The Possibility of Conducting Experiments on Animals. Moral Theologian’s Reflections Cover Image

The Possibility of Conducting Experiments on Animals. Moral Theologian’s Reflections
The Possibility of Conducting Experiments on Animals. Moral Theologian’s Reflections

Author(s): Krzysztof Smykowski
Subject(s): Philosophy, Ethics / Practical Philosophy
Published by: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
Keywords: 3R rule; experiments on animals; moral theology

Summary/Abstract: The purpose of my article is to present and analyze the ethical views of Gary Francione – the leading, contemporary representative of Animal Rights Movement. He built his theory by criticizing the views of two other supporters of the idea of animal liberation: Peter Singer and Tom Regan. In his opinion, neither of these philosophers did not escape from the anthropocentric paradigm binding the moral obligations to animals with the primacy of human interest. Singer believed that only humans have the ability to plan their own future, and only they want to live and extend their own existence. While according to Regan, in conflict situations, respect for human interest should be dominant. Francione agrees that only people understand a deeper meaning of their own existence, but it does not follow that only they want to live and do not want to die. The need to preserve and continue the life is not the result of mental states, but it is a consequence of sensitivity – the biological trait which aims to safeguard and continuation of life. According to Francione, if every sensitive creature has an interest in preserving his own life and avoiding of suffering it they also have a moral right to life and not being treated in a cruel manner.

  • Issue Year: 13/2015
  • Issue No: 2
  • Page Range: 107-119
  • Page Count: 13
  • Language: English