Uvodna reč

Author(s): / Language(s): English,Serbian Issue: 3/2014

The „New Serbian anthropology“ project has a dual purpose. One is to represent the development and constitution of Serbian anthropology, and the other is, through the choice of papers which represent it, to display it to a wider audience. The initiators of the project, prof. dr Ivan Kova!evi and his associates (Dragana Antonijević, Ana Banić, Marija Brujić, Ildiko Erdei, Ljiljana Gavrilović, Vladimira Ilić, Ljubica Milosavljević, Marija Ristivojević, Danijel Sinani, Mladen Stajić and Bojan Žikić), have envisioned two modes of presentation of new Serbian anthropology. The first type will be the editing of thematic volumes of articles published over the course of the last four decades and comprise the basis of the transformed discipline. These volumes will be presented electronically on the website www.anthroserbia.org. The other type will be the publishing of reviews which would give the wider reading public an insight into the development of certain subgenres of anthropology. With this in mind, Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology has created a special section titled “New Serbian Anthropology” in which, in the coming issues, such reviews will be published

Уводни думи

Author(s): Mihail Meltev / Language(s): Bulgarian Issue: 1/2013

Маршъл Маклуън – афоризми

Author(s): / Language(s): Bulgarian Issue: 1/2013

Fântână nesecată de înţelepciune şi mângâiere

Author(s): Andrei Andreicuţ / Language(s): Romanian Issue: 06/2016

The text briefly highlights the personality profile of Metropolitan Nicolae Colan, Bishop of Cluj, a great scholar and professor of theology, Minister of National Education for a while, academician, a man devoted to the Church and filled with love for God’s Word. It was the only Orthodox hierarch who shepherded during the Vienna Diktat (1940-1944).

ABREVIERI

Author(s): / Language(s): Romanian Issue: 1/2013

Abbreviations

Editorial

Author(s): Asbjørn Grønstad,Henrik Gustafsson / Language(s): English Issue: 24/2015

Editorial

Author(s): Sue Norton / Language(s): English Issue: 25/2015

ТЕШИЋ ЗА 21. ВЕК

Author(s): Radmila Nastić / Language(s): Serbian Issue: 51/2013

Editorial

Author(s): Ana-Karina Schneider / Language(s): English Issue: 26/2016

Editorial

Author(s): Susan Flynn / Language(s): English Issue: 27/2016

MISIJA SIMPOZIJA

Author(s): Berislav Topić,Lidija Lincender-Cvijetić,Edin Muhić / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 3/2016

Editorial

Author(s): Petra Cepková / Language(s): English Issue: 1/2017

ОКРУГЛИ СТО АНДРЕЈ МИТРОВИЋ У ИСТОРИЈИ И КУЛТУРИ 20. ВЕКА

Author(s): Lela Vujošević / Language(s): Serbian Issue: 55/2014

Uz ovaj broj

Author(s): / Language(s): Bosnian,Croatian,German,Serbian Issue: 13/2013

Das Kompetenzzentrum für Öffentliches Recht hat in diesem Jahr von der Bearbeitung zweier Themen Abstand genommen: einerseits von der Bearbeitung des Staatseigentums und andererseits des Hohen Rates für Justiz und Staatsanwaltschaft. Der Grund dafür ist einfach: für jedes Thema hat sich von hunderten eingeladenen Anwälten, Richtern, Wissenschaftern, Juristen aus Ministerien und Professoren nur jeweils ein Referent angemeldet. Das Staatseigentum ist eine offene Frage in BuH, die mit der Entscheidung des Verfassungsgerichts von BuH lediglich initiiert wurde, während die Erörterung des Themas des Hohen Rates für Justiz und Staatsanwaltschaft eine gründliche Auseinandersetzung und Bewertung der Strukturen dieser Einrichtung und der immer offensichtlicheren Praxis voraussetzt, dass sie ihre eigenen Ansichten nach den Ideologemen der Politiker der Republika Srpska formuliert. Beide Themen haben eine bestimmte Haltung der Juristen provoziert, die eigentlich fachliche Lösungen hätten anbieten sollen. Letztlich hat sich Schweigen eingestellt.

Eessõna

Author(s): Author Not Specified / Language(s): Estonian Issue: 12/2015

Eessõna

Author(s): Author Not Specified / Language(s): Estonian Issue: 13/2016

Uz ovaj broj

Author(s): / Language(s): Bosnian,English,Croatian,Serbian Issue: 9/2012

U bilans pokušaja da se poboljša regionalno pravosuđe ulazi i ovaj broj Sveski. Autori iz Srbije analiziraju probleme reforme pravosuđa (Vesna Rakić-Vodinelić), reforme ustavnog sudstva (Vladan Petrov) i reizbora sudija (Savo Manojlović). Bosanskohercegovačka perspektiva se koncentrira na problem nezavisnosti Apelacionog odjeljenja Suda BiH (Maja Kapetanović). Nastavljamo, dakle, sa analizama koje traže formulu dobrog pravosuđa, sa analizama koje otvaraju ključno pitanje ustrojstva treće vlasti: kako uspostaviti pravosuđe koje će odgovoriti potrebi građana na pošteno suđenje?

Proslov

Author(s): Ivica Šarac / Language(s): Croatian Issue: 1/2017

RIJEČ NA POČETKU

Author(s): Husein Bašić / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 39-40/2008

Pojava »Almanaha«, časopisa koji će se baviti proučavanjem, prezentacijom i zaštitom kulturno-istorijske baštine Muslimana, Bošnjaka (otvoren je za kulturnu baštinu uopšte – kao univerzalnu vrijednost) – znači kakvutakvu mogućnost da se makar registruju i naznače elementarne kulturne vrijednosti muslimanskog naroda u Crnoj Gori i Srbiji, koji je sticajem tragičnih okolnosti ostao još više izolovan i usamljen, s nanovo raspirenom hipotekom »vječite krivice«, ali i one, nimalo lakše, koju mu već, kao težak kamen, vješaju o vrat uskovitlani nacionalistički korpusi, aktuelna vlast i njihovi mediji.

REKLI SU O BOŠNJACIMA

Author(s): Author Not Specified / Language(s): Bosnian Issue: 23-24/2003

Poznata je činjenica da su, osim kod Turaka, Albanaca i Mađara, koji su islamizirani južnoslovenski živalj uglavnom nazivali "Bošnjacima" (vidi: Evlija Čelebi, Putopis, Sarajevo 1996, str. 100, 121, 160, 179, 201, 211, 216, 234, 371, 381, 484, 487, 518, 524, 534, 548), ostali autori južnoslovenskog porijekla ovaj dio stanovništva najčešće imenovali "Turcima", "muhamedancima", "muslimanima", "Muslimanima", "Srbima" i, naravno poslije 1945., i "Crnogorcima" kao što ubjedljivo svjedoče mnogi od naprijed navedenih tekstova. Ali, sigurno je da ovaj dio stanovništva nikada nije bio drugačije imenovan u Crnoj Gori nego, na primjer, u Travniku, Banja Luci, Sarajevu, Novom Pazaru ili Mitrovici. Dakle, ako je imenovan kao "Turčin" u Podgorici, onda je on bio "Turčin" i u Sarajevu, Novom Pazaru ili Mitrovici, ako je imenovan kao "musliman", "muhamedanac" ili "Musliman" onda je svugdje imenovan kao takav. Zato je neutemeljeno tvrditi da je bilo kada, bilo koji dio "muslimana južnoslovenskog porijekla" na bivšem prostoru SFRJ, prepoznavan kao posebnost u odnosu na druge djelove istoga naroda kroz ime.