INTERPRETATION OF THE KAMPALA AMENDMENTS – ONE OF THE KEY ISSUES FOR ACTIVATING THE JURISDICTION OF THE ICC OVER THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION Cover Image

INTERPRETATION OF THE KAMPALA AMENDMENTS – ONE OF THE KEY ISSUES FOR ACTIVATING THE JURISDICTION OF THE ICC OVER THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION
INTERPRETATION OF THE KAMPALA AMENDMENTS – ONE OF THE KEY ISSUES FOR ACTIVATING THE JURISDICTION OF THE ICC OVER THE CRIME OF AGGRESSION

Author(s): GÂLEA Ion
Subject(s): Politics / Political Sciences, Social Sciences, Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Essay|Book Review |Scientific Life
Published by: Editura Universitatii Petrol-Gaze din Ploiesti
Keywords: International Criminal Court; crime of aggression; jurisdiction; State consent; Kampala Amendment

Summary/Abstract: This study proposes an overview over one of the most contentious questions of interpretation linked to the Kampala Amendment on crime of aggression. The question concerns whether whether the ICC would have jurisdiction in case of an alleged act of aggression commited by a State Party to the Rome Statute which has not ratified/accepted the Kampala Amendment against the territory of a State Party which has ratified/accepted the Amendment. The study exposes the two opposite views and tries to identify the correct question. Moreover, a very brief assesment of the interpretative approach is provided.

  • Issue Year: 1/2017
  • Issue No: 7
  • Page Range: 175-191
  • Page Count: 17
  • Language: English
Toggle Accessibility Mode