We kindly inform you that, as long as the subject affiliation of our 300.000+ articles is in progress, you might get unsufficient or no results on your third level or second level search. In this case, please broaden your search criteria.
The aim of the article is to present two opposing visions of the common good (value) in the history of political and legal doctrines. Such outline of extreme positions allows the author to assess the wide range of doctrinal differences in particular epochs and to impose the principles of the rule of law expressed in art. 2 of the Constitution in the historical tradition derived from the ancient republicanism and political and legal thought of the Middle Ages and which absorbs the postulates of modern liberalism, republicanism and conservatism, based on the democratic model.
More...
The article discusses equitable law with reference to the perspective of the system of statutory law. The author founds the substantive theory of equitable law on the following values: truth, good, justice and human dignity. The paper defines the understanding of these values. Then, it indicates that they should be respected in legislative activities (in lawmaking) as well as in the application of law so that the law (norms) and decisions should be equitable. It is also emphasised that equity is “an instance” that can protect the man and his dignity – the dignity of the human person.
More...
Realization of the right involves "transforming the rule of law - as a theoretical concept ‒in the real social relations", a work which takes two forms: making the law enforcement activity and compliance with laws and conducting law by applying legal norms by state bodies.
More...
Komplexitás, modellértékűség: eszmények, korlátok
Science is the systematic processing of knowledge on the world, sensed by human perception. The humanities, as peculiar part of scholarship, are based on the generalisation of historical experience. While scientific knowledge tends to get generalised, experience is particular from the beginning: it is defined from wherever and whenever it has been gained (or by what has been experienced hic et nunc), so it is limited in generalisability. As a subject of legal scholarship, law is (1) a global phenomenon embracing society as a whole, which is (2) able to settle conflicts of interests that emerge in social practice as fundamental, while (3) prevailing as the supreme controlling factor in society. Law – taken as (a) normatively considered social behaviour, (b) positivation, (c) decision making and/or enforcement by the authority, as well as (d) their commentary/doctrine – is an accessory subject of legal scholarship at the most; in no way it is an internal part thereof.Based on experience – as to its ideal type, best exemplified by the English tradition – legal scholarship is historical and comparative, directed by theoretical considerations. Systemically developed concepts, principles and institutions, ready to generalisation – best exemplified by the Latinic/Germanic tradition – can only be built on the former.All its foundation is provided by the ideal of ordo, developed by the world concept of the given society/culture. In its concretisation, particular legal sciences are formulating notions, principles and institutions. This is textual analysis in so much the inquiry is historical; this is empiric in so much it is of a social scientific character. Their scholarly developed connection is at the level of “legal science” only provided that it transcends the accidentality and practice-dependent variety of individual legal cultures and national laws. No law in books or action can be more relevant to it than any engineered product to exact sciences, for all these are nothing but parts of practical action or the policy thereof.Jurisprudence, taken as the conceptual modelling of a part of reality, is a historical offspring of the ideal of scientia materialised first in geometry and second in theology. Or, it is a kind of theoretical doctrine: potential and competitive, albeit organised into a coherent system. And as the humanities in general, it is at the same time an ideal-type reflection and form-giving factor – that is, genuine artificer – of the man’s world.
More...
The purpose of this study is to review the role of the University of Kolozsvár in renewal of Hungarian legal philosophical thinking. So that will be presented the activity of Viktor Jenei, Rudolf Werner, Bódog Somló, Gyula Moór, Barna Horváth, István Bibó, József Szabó in Kolozsvár.
More...
The question of legal education is recognised as important along various dimensions and thus has been in the focus of attention of numerous distinguished legal scholars and practitioners all over the world. The problem of legal education includes not just methodological issues, but also the issues that are par excellence philosophical in nature. Legal education has a specificity that arises from the nature of law and its complexity, and is related to the personal dimension of this education. The process of education should be organised in such a way that students should be in contact with members of the legal community whose authority, moral and subject matter-related attributes play a vital, formative role in legal education. The author tries to confront the didactics-related reality with ideals and postulates present within this field. Yet, it is revealed that such a reality is hidden below a “thick layer” of myths, which have grown around legal education. These myths blur the real picture of lawyers’ education, creating a kind of legal education mythology. Two types of systemic legal myths are indicated. The first one is built on the paradigm of university legal education. The other type is based on the paradigm of university studies.
More...
