FLEXIBLE METACOGNITION: FROM DIRECT ENGAGEMENT AND DISTANCING TO REGULATION AND REINTEGRATION
FLEXIBLE METACOGNITION: FROM DIRECT ENGAGEMENT AND DISTANCING TO REGULATION AND REINTEGRATION

Summary/Abstract: Metacognition supports learning, decision-making, and self-regulation; however, increased self-monitoring is not intrinsically adaptive. Monitoring may be inaccurate, cognitively costly, or rigid, and may thereby interfere with skilled performance, effective action, and interpersonal functioning. This critical integrative narrative review synthesises research on metacognitive monitoring and control, automatic and deliberate processing, skilled performance, rumination, perfectionism, and overcontrol. A purposively assembled corpus of 128 potentially relevant publications was examined, of which 56 formed the core conceptual synthesis; a targeted update through 1 July 2026 was used to refine construct boundaries and incorporate recent evidence. The review distinguishes metacognitive distancing—a temporary shift from direct engagement to observing and, where relevant, evaluating one’s own mental activity—from flexible metacognition, defined as the context-sensitive regulation of the initiation, intensity, function, and termination of such monitoring. The proposed cycle comprises direct engagement, distancing, regulation, and reintegration. Reintegration denotes the incorporation of selected metacognitive information into ongoing action while explicit self-monitoring recedes. The framework is positioned in relation to metareasoning, cognitive flexibility, psychological flexibility, and regulatory flexibility. Its adaptive value is hypothesised to depend on cue relevance, judgement calibration, proportionality of control, and successful return to the primary activity. The model is theoretical and heuristic rather than neuroanatomical or clinical, and its proposed dimensions require empirical validation.

• Details
• Contents