The "End of Writing" Myth and Hybrid Models of Learning: Balancing Digital and Analogue as a Challenge for the Education System
The "End of Writing" Myth and Hybrid Models of Learning: Balancing Digital and Analogue as a Challenge for the Education System

Summary/Abstract: Recent debates in education often describe digitalization as the “end of writing” or the decline of literacy. This paper challenges that view, arguing instead that digital transformation reshapes literacy into hybrid forms where analogue and digital practices coexist. The study analyzes the interrelations between analogue and digital modes of learning, examining how their balanced integration can enhance cognitive development and educational equity in the post-digital era. Combining critical review with insights from the anthropology of the word and linguistic practices, this study draws on qualitative findings, educational reports, and policy documents to contextualize emerging hybrid learning models. The analysis shows that analogue competencies such as handwriting, deep reading, memorization, and mental calculation remain essential for cognitive grounding and comprehension. At the same time, overreliance on commercial digital infrastructures risks deepening inequalities, weakening public oversight, and encouraging superficial, automation-dependent learning. Two conceptual frameworks are proposed: new lecto-orality, which highlights the continuity of oral, written, and digital practices, and the Digital Lowest Common Denominator (DLCD), which promotes accessible, sustainable and pedagogically driven digital tools. The paper advocates for a hybrid educational paradigm that integrates analogue and digital learning through a capacity-first approach, supporting “analogue education for students, media education for teachers”. Such an approach strengthens critical thinking and resilience to technological obsolescence.

• Details
• Contents