladimir Vučković,Mira Popović,Siniša Gazivoda / Language(s): English

Keywords: Montenegro; judiciary; reform; EU;

After eight years of accession negotiations with the EU, the judiciary is positioned as one of the key obstacles and there are no indications in which manner and how quickly the situation in this area will improve. The Constitution prescribes that the Parliament elect the Supreme State Prosecutor and four members of the Judicial Council (from among eminent lawyers) by a 2/3 majority of votes of all MPs (55 MPs) in the first round of voting, and a three-thirds majority (49 MPs) in the second round. This majority remains unattainable for a long time period, which reflects on the ongoing interim state in the prosecution, and the questionable legitimacy and legality of the work of the current composition of the Judicial Council, some of whose members have long expired. Since October 2019, the head of the Supreme State Prosecutor’s Office has been the Acting Supreme State Prosecutor, and out of 15 basic and high prosecutor’s offices, 11 of them are in the interim state, including those working for the largest number of citizens (Higher State Prosecutor’s Office in Podgorica and Basic State Prosecutor’s Office in Podgorica). The problems in the judiciary are explicitly indicated by the European Commission, but this is not accompanied by a sense of responsibility in the judiciary itself, as evidenced, inter alia, by the repeatedly highlighted multiple, unconstitutional and illegal mandates of the President of the Supreme Court and many other courts. There are very high expectations regarding the judiciary, as the third branch of government, in addition to the legislative and executive branches in the ongoing process of negotiations with the European Union. This refers in particular to the obligations arising from Chapter 23, which, along with Chapter 24, represents the starting and ending point of Montenegro’s negotiations with the EU, but also of the overall reform processes in the country. However, the reluctance of decision-makers at the political level in Montenegro, but also lack of independence of the judiciary from political leaders and related impacts, along with the inconsistency of the EU in insisting on meeting the benchmarks that reform the judiciary has led to stagnation and in some respects regression in Montenegrin judicial reform. It remains to be seen whether the new parliamentary composition will have the capacity for dialogue to find a widely acceptable solution for the new Supreme State Prosecutor and for new members of the Judicial Council elected among eminent lawyers. It also remains to be seen whether the judiciary has well understood the previous messages from the EU and the burden that some of their leaders represent for the further Europeanization of Montenegro, i.e. whether some of them will withdraw and whether others will change the current approach to make justice attainable within the Montenegrin framework for all those seeking it through the judicial system. Montenegro’s path to the EU will significantly depend on the speed and quality of these processes, but also on the overall process of establishing a functional rule of law in the country.

More...
Fast forward human rights! - A brief overview of supported projects
0.00 €

Fast forward human rights! - A brief overview of supported projects

Fast forward human rights! - A brief overview of supported projects

Author(s): / Language(s): English

Keywords: Montenegro; human rights; supported projects;

Cases of discrimination, intolerance and violations of the rights of citizens are not rare in Montenegro, but are rarely adequately prosecuted, despite the existence of numerous institutions dealing with development of policies and legal framework for protection of human rights. Human rights are one of the programme pillars of the Centre for Civic Education (CCE) and the Civic Initiatives (CI) from Belgrade, who have so far conducted numerous successful projects in the area of education for human rights, campaigns for raising public awareness, initiatives for amendment of legislation, etc. This was a basis of a joint project Fast Forward Human Rights! Through this project CCE and CI have continued qualitatively developing the existing programmes, with the financial support of the European Union and within the framework of the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights 2013 (EIDHR), from November 2013 to January 2015, but have also introduced some new answers to the need of providing a more effective contribution to the development of the culture of human rights in Montenegro. The objective of the project was strengthening of the role of civil society in promoting human rights and democratic reforms in Montenegro, and providing support to peaceful conciliation of group interests as well as consolidating political participation and representation of citizens. The specific objective of the project was improving monitoring and protection of human rights in Montenegro through increased and active participation of civil society organizations. Action formatted in such a way falls within the framework of Guidelines for EU support to civil society in enlargement countries 2014-2020 of the Directorate General for Enlargement of the European Commission, which underlines that civil society organizations must strengthen “their effectiveness by increasing their capacity for analysis, monitoring and advocacy, as well as networking, partnership, coalition building, and active participation in politics and processes of adoption of the law”. And in order to tackle the changes, developed organizational capacities are necessary, as well as a clear strategic direction, and certainly, stable sources of funding. Therefore, these changes represent the greatest challenge for civil society organizations that have failed to reach the required level of building/strengthening of their capacities, creating/defining the strategic direction and ensuring financial stability of their programmes. Activities of relevant civil society organizations in the area of human rights are important, since reforms in democratization of Montenegro cannot and should not be conducted only by institutions, but require involvement of all social sectors. Hence, the project Fast Forward Human Rights! also aimed at providing direct support to civil society organizations of different development levels, by allocation of financial resources for implementation of projects in local communities, by strengthening their capacities for the purpose of successful implementation of projects in accordance with the European rules, and by providing continuous consultations during the project duration. In this manner, organizations which are not direct beneficiaries of EIDHR in Montenegro have acquired knowledge and skills about human rights and advocating for human rights, as well as about management of projects from EU funds, which represent the real sources of financing in the future and a possibility for ensuring financial sustainability of their programmes.

More...
Public officials and prevention of corruption - a practical manual
0.00 €

Public officials and prevention of corruption - a practical manual

Javni funkcioneri i prevencija korupcije - praktični priručnik

Author(s): Dijana Đukanović,Dušica Rečević,Marko Škerović,Ljiljana Jušković / Language(s): Montenegrine

Keywords: public officials; corruption prevention; asset declaration; conflict of Interest; transparency

This is a manual that explains the legally prescribed obligations of public officials in order to combat corruption. It consists of three thematic units - income and property, conflict of interest and lobbying - in which clear and practical explanations and instructions are offered through questions and answers. Since legal provisions are subject to change, the electronic form of this manual will be regularly updated.

More...
Guide for those subject to the Law on Free Access to Information
0.00 €

Guide for those subject to the Law on Free Access to Information

Vodič za obveznike Zakona o slobodnom pristupu informacijama

Author(s): Mira Popović Trstenjak,Itana Gogić / Language(s): Montenegrine

Keywords: Transparency; Accountability; Public Access; Governance; Legal Framework

Free access to information is one of the mechanisms that significantly affects good governance, ensuring transparency and accountability of public administration.

More...
MPs and Interns must perform much better
0.00 €

MPs and Interns must perform much better

MPs and Interns must perform much better

Author(s): Nikola Mirković / Language(s): English

Keywords: parliament; elections; plenary sessions; State Election Commission

When it comes to the activity of MPs of the 28th convocation of the Parliament in plenary sessions, the first half of the year was marked by the dominance of more experienced MPs, while the impression is gained that the new forces have been “overwhelmed” by stage fright. As many as five MPs did not speak even once. These are Uglješa Urošević, Seid Hadžić, Gordan Stojović, and Nađa Laković from PES, and Artan Čobi from the Albanian Alternative, with the note that three out of these five MPs began their mandate in mid-November 2023, precisely on 16 November 2023, when the State Election Commission (SEC) confirmed their mandates as they replaced party colleagues who joined the Government. This applies to Stojović, Laković, and Čobi, while Urošević and Hadžić, therefore, since the beginning of the convocation on 27 July 2023, citizens who followed the plenary sessions could not hear their voices.

More...
Well-Paid Extras’ Roles on the Parliamentary Stage
0.00 €

Well-Paid Extras’ Roles on the Parliamentary Stage

Well-Paid Extras’ Roles on the Parliamentary Stage

Author(s): Nikola Mirković / Language(s): English

Keywords: Parliament of Montenegro; parliamentary elections; Members of Parliament; Democratic Party of Socialists; Socialist People's Part; Labour Party; Bosniak Party

