Kant or Cant(or) Cover Image
  • Price 2.00 €

Кант или Kант(ор)
Kant or Cant(or)

Author(s): Valentin Asparuhov
Subject(s): Philosophy, Social Sciences, Education, Psychology, History of Philosophy, Philosophical Traditions, Epistemology, Logic, Special Branches of Philosophy, Philosophy of Mind, Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Language, Phenomenology, Hermeneutics
Published by: Национално издателство за образование и наука „Аз-буки“
Keywords: philosophical logic; synthesis; denotation; a synthetic unity apperceived

Summary/Abstract: The article aims to overcome the traditional standards in connection with the interpretation of Russell’s philosophical logic. The requirement which is needed for that aim to be done is the re-evaluation of a series of features in the British philosopher’s mode of thinking. The text is organized as it follows. 1) A mixture of some autobiographical storylines, which suggest the negative attitude of Russell to the tradition of transcendentalism. 2) Analysis of some selected sections from Russell’s unpublished manuscript from 1903/1904, which is rarely mentioned, too. In the context of the same manuscript, some indicators are visible, and they show that in his mental experiments transcendental counterparts of important logical puzzles exist. 3) It is maintained that the problems of philosophical logic and non-classical transcendentalism could be studied together relying on Critique of Pure Reason.

  • Issue Year: 28/2019
  • Issue No: 3
  • Page Range: 304-316
  • Page Count: 13
  • Language: Bulgarian