O procesach tłumaczenia tekstu literackiego  – część druga . Na przykładzie „Emeryta”  
Brunona Schulza  [1892–1942] (opis ćwiczenia) Cover Image

O procesach tłumaczenia tekstu literackiego – część druga. Na przykładzie „Emeryta” Brunona Schulza [1892–1942] (opis ćwiczenia)
O procesach tłumaczenia tekstu literackiego – część druga . Na przykładzie „Emeryta” Brunona Schulza [1892–1942] (opis ćwiczenia)

Author(s): Piotr P. Chruszczewski
Subject(s): Language and Literature Studies, Translation Studies
Published by: Komisja Nauk Filologicznych Oddziału Polskiej Akademii Nauk we Wrocławiu
Keywords: translation as product vs. translation as a process; literary translation; Bruno Schulz

Summary/Abstract: The very text is directly related to the text entitled “On the Process of Translation of a Literary Text. A Case Study of “Edzio” by Bruno Schulz (an overview of an exercise)” published a year ago (see Chruszczewski 2019). “The vast majority of texts regarding a number of issues connected with the notion of translation describe the translated text as a product – that is another text rendered into another culture, not even mentioning another language. The idea of this exercise was based upon an attempt of having a look at how exactly the process of translation of a literary text would proceed. This short presentation is just a small fragment of a much larger work devoted to the process of translation” (Chruszczewski 2019: 57–58). It is a presentation of a translation exercise undertaken by ten students coming from two different seminar groups. Each of the students have translated from Polish into English a text of a comparable length. All the students are bilingual, and fluent in English. None of them is a native speaker of English. After the translation exercise was completed the texts were assembled and integrated into a coherent literary narration in the target language. All students were asked to try to write down their impressions while they were translating the text, including what was the rationale behind their decisions. As one can notice, it was relatively easy for the students to provide interesting translations, but the majority of them found it exceptionally difficult to describe their choices as translators. The above can be a hint for future theorists of translation studies to start large scale interdisciplinary projects based on the interesting fact that translation processes (in plural!) can work differently within the minds of translators even if they are almost at the same age and they come from quite similar cultural and linguistic backgrounds.

  • Issue Year: 2020
  • Issue No: 10
  • Page Range: 65-90
  • Page Count: 26
  • Language: Polish