O PERSPECTIVĂ ASUPRA MODULUI DE RAPORTARE A MINISTERULUI ENERGIEI LA AVIZELE PRIMITE ÎN PROCEDURA DE AVIZARE A O.U.G. NR. 32/2024 PENTRU MODIFICAREA ŞI COMPLETAREA O.U.G. NR. 27/2022
A PERSPECTIVE ON THE REPORTING OF THE MINISTRY OF ENERGY ON THE OPINIONS RECEIVED IN THE PROCEDURE FOR THE APPROVAL OF GEO NO. 32/2024 FOR THE AMENDMENT AND COMPLETION OF GEO NO. 27/2022

Summary/Abstract: The legal regime governing government ordinances in Romania is shaped by Articles 108 and 115 of the Constitution, with the latter addressing the legislative delegation process. The growing reliance on delegated legislation has raised concerns about its potential to disrupt the balance of legislative authority, as reflected in the European Commission for Democracy through Law's (Venice Commission) opinion from December 2012, which highlighted the frequent use of emergency ordinances as problematic. Legislative procedure, particularly the consultation and incorporation of expert opinions from relevant authorities, plays a crucial role in ensuring that such ordinances conform to constitutional standards, enhance transparency, and avoid legal ambiguities. The legislative drafting process, as mandated by Article 9 of Law 24/2000, emphasizes the importance of obtaining these advisory opinions during the early stages of legal development. A pertinent case is the recent Ordinance No. 32/2024, which amends the existing framework for energy regulation. This ordinance involved the consultation of several key authorities, including the Competition Council, the National Energy Regulatory Authority (ANRE), and various ministries. While most of the expert recommendations were integrated into the final text, some critical legal observations, particularly from the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Justice, concerning the ordinance’s constitutionality and legality, were not fully addressed. This omission raises important questions about the thoroughness of the legislative review process and underscores the need for greater attention to the substance of legal and constitutional concerns to prevent future challenges.

• Details
• Contents