The constitutive session of the 27th convocation of the Parliament of Montenegro took place on 23 September 2020. This was preceded by parliamentary elections held on 30 August 2020, which resulted in significant changes in the political landscape and, consequently, in the structure of the Parliament of Montenegro. Specifically, the Parliament at that time entered 30 Members of Parliament (MPs) from the Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS-LP), followed by 27 MPs of the coalition "For the Future of Montenegro" (New Serbian Democracy, Democratic People's Party, Socialist People's Party, Labour Party, True Montenegro, United Montenegro), 11 MPs of the coalition "Peace is Our Nation" (Democratic Montenegro and DEMOS), four MPs of the coalition "Black on White" (URA and Civis), three MPs each from the Social Democrats (SD) and the Bosniak Party (BS), two MPs of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), and one MP each from the Albanian Coalition "Unanimously" and the Albanian List.The constitutive session of the 27th convocation of the Parliament of Montenegro took place on 23 September 2020. This was preceded by parliamentary elections held on 30 August 2020, which resulted in significant changes in the political landscape and, consequently, in the structure of the Parliament of Montenegro. Specifically, the Parliament at that time entered 30 Members of Parliament (MPs) from the Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS-LP), followed by 27 MPs of the coalition "For the Future of Montenegro" (New Serbian Democracy, Democratic People's Party, Socialist People's Party, Labour Party, True Montenegro, United Montenegro), 11 MPs of the coalition "Peace is Our Nation" (Democratic Montenegro and DEMOS), four MPs of the coalition "Black on White" (URA and Civis), three MPs each from the Social Democrats (SD) and the Bosniak Party (BS), two MPs of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), and one MP each from the Albanian Coalition "Unanimously" and the Albanian List.

More...
Gender pulse of the media in the election campaign
0.00 €

Gender pulse of the media in the election campaign

Gender pulse of the media in the election campaign

Author(s): Milica Zindović,Damir Nikočević,Jelena Jovanović Marović,Dajana Zečević,Danijel Radević,Olivera Komar,Dejana Ponoš,Mirjana Ivanović Bošković / Language(s): English

Keywords: gender equality; media; elections; representation; discrimination

In election cycles, people mostly remember only the results, while the content of the campaign in terms of key messages and electoral programmes is rarely retained. Issues of gender equality also remain on the margins, which, unfortunately, is indicated by the recent extraordinary parliamentary elections in Montenegro held on 11 June 2023. The issue of gender equality, as well as the relationship between political parties and the media, significantly shapes social reality. Objective and non-discriminatory public informing about electoral processes is extremely important for strengthening the overall political culture. Through the project “SPINoFACT 7 – Media Monitoring of 2023 Parliamentary Elections in Montenegro with focus on Gender Perspective” implemented by the Centre for Civic Education (CCE), with the support of the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany in Montenegro, the aim was to bring gender-responsible media reporting into the public spotlight as part of encouraging the political participation of women, especially in light of the growing misogyny in Montenegro, which already has a chilling effect on women’s engagement in matters of public importance.

More...
Who does Montenegro choose?
0.00 €

Who does Montenegro choose?

Who does Montenegro choose?

Author(s): Mirjana Radulović / Language(s): English

Keywords: elections; candidates; electoral lists; demographics; transparency

Early parliamentary elections will be held on 11 June 2023. Total of 15 electoral lists are participating, with a total of 1113 candidates who will compete for 81 parliamentary seat. The main objective of this research is to provide a cross-section of those electoral lists in terms of gender, age, and regional and professional structure of the candidates so that citizens and the interested public have a deeper cross-section of the electoral offer in that aspect. The data has been processed in a manner that does not reveal personal data about candidates for MPs and provides all the relevant information set by the research task.

More...
Result 221-231 of 231
  • Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ...
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12

About

CEEOL is a leading provider of academic eJournals, eBooks and Grey Literature documents in Humanities and Social Sciences from and about Central, East and Southeast Europe. In the rapidly changing digital sphere CEEOL is a reliable source of adjusting expertise trusted by scholars, researchers, publishers, and librarians. CEEOL offers various services to subscribing institutions and their patrons to make access to its content as easy as possible. CEEOL supports publishers to reach new audiences and disseminate the scientific achievements to a broad readership worldwide. Un-affiliated scholars have the possibility to access the repository by creating their personal user account.

Contact Us

Central and Eastern European Online Library GmbH
Basaltstrasse 9
60487 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main HRB 102056
VAT number: DE300273105
Phone: +49 (0)69-20026820
Email: info@ceeol.com

Connect with CEEOL

  • Join our Facebook page
  • Follow us on Twitter
CEEOL Logo Footer
2025 © CEEOL. ALL Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of use | Accessibility
ver2.0.428
Toggle Accessibility Mode

Login CEEOL

{{forgottenPasswordMessage.Message}}

Enter your Username (Email) below.

Institutional Login