The article provides criticism of theory and method proposed in the monograph of prof. Alfonsas Vaišvila. The author of this article has a notion that a research work proposing particular conception, theory or method may be evaluated taking into account the following aspects: to what extent the provided conceptual constructs are systematically completed, comprehensive and suitable for use, as well, how precisely, interesting, informative and originally the material reasoning and explaining the ideas is submitted. Hence, the criticism of the monograph provided for in the article is based on evaluation of adaptability and versatility of the proposed constructs, as well doubts arising during the analysis whether the construction of the conception is correct (first of all, the reasoning, and at the same time – reliability). Upon the discussing in detail particular shortcomings of the monograph, the conclusion is that the material provided is not convincing upon any of the previously mentioned aspects. Notwithstanding the declared aim, the work fails to provide a solid systematic theory. Although the method is proposed, too many exceptions are to be made. It is very important, that these exceptions seem to be formulated in a rather arbitrary way. The proposed method also lacks freshness, as it repeats and develops not only the previous publications of the author of the monograph, but as well ideas of other authors (particularly, of Karl Marx and Rudolf von Jhering). And the “achievements” of states which apply (for example, China) or which did apply the method are not inspiring at all (at least in the field of human rights). Evaluating the presentation of the material it was noticed that the work is penetrated with personal attitudes and contains factual mistakes, inaccuracies and other indecorums. Although there are some new, interesting elements, they do not prevail. As well, it is very important that the monograph raises additional ethical doubts, related with stimulation of intolerance and discrimination, which significantly reduces the versatility of outlook of the proposed conception (particularly the authentic application thereof). Presumably the majority of supporters of contemporary human rights concept will regard the conception of prof. Alfonsas Vaišvila as merely unacceptable.
More...
According to the Roman legal principle: “Semel heres semper heres”. However, the renunciation of inheritance is one of the few institutions of inheritance law, which were not known in Roman law. There are situations in life in which the testator would like to deprive the shares in the inheritance a person with whom he lives in the best possible relations. When there are no grounds for disinheritance of the child, you can try to persuade them to renounce their inheritance. This article is about renunciation of inheritance in Polish legal order. The author will examine in this article the individual elements constructing this agreement. Disputes outlined in considerations may be helped for a discussion on the need for changes in normative regulations on research issues.
More...
This article discusses different legal solutions to situations referred to as „aberratio ictus“, in terms of its particular manifestation in criminal law. The concept of aberratio ictus, that can be translated as „attack gone astray“ is used to determine criminal responsibility of the offender, when his actions, directed to committing a specific offence, abberate from the expected course of events, resulting in harming an unintended object. Doctrinal solutions in this area variate between the theory of equivalence and the theory of concretisation, both of which impose exclusive arguments regarding the object of the intent. Thus, the first one emphasises the protection of abstract values, that results in punishing the offender for the completed, intentional offence, despite the aberration. On the other hand, the reasoning behind the theory of concretisation takes into account the relevance of the specific identification regarding the object of intent. According to this view, the offender is liable for the attempt towards the first object, accompanied with negligence liability for the result. It can be noticed that the legal nature of the protected objects appears as a decisive circumstance for determining criminal responsibility. Unlike the situations when the mentioned objects are not of equal values, where there is no doubt that aberratio ictus involves the responsibility consisting of the attempted offence, in addition to negligence towards the actual result, the equivalence of the attacked and harmed object, causes divergent opinions among different authors in legal theory. This affects not only the legal solutions in positive criminal law, which are mainly based on general rules, but also the judicial practice in this area, that is evidently not unique. Also, it can not be negated that these solutions are based on valuative criteria, giving the advantage to one value versus the other. After analyzing the application of suggested theories in practice and comparative legal solutions, the author pleads in favour of the attempt model, based on the theory of concretisation, suggesting the possiblity of its legal regulation in serbian criminal law. Its advantages are therefore attached to better concordance with practical demands and main principles of criminal law in general.
More...
C’est étonnant comme les principes hegeliennes de la philosophie du droit, développés par Hegel, dans un manuel qui a franchi l’aula de l’Université et s’a adressé, alors, dans le milieu du XIXème siècle, en même temps, au monde scientifique et au public, soient tant simples ! Il s’agit de l’ossature juridique de la réalité et de l’État, d’une série d’éléments de droit naturel et de science de l’État, que le grand philosophe les construise dans une architecture philosophique exacte, rigoureuse, mais subtile et profonde, spécifique de la méthode élaborée déjà dans la Science de la logique. Certainement, Hegel, dans son entier démarche, a en vue, aussi, une catégorie de confrontation entre des certaines vérités et d’autres vérités de même façon, qui sont répandues de autres parts. Mais dans le droit et dans l’éthique de l’État, la vérité est aussi vieille comme il est relevé dans la morale publique et en religion. Relire les principes de lesquels écrivait Hegel dans l’époque des lumières est, croyons-nous, bénéfique pour la complexité d’aujourd’hui du notre monde juridique et de ses interconnexions avec le reste de l’humanité.
More...
This study tries to give a general framework about justice. For this aim, it discusses the etimological dimensions of the word of adalet, justice; and it is attempted to confirm the various senses of this word by referring some relevant verses in Quran. Following that, the concept is discussed in details in the relationship between Ethics and Law. In the second part of the article, it is referred to the unity of reason and heart in Quran, mentioning a justice in the Islamic sense. It takes some relevant verses contain particular judgements about justice to reach the objectivizations of it. It is concluded that justice is one of the most important parts of Islam and the consciousness, adding it is an eternal and ideal value.
More...
The article analyses the claims based on Article 446 Civil code in case of a suicide assassination. At the beginning it shows the issues of inheritance of property rights and obligations in case of death of a decedent. Next, it focuses on the possibility of inheritance property obligations of the suicide assassin towards the next of kin of the victim of the assassination. At the end it presents a solution for the case where claims under Article 446 Civil code are not satisfied.
