The Number of Moons Is Not a Number
The Number of Moons Is Not a Number
Towards a Comprehensive Linguistic Approach to Frege’s Commitment Puzzle
Author(s): Borys JastrzębskiSubject(s): Philosophy, Analytic Philosophy, Philosophy of Language
Published by: Uniwersytet Warszawski - Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii, Instytut Filozofii
Keywords: ontological commitments; focus constructions; congruency tests; pragmatics; syntax; number words
Summary/Abstract: There is a puzzle, noticed by Frege, about inferences from sentences like (F1) “Jupiter has four moons” to sentences like (F2) “The number of moons of Jupiter is four”. They seem to be truth-conditionally equivalent but, apparently, they say something about completely different things. (F1) seems to be about moons, while(F2) about numbers. This phenomenon raises several puzzles about semantics, syntax, and is one of main tools of easy ontology. Recently, new linguistic and pragmatic solutions were proposed. Linguistic solutions of Thomas Hofweber and Katharina Felka are refreshed versions of the traditional paraphrastic approach that involve consideration of conversational contexts as well as syntactical structure of copular sentences. The pragmatic solution resorts to bracketing or indifference to certain possible alternatives and contexts of a sentence. I discuss their strong and weak points and propose to include in further research John Biro’s account of the expression “the number of planets”, which solves the problems of the new linguistic approaches.
Journal: Filozofia Nauki
- Issue Year: 24/2016
- Issue No: 2 (94)
- Page Range: 31-49
- Page Count: 19
- Language: English