Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.
  • Log In
  • Register
CEEOL Logo
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • SUBJECT AREAS
  • PUBLISHERS
  • JOURNALS
  • eBooks
  • GREY LITERATURE
  • CEEOL-DIGITS
  • INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT
  • Help
  • Contact
  • for LIBRARIANS
  • for PUBLISHERS

Filters

Content Type

Keywords (17)

  • policy analysis (2)
  • Governance (1)
  • Public policy (1)
  • comparative studies (1)
  • convergence (1)
  • culture (1)
  • human securiry (1)
  • literature (1)
  • policy learning (1)
  • policy study (1)
  • politics (1)
  • public administration (1)
  • self-governance (1)
  • social policy (1)
  • Policy transfer (1)
  • Public Administration (1)
  • anniversary (1)
  • More...

Subjects (93)

  • Social Sciences (7)
  • Language and Literature Studies (7)
  • Economy (6)
  • Politics / Political Sciences (5)
  • Politics (4)
  • Political Theory (4)
  • Sociology (4)
  • Socio-Economic Research (4)
  • Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence (3)
  • Studies of Literature (3)
  • Civil Society (3)
  • Public Administration (3)
  • Theory of Literature (3)
  • EU-Legislation (3)
  • History (2)
  • Education (2)
  • Constitutional Law (2)
  • Civil Law (2)
  • Political Sciences (2)
  • Governance (2)
  • Public Law (2)
  • Communication studies (2)
  • Bulgarian Literature (2)
  • Polish Literature (2)
  • Russian Literature (2)
  • Public Finances (2)
  • Philology (2)
  • Gender Studies (1)
  • Literary Texts (1)
  • Fine Arts / Performing Arts (1)
  • Psychology (1)
  • Customs / Folklore (1)
  • Media studies (1)
  • Music (1)
  • Architecture (1)
  • Essay|Book Review |Scientific Life (1)
  • History of ideas (1)
  • Social history (1)
  • Gender history (1)
  • Comparative Study of Literature (1)
  • Albanian Literature (1)
  • Austrian Literature (1)
  • Belarussian Literature (1)
  • Bosnian Literature (1)
  • Croatian Literature (1)
  • Czech Literature (1)
  • Estonian Literature (1)
  • French Literature (1)
  • German Literature (1)
  • Greek Literature (1)
  • Hungarian Literature (1)
  • Latvian Literature (1)
  • Lithuanian Literature (1)
  • Montenegrine Literature (1)
  • Romanian Literature (1)
  • Serbian Literature (1)
  • Slovak Literature (1)
  • Slovenian Literature (1)
  • Turkish Literature (1)
  • Ukrainian Literature (1)
  • Other Language Literature (1)
  • Labor relations (1)
  • Welfare systems (1)
  • Politics and communication (1)
  • Politics and society (1)
  • Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology (1)
  • Culture and social structure (1)
  • Theory of Communication (1)
  • Applied Sociology (1)
  • Social Theory (1)
  • Book-Review (1)
  • Film / Cinema / Cinematography (1)
  • Law on Economics (1)
  • Translation Studies (1)
  • Human Resources in Economy (1)
  • Philosophy of Law (1)
  • Commercial Law (1)
  • History of Art (1)
  • British Literature (1)
  • American Literature (1)
  • More...

Authors (53)

  • Atanas Slavov (2)
  • Tatiana Tomova (2)
  • Aleksandar Marinov (2)
  • Milena Stefanova (2)
  • Todor Tanev (2)
  • Elena Kalfova (2)
  • Simeon Petrov (2)
  • Lyubimka Andreeva (2)
  • Maria Kotseva-Tikova (2)
  • Krassen Stanchev (1)
  • Boyka Ilieva (1)
  • Elena Azmanova-Rudarska (1)
  • Albena Vacheva (1)
  • Stiliyan Stoyanov (1)
  • Milkana Mochurova (1)
  • Jaroslav Dvorak (1)
  • Snežana Ilieva (1)
  • Tanya Stoyanova (1)
  • Metodi Ivanov (1)
  • Liudmila Guzikova (1)
  • Mariana Dimitrova (1)
  • Georgy Ganev (1)
  • Georgi Peev (1)
  • Boril Mechkov (1)
  • Yana Chakarova (1)
  • Fabrice Larat (1)
  • Andrei Velchev (1)
  • Kliment Naydenov (1)
  • Vladyslav Akulov-Muratov (1)
  • Petia Branzova (1)
  • Georgi Vuldjev (1)
  • Georgy Sarakostov (1)
  • Nikolai Valkanov (1)
  • Ognian Boyukliev (1)
  • Stoyan Panchev (1)
  • Venko Petkov (1)
  • Galina Stoyanova (1)
  • Georgi Temelkov (1)
  • Detelin Dimitrov (1)
  • Iskra Mileva (1)
  • Liliya Elenkova (1)
  • Mariela Yordanova (1)
  • Nikoleta Efremova (1)
  • Petya Krasteva (1)
  • Todor Izhbehov (1)
  • Albena Taneva (1)
  • Yordan Botev (1)
  • Denitsa Hinkova (1)
  • Aleko Djildjov (1)
  • Gabrielė Burbulytė – Tsiskarishvili (1)
  • Edita Stumbraitė-Vilkišienė (1)
  • Vacheva Albena (1)
  • Roman Hadzikosev (1)
  • More...