More...
This paper examines the Hanafi scholars’ approach to the alluded meaning (isharat al-nass) of a legislative text, and the implications of such an approach for the legal norms the Hanafis derived through ijtihad. The first part of the paper discusses the issue of possible textual indications (al-dalalat) within a legislative text, and then the concept of allusion in the Hanafi School from the linguistic and terminological point of view. Providing the examples of alluded meaning we show the way in which the Hanafis used alluded meanings in their argumentation. We also elaborate on the status of isharat al-nass in the Hanafi Madhab, and the way of giving preference in case of contradiction between isharat al-nass and ibarat al-nass. At the end of the paper we provide the conclusions derived from the study.
More...
The paper examines the question under what conditions amnesty laws can be justified for the sake of peace, and what those conditions may imply in the case of Kosovo’s amnesty law directed at its northern break-away region. It appraises the moral justifications of amnesty laws, their international legal justification, and the political context and logic behind them so to test the hypothesis that peace at the expense of justice can be justified, in this case through Serbia’s and Kosovo’s integration into the European Union (EU). Amnesty laws are found to be balancing acts between political expediency, moral considerations and the international legal order. In North Kosovo’s case, the law risks undermining an already weak rule of law, exacerbating preexisting corruption, while failing to resolve tensions between its questionable political expediency, dubious morality and doubtful international legality.
More...
The journal Annals of the West University of Timisoara – Law Series is a periodical comprehensive publication in law, biannually published, edited by the Faculty of Law, West University of Timisoara. The journal is structured according to sections that reflect the scientific work of several valuable professors in the field of private law and public law, plus the contributions of doctoral students or other young researchers.
Scientific events organized by the Faculty of Law, West University of Timisoara, as well as events marking the recognition of the scientific activity of its academic body, such as awards and distinctions, are also presented within the pages of the journal. Moreover, the journal’s content reflects the achievements of the Doctoral School within the Faculty of Law, West University of Timisoara.
The editorial team consists of professors specialized in the fundamental fields of law. A body of specialists ensures a comprehensive overview of the studies received for publication.
The journal is edited under the auspices of Universul Juridic Publishing House, one of the most prestigious law-oriented publishing houses in Romania.
More...
This paper is about the roots of computerized predictive analysis of judge’s behavior, and it investigates problems which predictive analysis is facing today, its prospects, as well as advantages and limits of that method. The author is of opinion that major limitation in predicting behavior of a judge with broad precision is emotional shortage of artificial intelligence. Following the line of legal realism the author concludes that unpredictability of judge’s behavior, namely specific and unique feature of their personalities, makes legal outcome not completely certain. Algorithms are today based mostly upon mechanical jurisprudence and syllogistic reasoning as computers are “fed” by man. In the future it might become possible, due to dynamic development of technology and with possibility of developing self-learned artificial intelligence, that machines could once replace judges or at least predict rulings with a very high percentage of probability. But, if the law is ars boni et aequi, and that ancient Roman postulate is not yet validly contested, then the range of mechanical jurisprudence is still limited. Machine may be able to gain equality, as it is basically and originally a mathematical principle and operation. But it cannot reach sensitivity of the second, correspondingly important, or even more fundamental legal principle – what is good in general and in concrete case. Good is a value, having its specific loading and feature in every single case. This is something that the machine cannot properly recognize and measure.
More...
Conclusions by analogy are common in all areas of human activities, including law. Conclusion by analogy in law can be reduced prima facie to the same form as the conclusion by analogy in general i.e. two premises and a conclusion. However, it differs from analogical conclusion in general, because one premise in law conclusion must be normative (not only factual). Researches into analogical conclusions (in general and in law) have been done from many aspects and by a number of authors. There is a consensus only on an elementary form, and it is founded on the similarity of two objects (two features) in some characteristics, which draws a conclusion that these objects (features) are similar in some of their features. When it comes to analogy in law, there are four types of analogies: A statutory analogy (analogia legis), law analogy (analogia iuris), the inter legem analogy, and an analogy we use in law of precedents. These analogies are utilized to interpret legal norms and the loopholes in the law are closed (with exception of criminal law where there are no loopholes). This becomes both particularly interesting and disputable when it comes to legal principles.
More...
The subject of the article is the analysis of a specific feature of contemporary political and administrative power. As analytic categories the author uses Foucaultian concepts of power discourses: sovereignty: the type of individualized power which strives for self-conservation (pre-modern type of power) and governmentality – the type of non-individualized power the aims of which are control and management of the population (modern type of power). Contemporary power – the bureaucratic power described by M. Weber etc. – seems to be the type of governmentality. But in this field emerges a new type of sovereign power legitimized by the discourse of governmentality – management and protection of the population. Its examples are analysed by G. Agemben i J. Butler indefinite detention in Guantanamo. In this articles, the author focuses on symptoms of the new type of sovereignty in day-to day government action – the practice of the polish organ of compulsory social insurance – Social Insurance Institution (Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych).
More...