THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WRITTEN AND MATERIAL EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS Cover Image

DEOSEBIREA DINTRE ÎNSCRISURI ȘI PROBELE MATERIALE ÎN PROCESUL CIVIL
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WRITTEN AND MATERIAL EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

Author(s): Alexandru Prisac, Corneliu Soltan, Mariana-Alina Zisu
Subject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law, Administrative Law
Published by: Universitatea de Studii Europene din Moldova
Keywords: document; material evidence; court; evidence management; attributes;

Summary/Abstract: This article analyzes the differences between documents and material evidence in civil proceedings in the Republic of Moldova. The notion of document and material evidence in the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Moldova was investigated. In order to reflect these differences, the particularities of documents and material evidence were highlighted separately. The complex aspects of distinguishing documents and material evidence in civil proceedings are treated, because they can often be confused. The differences regarding their nature, management, risks and assessment in court were mostly highlighted. Also, the aspects regarding documents resulting from operations with electronic documents, which may also contain material evidence, were analyzed. This aspect is also treated from the aspect of their assessment by the court in the court decision. Equal attention was paid to both means of evidence, because both evidence are essential in the civil process and must comply with the conditions of legality, relevance and admissibility in order to be used in the resolution of the civil case by the court.

  • Issue Year: 2025
  • Issue No: 02
  • Page Range: 44-47
  • Page Count: 4
  • Language: Romanian
Toggle Accessibility Mode