Languages

Legend

  • Journal
  • Article
  • Book
  • Chapter
  • Open Access

Publisher: Софийски университет »Св. Климент Охридски«

Result 1-16 of 16
Bulgarian Economic Papers

Bulgarian Economic Papers

Frequency: irregular and other / Country: Bulgaria

The Bulgarian Economic Papers (BEP) is an English-language working-paper series published by the Centre for Economic Theories and Policies at Sofia University.

The series focuses on all topics in economics and business administration with an emphasis on South Eastern Europe in particular and post-transition countries in general. We welcome submissions that either deal with empirical studies or use theoretical models. However, papers on other current topics are also welcomed.

Studies which blend economics and business administration and address practical implications relevant for public policy, business policy, or individual decision making are highly appreciated. We would also encourage young scholars to submit their work.

More...
Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum

Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum

Frequency: 1 issues / Country: Bulgaria

Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum is published by Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski and edited by the literary scholars of the Balkan Studies Masters and Doctoral Studies Program (Department of General, Indo-European, and Balkan Linguistics with the Faculty of Slavic Studies). This journal aims to encourage the study of Comparative Literature. The similarities and overlaps between less popular literatures and the well-researched canonical phenomena remain rather unexplored. Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum wants to give priority to such issues; to reconsider the clichéd notions of centres and peripheries, of one-way influences, temporary delays and topic deficiencies. It makes sense to seek the meaning of common affinities and trends, in other words – to look at what is positive, stimulating, and creative about the communication between literary and cultural phenomena. In fact, the Balkans are home to just a small share of the less researched literatures in the field of Comparative Literature. In Europe, we often know too little about our neighbours, unless they happen to be the French, German or British literatures.

Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum expresses itself in three languages: Bulgarian, French and English. It provides new opportunities for communication between scholars of Comparative Literature with the aim of a complete, conceptual and terminological understanding of new ideas within our field of research.

More...
IUS ROMANUM

IUS ROMANUM

Frequency: 2 issues / Country: Bulgaria

IUS ROMANUM is the first Bulgarian journal, dedicated to the study and research of Roman Law and Roman legal tradition in contemporary law. The journal's director and chief editor is Prof. Malina Novkirishka – Stoyanova, DSc, who teaches Roman Law at the Law Faculty of the Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski". The Scientific council consists of more than 50 members, including lecturers from different departments in the Sofia University and distinguished academics from the whole world, who have expressed their support for the initiative and have provided help in terms of submitting their own articles, presenting the journal on scientific forums, attracting new authors etc.

The online journal IUS ROMANUM is issued by the Law Faculty of the Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski". The authors, whose articles are published, are lecturers and researchers with interest in Roman Law and Roman legal tradition not only from the Law Faculty, but also from other Bulgarian and foreign universities. Since 2016 the journal also publishes works written by the members of the newly-founded Balkan Association of Roman Law and Roman Legal Tradition "Societas pro iure romano". The languages, in which the articles may be published, are Bulgarian, Italian, English, French and in exceptional cases Spanish.

The journal's purpose is to study and present the different aspects of the incorporation of Roman legal norms and principles into the contemporary legal systems, to outline the way in which modern-day legislation and legal culture was influenced by the Roman legal tradition. The journal also gives the Bulgarian audience the opportunity to familiarize itself with this subject. Every issue is dedicated to a specific topic and includes articles, which are relevant both to its Roman and to its contemporary legal aspects. Issues of the journal are published twice a year, once in June and once in December.

The journal is part of a project for the development of academic activity in the Sofia University which is financed by the national budget. Thus, most of the articles published are in Bulgarian. This, however, doesn't mean that only Bulgarian authors are given priority. Every author, who wishes to have their article published in the journal, can explicitly state whether he wants it published in the original language or translated in Bulgarian. Each article must be accompanied by a short resume in the respective original language and in English, as well as information about the author – their position and academic title, interests of research, shortlist of published works, post and e-mail addresses. Articles that are sent for translation in Bulgarian before publishing must also be accompanied by the author's explicit agreement for the translation, as well as information about the original publication of the article (if there is one) and the copyright of the respective publisher.

