CAN SOMEONE BE UNWORTHY TO EXERCISE THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE? QUESTIONS OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR PERSONS SENTENCED TO IMPRISONMENT, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HUNGARIAN PRACTICE
CAN SOMEONE BE UNWORTHY TO EXERCISE THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE? QUESTIONS OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR PERSONS SENTENCED TO IMPRISONMENT, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HUNGARIAN PRACTICE
Author(s): Gábor KuruncziSubject(s): Constitutional Law, Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Comparative Law
Published by: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika
Keywords: exclusion from the right to vote; commission of a criminal offence; custodial sentence; disqualification from public affairs; practice of the European Court of Human Rights; Hungarian practice;
Summary/Abstract: Over time, the generality of the right to vote has become an accepted principle, but it is still possible to disenfranchise a person if they have committed a crime. In international practice, this ground for disenfranchisement is considered accepted, but the ECtHR has pointed out that individualization and discretion are essential. National practice in this respect is quite varied: in some countries, offenders are automatically excluded, but in other countries, this should not happen in any case, and in the third category the disenfranchisement is only possible on a case-by-case basis. According to the current Hungarian legislation, the exclusion is only possible if the offender is sentenced to a custodial sentence and is also disqualified from public affairs. The Hungarian practice is in line with the ECtHR practice, however, on the basis of statistical, disenfranchisement for criminal offences remains quasi-automatic. Therefore, the study also outlines possible solutions that could make the Hungarian legislation more forward-looking.
Journal: Comparative Law Review
- Issue Year: 30/2024
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 85-111
- Page Count: 27
- Language: English
