Vojenské rozhledy – jak dál (Případ rozhodovací analýzy)
Military Review: How to Continue (The Case of Decision-Making Analysis)
Author(s): František OchranaSubject(s): Library operations and management, Security and defense, Social Theory
Published by: Univerzita obrany - Centrum bezpečnostních a vojenskostrategických studií
Keywords: Target Group; Setting Change Goals; Fixing Variants; Evaluation Criteria; Military Science; Professional Peer-Reviewed Journal; Peer-Review Process; SCOPUS Journals
Summary/Abstract: This polemics is written by Prof. Fr. Ochrana, both reader and author of the Military Review quarterly. It is a response to the article in No 4, 2013, by Vl. Karaffa, editorial board chairman. Prof. Ochrana generally supports his conclusions concerning the further survival of this Czech Military Review. According to him, the review has indispensable role in the spectrum of both civilian and military professional journals. He recommends to evaluate the problem of its existence upon the principles of cost/benefit analysis, with regard to the so-called socials costs, the key steps of which he enumerates.
Journal: Vojenské rozhledy
- Issue Year: 23/2014
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 178-187
- Page Count: 10
- Language: Czech