Considerations on the concept of interrupting the course of justice in criminal proceedings Cover Image
  • Price 5.88 €

Considerații în legătură cu noțiunea de întrerupere a cursului justiției în procesul penal
Considerations on the concept of interrupting the course of justice in criminal proceedings

Author(s): Florin Daniel Cășuneanu
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Published by: Uniunea Juriștilor din România
Keywords: High Court of Cassation and Justice; the interruption of the course of justice; jurisdiction; conflict of jurisdiction.

Summary/Abstract: The institution of course of justice interruption was first introduced in the criminal procedure of Romania in the Charles II Code of Criminal Procedure (1936), being kept in the current Code of Criminal Procedure [Art. 29 point 5 item b)] and also in the new Code of Criminal Procedure adopted by Law No. 135/2010 [Art. 40 paragraph (4)]. The author shows that the Romanian legislator failed to clarify this phrase, leaving the identification of the cases of interrupting the course of justice to the legal literature, but especially to the case law. The case law of the High Court of Cassation and Justice may conclude that the “interrupting the course of justice” phrase requires the occurrence of a criminal case pending before a court of law which has no possibility of achieving the ultimate goal of the trial due to inapplicability of any of the procedural provisions relating to jurisdiction, so that the competent court to order a legal solution cannot be determined.

  • Issue Year: 2012
  • Issue No: 09
  • Page Range: 202-208
  • Page Count: 7
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode