Admissibility of the appeal for annulment against final judgments that failed to resolve the case merits Cover Image
  • Price 5.88 €

Admisibilitatea contestației în anulare formulate împotriva hotărârilor judecătorești definitive prin care nu s-a soluționat fondul cauzei
Admissibility of the appeal for annulment against final judgments that failed to resolve the case merits

Author(s): Florin Daniel Cășuneanu
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Uniunea Juriștilor din România
Keywords: appeal for annulment; final judgment; the High Court of Cassation and Justice; European arrest warrant; preventive measures.

Summary/Abstract: Appeal for annulment – extraordinary remedy at law under the current Criminal Procedure Code and the new Code of Criminal Procedure – may be exercised against final judgments pronounced by the last instance of judicial control provided there are certain cases expressly mentioned and that it is filed in a given period. Final judgments may also concern other aspects adjacent to criminal proceedings, for example, taking, retention or reversal of preventive measures or enforcement of a European arrest warrant. In such cases, taking into account that the law of criminal procedure does not provide other terms of admissibility, under the dictum “Ubi lex non distinguit, nec nos distinguere debemus”, the author considers that the appeal for annulment extraordinary remedy at law may be exercised in such cases as well; the case law solution stating that the appeal for annulment is admissible only against final judgments resolving the case merits is therefore illegal.

  • Issue Year: 2012
  • Issue No: 11
  • Page Range: 167-172
  • Page Count: 6
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode