THE TRANSFORMATION OF METAPHYSICS IN LATE ANTIQUITY Cover Image

ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ МЕТАФИЗИКИ В ЭПОХУ ПОЗДНЕЙ АНТИЧНОСТИ
THE TRANSFORMATION OF METAPHYSICS IN LATE ANTIQUITY

Author(s): Dominic J. O’Meara
Subject(s): Philosophy
Published by: Новосибирский государственный университет
Keywords: Metaphysics; Alexander of Aphrodisias; Syrianus; Proclus; Damascius

Summary/Abstract: The paper discusses the development of metaphysics understood as a philosophical discipline or science. I would like to propose that the last period of Greek philosophy, that going from about the 3rd to the 6th centuries A.D., made new and interesting contributions to metaphysics as a philosophical discipline, indeed made metaphysics into a metaphysical science, while also bringing out the limits of such a science. The paper has four parts. In part I, I introduce the way in which the great Aristotelian commentator of the early 3rd cen-tury, Alexander of Aphrodisias, in interpreting Aristotle's metaphysical treatise, sought to find in it a metaphysical science. In part II of the paper, I attempt to show how the Neopla-tonist philosopher of the early 5th century Syrianus, not only adopted Alexander's reading of Aristotle, but was also inspired by it in finding this same metaphysical science already in Plato. In part III of the paper, I will show how all of this resulted in a masterpiece of meta-physics, the Elements of Theology written by Syrianus' pupil Proclus. Finally, in part IV, I would like to refer to what is perhaps the last great metaphysical work of Greek philosophy, the Treatise on First Principles written by Damascius, a work in which the limits of meta-physical science are explored with extraordinary subtlety and insistence. In adapting Alexan-der's formalization of Aristotelian metaphysical science to Platonism, Syrianus knew that such a science was a means towards, not the equivalent of, knowledge of the transcendent. Proclus knew it too, even if his Elements of Theology, in presenting metaphysical science with such systematic beauty, could give the impression of being a definitive statement. And, lest we have any illusions about the adequacy of our metaphysical science, Damascius could cure us of these, opening our minds to what lay behind, or above, our own metaphysical efforts.

  • Issue Year: III/2009
  • Issue No: 2
  • Page Range: 416-432
  • Page Count: 16
  • Language: Russian