For complete information about the requirements for publishing, check the respective page on the journal's website.

Any articles sent for publishing undergo a check to see whether all requirements are met. They are afterwards sent in an anonymous form to be reviewed by two external peer reviewers, chosen by the manager, which are typically among the members of the Editorial Board. The reviewers must be experts in the scientific area, to which the article is primarily related, and they also must be representatives of universities that are different from the university, represented by the author of the article. The reviewing procedure and the Table for external peer review are the same for every author and are explained in detail on the respective page within this website. Articles are allowed to be published only in case of a positive result from the external peer review.

More...
Българска реч. Списание за езикознание и езикова култура

Българска реч. Списание за езикознание и езикова култура

Frequency: irregular and other / Country: Bulgaria

"Bulgarian Speech. Journal of Linguistics and Language Culture" is publication of the Department of Slavic Studies, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” in collaboration with Prof. Maxim Mladenov Foundation. The idea of issuing a popular science journal of language culture, which has been carefully thought over for a long time, is related to the work on developing and enhancing Bulgarian language culture and correct use. With its very title the journal carries on to a certain degree the patriotic work of the eminent Bulgarian linguists St. Mladenov, A. T.-Balan and B. Tsonev. These linguists together with St. Argirov started publishing Bulgarian Speech Journal in 1912, whose task was to “guide towards orderly and correct speech”. Unfortunately the journal was published for one year only. Without being a direct successor of the aforesaid journal, the first issue of Bulgarian Speech Journal came into being in 1995. The journal is governed by the idea that taking care of enhancing language culture cannot be a campaign issue. It needs to have a permanent nature and to become an obligation of educationalists, teachers and professors and any eminent figures in the area of culture and education. In line with the concept and tasks of the journal, the publication is divided into separate headings (or sections), which guide readers and authors through the subject matter of the published research. The journal highlights particularly research on the relation between language and speech for which the following headings/sections have been introduced: Language and Style, Language and Rules, Language Culture and Education, Bulgarian Vocabulary, etc. The idea to present the connection between language and the history and culture of its speakers (users) is reflected in the headings: Language and Society, Ethnic Culture and Speech, From the History of Bulgarian Language, Bulgarian Language and its Dialects. The publications in Prominent Names in Bulgarian Science and Culture focus on the tradition and historiography of Bulgarian linguistics, which provide information on anniversaries of Bulgarian and foreign scholars, who have contributed to the development of Bulgarian linguistics. Anniversary publications dedicated to honored Bulgarian linguists highlight their special contributions to Bulgarian linguistics. Bulgarian Speech Journal reports periodically on scientific events and publishes reviews and annotations of newly published linguistics works. The journal is published three times per year. Since 2010 an editorial board has been established, whose members are esteemed foreign specialists in Bulgarian linguistics. They have a strong interest in the journal and collaborate on its publication.

More...
Годишник на Софийския университет „Св. Климент Охридски“, Факултет по славянски филологии

Годишник на Софийския университет „Св. Климент Охридски“, Факултет по славянски филологии

Frequency: 1 issues / Country: Bulgaria

The first issue of the Annual of St. Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia appeared in 1904. In the period 1910 ‒ 1950 (nos.5 – 46), specialized series of the Faculty of History and Philology was published; in the period 1951-1965 there was Annual of the Philological Department which since 1966 split into Annual of the Department of Slavic Studies (Philologies) and Annual of the Department of Western Philologies. In the Annual of the Department (Faculty) of Slavic Studies, both established and young scholars and PhD students at that department report results of their research contributing to the study of Slavic languages and literatures. The publications cover various fields of philology, such as literary and language history, literary theories, general linguistics, Balkan linguistics, sociolinguistics, contact linguistics, intercultural relations, intertextuality, translation theory and practice, cultural anthropology, and others. The editorial board of the annual consists of 5 or 7 scholars working to the Department of Slavic Studies who review all the papers submitted for publication. Also, for every paper, the opinion of external reviewers was taken into account as well as the results of the discussion of the faculty members of the relevant chair at the department. Abstracts and keywords in English accompany all the papers published in the Annual.

