19. Interpretarea art. 86 alin. (2) teza a V-a din O.U.G. nr. 195/2002 [actualul art. 335 alin. (2) teza a V-a NCP] – conducerea unui autovehicul de către o persoană care nu are dreptul de a conduce în România
19. The interpretation of art. 86 al. (2) 5th thesis of O.U.G. no. 195/2002 [art. 335 al. (2) 5th thesis of the new penal Code], a person that drives an auto vehicle by who does albeit not having the right to drive auto vehicules in Romania

Summary/Abstract: The defendant F.I.D. was acquitted for committing the crime of driving an auto vehicule while not having the right to drive auto vehicules in Romania. The Court stated that, in reality, this thesis targets the person that actually has the right to drive auto vehicules, but not in Romania. Also, the Court disavowed the existence of the hypothesis of driving while having his permit annulled, since the disposition of annulment was not communicated to the defendant.

• Details
• Contents