More...
Годишник на Софийския университет „Св. Климент Охридски”, Факултет по журналистика и масова комуникация

Годишник на Софийския университет „Св. Климент Охридски”, Факултет по журналистика и масова комуникация

Frequency: 1 issues / Country: Bulgaria

THE ANNUAL OF SOFIA UNIVERSITY „ST. KLIMENT OHRIDSKI”. FACULTY OF JOURNALISM AND MASS COMMUNICATION publishes scientific papers from all spheres of mass communication, resulting from the research work of lecturers and PhD students in Journalism, Public Relations and Book publishing.

More...
Годишник на Стопанския факултет на СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“

Годишник на Стопанския факултет на СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“

Frequency: 1 issues / Country: Bulgaria

More...
Литературата

Литературата

Frequency: 2 issues / Country: Bulgaria

The Literaturata (Literature) journal was set up in the 1990s by the so-called Vazov Society within the Department of Slavic Studies of Sofia University. Its founders were the corresponding member of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Milena Tsaneva and Professor Simeon Yanev. Back then nearly 20 issues were released, their contents organized primarily around some of the major schools of literary theory. The translations took precedence, but Bulgarian texts illustrating the approach of the school in question were also carried out. After a hiatus of several years the journal resumed its run in 2007. It had by then become the official publication of the Department of Slavic Studies of Sofia University, but kept the tradition of having each issue organized around a more specific topic, such as globalization, writing and the Internet, ideologies, the policies of otherness, reading, the media, the teaching of literature in schools, etc. The proportion of translated texts has been preserved in the new editions, but the number of languages from which they are being made has been increased. Thus, readers are made familiar with works not only from English, French and German, but also from Italian, Spanish, Greek and Portuguese. The number of Bulgarian entries on the topic of each issue has also been expanded. Two new sections have been introduced of late: the “Debuts” section carrying texts by undergraduate and graduate students, and the “Reviews” section featuring the latest books in humanitarian studies. The journal is pronouncedly interdisciplinary in nature and solicits contributions from scholars from all Bulgarian universities and the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. The Literaturata journal is being published by the Department of Slavic Studies of Sofia University and is being printed at the University’s own Publishing House. Its editor-in-chief is Professor Valery Stefanov, D. Philology, and the editorial board includes also Professor Amelia Licheva, PhD, Associate Professor Ivan Ivanov, PhD, Associate Professor Petya Osenova, PhD, and Senior Assistant Professor Noemi Stoichkova, PhD. The Faculty of Slavic Studies was established in 1888, with the foundation of the Higher Pedagogical Courses and the introduction of philological courses. The next year Slavic Philology was studied as a Major at the newly founded Faculty of History and Philology. Until 1946 the main degree programmes were in Bulgarian and Russian Philology. The first degree course in Slavic Studies was introduced in 1953. History and Slavic Studies became separate faculties in 1950. Since 1965 there have been two separate philological faculties at Sofia University – the Faculty of Slavic Studies and the Faculty of Classical and Modern Philology. In 1997 a new curriculum was introduced at the Faculty of Slavic Studies, to meet the requirements for acquiring Bachelor's and Master's of Art degrees. Slavic Philology and Balkan Studies offers five-year course of tuition, which leads to a Master's of Art degree . In 2003 a new syllabus complying with ESTF was introduced and actualized for all subjects at the faculty. Over 120 year-long history of the Faculty of Slavic Studies generations of students and scholars have kept, handed down and created the knowledge about Bulgarian people, language, literature and culture.

More...
Литературата: Образи и контексти. Юбилеен сборник, посветен на 60-годишнината на професор Цветан Ракьовски
0.00 €

Литературата: Образи и контексти. Юбилеен сборник, посветен на 60-годишнината на професор Цветан Ракьовски

Author(s): / Language(s): Bulgarian

The collective work contains 37 analytical texts in the field of Bulgarian and European works of literature and cultures. The main ideologies, aesthetical trends and literary languages are observed in the articles.

More...
МЕЖДУНАРОДНИЯТ ТРАНСФЕР НА АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ МОДЕЛИ И ИНСТРУМЕНТИ: ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ, ОГРАНИЧЕНИЯ И РИСКОВЕ. Доклади от Първа международна конференция по публична администрация София, СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“, април 2017 г.
20.00 €

МЕЖДУНАРОДНИЯТ ТРАНСФЕР НА АДМИНИСТРАТИВНИ МОДЕЛИ И ИНСТРУМЕНТИ: ВЪЗМОЖНОСТИ, ОГРАНИЧЕНИЯ И РИСКОВЕ. Доклади от Първа международна конференция по публична администрация София, СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“, април 2017 г.

Author(s): Aleksandar Marinov,Georgi Peev,Mariana Dimitrova,Milena Stefanova,Snežana Ilieva,Yana Chakarova,Todor Tanev,Fabrice Larat,Andrei Velchev,Atanas Slavov,Elena Kalfova,Kliment Naydenov,Metodi Ivanov,Vladyslav Akulov-Muratov,Boril Mechkov,Petia Branzova,Simeon Petrov,Tatiana Tomova,Jaroslav Dvorak,Gabrielė Burbulytė – Tsiskarishvili,Edita Stumbraitė-Vilkišienė,Liudmila Guzikova,Lyubimka Andreeva,Georgi Vuldjev,Georgy Ganev,Georgy Sarakostov,Nikolai Valkanov,Ognian Boyukliev,Stoyan Panchev,Krassen Stanchev,Maria Kotseva-Tikova,Milkana Mochurova,Venko Petkov,Galina Stoyanova,Georgi Temelkov,Detelin Dimitrov,Iskra Mileva,Liliya Elenkova,Mariela Yordanova,Nikoleta Efremova,Petya Krasteva,Todor Izhbehov / Language(s): English,Bulgarian

What thoughts the following theme does evoke – “International transfer of administrative models and instruments: opportunities, constraints and risks?” It became an object of “love at first sight” for me immediately after it was proposed as a unifying “crown” of the international scientific conference on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of Sofia University’s Department of Public Administration. What broader content could be set which nevertheless presupposes most specific definitions? What more dynamic context might exist which in fact supports the opposite of dynamics – the sustainability of administrative models resistant to pressures for change? What other topic bundles better tradition and reform of administrative systems? First and foremost, it is the host of the conference – the jubilee Department of Public Administration at Sofia University – that is a living example of the international transfer of theories and trends in the field of administrative science. This small scientific community had to meet all challenges of that transfer during its formative years. On the one hand it was pressed to accept the changing political trends in Western societies by theorizing the administrative models backed by them as a manifestation of progressiveness. On the other hand, the need to create an explanation and prescription for his own Bulgarian administrative practice as a manifestation of elementary adequacy it has always existed. The conclusion from the distance of the past 20 years is that these two lines were combined continuously and successfully. If the themes of international forums on public administration in the 90s of the 20th century are considered it will become clear that the separation of administration from politics was the prevailing problem. This sturdy preference was supported by the use of the authority of classic authors such as Max Weber or Woodrow Wilson. It seemed that the emancipation of administrative science was thus achieved once forever. It happened so that the Department of Public Administration got separated structurally and thematically from other disciplines in Sofia University exactly during the same moment. Similar matching of global trends with local developments within the field of administrative science in few other universities paralleled Sofia University’s Department of PA emancipation from Political Science. As a result, Bulgarian versions of the ideal of what is “civil service” started being sought for with skeptical optimism. Should the administration in the democratic future of the country, however, follow imported Victorian models of “civil service”, or, on the contrary, more creative and proactive participation in decision making should be hammered out? The answer to this dilemma followed quite soon. The tempestuous liberal development in the West considered an objective by the Bulgarian leaders changed the emphasis in administrative science. It was not enough to Theorizing the functional distinction between politics and administration per se became insufficient. It was a matter of good scientific tone to find ways and reasons to minimize government intervention in sector management and place the latter as a new unprecedented major task of public administration. The development of a Bulgarian version of apolitical governance through public policies designed and managed by special networks formed ad hoc by citizens and economic operators became the main task of administrative science in the first years of the 21st century. It was in this way that the original thematic field of administration expanded in Bulgaria by inclusion of research on issues of public policy. The emerging soon after concept of “Good Governance” in the Western world undermined confidence in the traditional rational “Management by Objectives”. The period of initial harmonization of Bulgaria with the European directives in the first years after the country as an EU member somehow naturally draw the attention of our researchers to lists of desirable qualities called “good governance” created by international banks and global organizations. Quite naturally, observing the transitive setting that determined the entry of the good governance principles in the Bulgarian administrative practice made our researchers for the first time be attentive to the problems that the direct import of standard projects for good governance in the country could create. For example, the National Ombudsman institution led by Mr. Ginyo Ganev developed a concise Bulgarian conceptual framework for good governance with the help of the Department of PA at Sofia. It started being applied actively with an increasing success to diverse cases in the focus of attention of this institution. Developments in this regard expanded as much as the creation of an entirely Bulgarian concept of a new human “right of good governance”. The Department of PA consulted and developed strategic projects of the Council of Ministers in the bosom of “good governance” and public policy. The original purely theoretical interest in global paradigms in the field of economic management such as “quality management” and “total quality management” gradually evolved into an interest for their practical application in the Bulgarian administrative practice. As it is in countries with developed democracy over the last decade, it is looked for project appraisals, impact assessment of policies, etc. in context of quality management in Bulgaria as well. It is in this way that certain doubts emerged for the first time. First, how possible is it to successfully transfer, adapt and develop economic theories in the socio-political field without losing their basic sense? Second, if the quality management in the public sphere is examined, how is the object to be tested to be defined? What does quality of public governance mean? What are the legitimate criteria for it to be funded, adopted, and maintained? Until this moment versions of Western administrative mindset penetrating via European directives and other vehicles of influence were intensively developed. However, Bulgaria’s own development from this moment on started imposing a brand new round of research. The past decade uncorked the bottle with the spirit of administrative reforms. A whole arsenal of new problems: what is reform, what is change, what is direction, what is progress and so on was added to the issues already accumulated by the transfer of ideas and best practices considered as “best”. A genuine Bulgarian view on issues of local administrative reforms started getting formed by separate members of Sofia University’s scientific community more and more boldly. What has never been done so far in sufficient size, however, is the development of the old theme of sustainable development from a national perspective. It was left in the hands of political bureaucracy and I hope that it is not abandoned there by our researchers. Sustainable development does not only look like but is generally an issue of key importance. It amalgamates the political, administrative, economic and social problems. The pressure for direct application of practices arising from the so-called “Global sustainable development goals” became tumultuous form of formal accountability. The parameters of the polar sets resistance-development, global-local, political-administrative, etc. remain unclear. Thus the meanders of the development of Bulgarian administrative science that followed up to this moment gradually the sequence of changes in the same area in the world for its own reasons found at last the main problem hidden all the time. This problem is: what are the opportunities, limitations and risks of international transfers of administrative models and instruments? However, this is the theme of the conference. In other words, the wall separating political and administrative management is already raised – administrative decisions today are taken in agreement with the so called social partners, NGOs, networks, etc. Various formulas of good governance, in particular lawfulness, transparency, etc., are applied since long ago be it in one degree or another. Management in the public sphere is fragmented by sector policies and hence by separate projects driven by networking teams. The quality of management activities is measured although only by the proportion between the invested funds and tasks performed such as numbers of training pf administrators, etc. Why is the widespread opinion then that the administration is not working well despite all the good intentions with which people work behind the counters of state and local institutions? I think the key answer is modernization, not modernity. Modernization is a continuous process of an existing human community with a will of life. In contrast, modernity is a condition that those inferior according to someone's perspective should or should not, may or may not adopt. Modernization is moving forward in the name of preserving the general essence intact. Conversely, the movement toward modernity is changing the nature of those perceived as non-modern whereby however no one guarantees either the meaning or the consequences, or even the opportunity that this could happen. What are the ultimate objectives of administrative science keeping modernization in mind if this really is the most general question? Modernization implies preserving the identity of the human community under changing circumstances. Why identity must be maintained is another question that is absurd per se, least according Kant’s Categorical imperative. Without “subjectivity”, at least according to Hegel’s philosophy (why not according to classical economic and legal theory), it no action is possible at all, including actions for “improving the situation.” Values separate at least as much as they unite. Could Eastern European societies follow some winning value model at the beginning of the political changes? Was it only their totalitarian political past that made them different from foreign models? The Anglo-Saxon model of governance is based on the culture of urban individualism. The culture of successful Asian “dragons” is based on collectivist Confucian rationalism. Seen at this background, the Western model based on Roman law is offering rational norms. Although somewhat differing one from the other, Eastern European societies, including Bulgarian, proved to be different from all that. In an effort to get modernized once again they had to make hard choices for their future. The triple eclecticism between Eastern European value system, the successful Asian “developmental dictatorship” and the victorious superindividualistic urban West was even more impossible. However, it turns out that the Western and Eastern universe have defended themselves for centuries by modernization cast in strictly defined areas and volumes sufficient only to maintain their own development model. It seems that the task of the Bulgarian administration and administrative science after 20 years of establishment is no more and no less the same. So, the international scientific conference on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the foundation of the Sofia University’s Public Administration Department turns out to be something like a membrane separating past from future development. The transition from the former to the latter is a clarification of how possible and how necessary the international transfer of administrative models and instruments is.

More...
ПРИНОСИ КЪМ ТЕОРИЯТА И ПРАКТИКАТА НА ПУБЛИЧНАТА АДМИНИСТРАЦИЯ. Двадесет години специалност „Публична администрация“ в Софийския университет „Св. Климент Охридски
10.00 €

ПРИНОСИ КЪМ ТЕОРИЯТА И ПРАКТИКАТА НА ПУБЛИЧНАТА АДМИНИСТРАЦИЯ. Двадесет години специалност „Публична администрация“ в Софийския университет „Св. Климент Охридски

Author(s): Tatiana Tomova,Todor Tanev,Aleksandar Marinov,Albena Taneva,Atanas Slavov,Milena Stefanova,Elena Kalfova,Yordan Botev,Simeon Petrov,Maria Kotseva-Tikova,Denitsa Hinkova,Lyubimka Andreeva,Aleko Djildjov / Language(s): Bulgarian

All the studies presented in the annual collection have a common basis. These are the values of modern good governance. It seems as if individual authors have stated that good public administration is primarily subordinated to public values and not just to regulations. Therefore, it sees the administration as a civil service in the spirit of responsible bureaucracy and as a co-author in the formation of public policies. Leading economic, sociological, socio-psychological, political and philosophical concepts find co-existence in published research.

More...
ПУБЛИЧНИ ПОЛИТИКИ.bg

ПУБЛИЧНИ ПОЛИТИКИ.bg

Frequency: 4 issues / Country: Bulgaria

The electronic journal „Public Policy.bg” provides scientific support to good governance. It is aimed both at practitioners and scientists in the field of public sector management. Both groups can publish in it, as well as vice versa – to find the empirical or theoretical information provided by the "beyond". The journal is scientific. The articles are reviewed and selected for publishing by Editorial Board using the peer review method, ie. by assessing the correspondence of the texts with scientific criteria (scientific problem, thesis, scientific apparatus, method, evidence, achievement of a scientific fact). The Editorial Board is composed of scientists from different management courses and experienced representatives of management practice from the central and local government.The journal „Public Policy.bg” strengthens and promotes modern management thinking in the categories of public policies, good governance and social networks. The journal presents the advantages of this approach to the archaic linear management, which has embraced the public administration in captivity of passive performance. The journal draws attention to the opportunities for creative, strategic and political responsibilities of the administration. Issues of great importance are the new role of public administration in the 21st century, the principles of good governance in the age of globalization, the network approach in governance, strategic thinking, the problems of the administrative elite, administrative capacity and statehood. The research on the effectiveness and efficiency of the public administration is of central importance. Special attention is given to a multidisciplinary approach to the major problems of public governance. Topics of interest include management in healthcare, education, environmental protection, labor market, immigration, administrative reform, security, social activities, relations between the central and local levels. The techniques and methods for assessing policy implementation are also of interest as well as the financing and budgeting of administrative activity. Although the journal focuses mainly on public policies in Bulgaria, „Public Policy.bg” is paying special attention to good governance practices from Europe and the world.

More...
Социална работа

Социална работа

Frequency: 2 issues / Country: Bulgaria

"Social Work" is the first Bulgarian applied science journal for social work and social sciences. The journal provides original publications - research, analytical articles, science comments and reviews, research reports, science announcements, as well as reviews of books and educational literature in the field of social work.

More...
Съвременно право

Съвременно право

Frequency: 4 issues / Country: Bulgaria

Contemporary Law Journal was established in 1991. It is published by the Faculty of Law of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, which is the oldest, the largest and constantly being awarded the highest accreditation ratings Law faculty in Bulgaria. It is printed and distributed by Sibi Publishing House -- the only Bulgarian publishing house specialised in legal literature.

The journal’s publications include academic, scientific-practical and other research papers by Bulgarian and foreign authors. It reflects achievements in all areas of law and its application – theory and history of the state and the legal systems, administrative law and administrative procedure, property law, civil procedure law, tax law, commercial law, constitutional law, criminal law, criminal procedure law, criminalistics, EU law, financial law, family law and law of succession, intellectual property law, international private law, international public law, labour law, law of obligations, Roman law, social security law; as well as reviews, information on academic forums, case law.

The authors involve both respected academics and young researchers at the beginning of their careers. The published research papers cover Bulgarian law and the law of other states, of international organisations, the EU law. Its main headings are ‘Articles’, ‘Discussions’, ‘Foreign Experience’, ‘Improvement of Legislation’, ‘Young Contributors’ and others.

Papers are published in Bulgarian with keywords and abstracts in English. Each issue provides basic information about the authors and their contact details.

The journal has four issues per year.

The Editorial Board members are prominent academics, promising younger specialists, legal practitioners. The international Editorial Board includes established academics from Germany, Portugal, Spain, the Republic of Northern Macedonia and Russia.

More...
Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание

Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание

Frequency: 4 issues / Country: Bulgaria

One of the first European journals to be entirely devoted to contrastive linguistics, Съпоставително езикознание/ Сопоставительное языкознание/ Contrastive Linguistics has contributed for more than three decades to a growing body of research in the field. The journal first appeared as Bulletin for the Contrastive Study of Bulgarian and Other Languages in 1976 under the editorship of Professor Svetomir Ivancev. Professor Zhivko Bojadziev continued the work after Professor Ivancev’s death. Currently, Professor Petya Assenova is the Editor-in-Chief of the journal. The journal is published four times per year and each issue is approximately 180 pages. The journal accepts manuscripts in Bulgarian, Russian, German, French, Spanish and English. The journal publishes articles, book reviews and notes in the fields of contrastive linguistics, general linguistics, the theory and practice of translation, and history of linguistics (portraits of outstanding Bulgarian and foreign linguists, history of Bulgarian linguistics and history of Bulgarian studies abroad), reviews of books on any linguistic topics and issues, thematic and personal bibliographies. Over the past thirty years Contrastive Linguistics has featured works by outstanding scholars from Bulgaria and abroad and continues to be a reputable peer-reviewed venue for research in the field. It is in Contrastive Linguistics that many young Ph.D. students, budding lecturers and researchers see their first scholarly articles published. Editorial board of the journal: Janko Bačvarov, Aleksandra Bagasheva (managing editor), Stefana Dimitrova (deputy editor-in-chief), Enčo Gerganov, Julija Kirilova, Ivan Kančev, Margarita Mladenova, Boris Paraškevov, Silvia Petkova, Christo Stamenov, Dina Staniševa, Yovka Tiševa, Dimitar Veselinov, Radost Železarova (managing editor). Editorial advisory board: Aleksandr Bondarko (St. Petersburg), Catherine Chvany (Cambridge, Mass.), Irina Červenkova (Sofia), Jack Feuillet (Paris), Jacek Fisiak (Poznań), Zlatka Guenčeva (Paris), Olga Mladenova (Calgary), Predrag Piper (Belgrad), Alexander Veiga Rodriguez (Santiago de Compostela), Ernest Scatton (Albany, New York), Ludmila Uhliřovă (Prague), Hilmar Walter (Leipzig).

More...
Филологически форум

Филологически форум

Frequency: 2 issues / Country: Bulgaria

The Philological Forum is an interdisciplinary scholarly journal centring on the sphere of the humanities and established to serve as a platform for young scholars. Its issues are topical and are curated by a scholar specialising in the relevant area of philology and, broadly, the humanities. Articles in the journal concern issues pertaining to literary history and theory, the history of language and linguistic theory, cultural anthropology, folklore studies and ethnology, research on subjects relating to Antiquity and the Middle Ages, the media, theatre and cinema, language and literature education and the theory and practice of translation. Issues pertaining to Bulgarian studies abroad are given special consideration. The journal publishes scholarly articles, reviews, travelogues, fiction and interviews by young and establishes authors alike. The journal’s working languages include all Slavic languages, English and French. Texts in German, Spanish, Italian and Romanian are allowed.

The intended audience of the texts includes scholars, university lecturers, teachers in the humanities, specifically in the field of philology, BA, MA and PhD students, post-doc researchers and readers interested in philology.

More...
Result 1-16 of 16

About

CEEOL is a leading provider of academic e-journals and e-books in the Humanities and Social Sciences from and about Central and Eastern Europe. In the rapidly changing digital sphere CEEOL is a reliable source of adjusting expertise trusted by scholars, publishers and librarians. Currently, over 1000 publishers entrust CEEOL with their high-quality journals and e-books. CEEOL provides scholars, researchers and students with access to a wide range of academic content in a constantly growing, dynamic repository. Currently, CEEOL covers more than 2000 journals and 690.000 articles, over 4500 ebooks and 6000 grey literature document. CEEOL offers various services to subscribing institutions and their patrons to make access to its content as easy as possible. Furthermore, CEEOL allows publishers to reach new audiences and promote the scientific achievements of the Eastern European scientific community to a broader readership. Un-affiliated scholars have the possibility to access the repository by creating their personal user account

Contact Us

Central and Eastern European Online Library GmbH
Basaltstrasse 9
60487 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main HRB 53679
VAT number: DE300273105
Phone: +49 (0)69-20026820
Fax: +49 (0)69-20026819
Email: info@ceeol.com

Connect with CEEOL

  • Join our Facebook page
  • Follow us on Twitter
CEEOL Logo Footer
2022 © CEEOL. ALL Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of use
ICB - InterConsult Bulgaria ver.1.7.2509

Login CEEOL

{{forgottenPasswordMessage.Message}}

Enter your Username (Email) below.

Shibbolet Login

Shibboleth authentication is only available to registered institutions.