Responsible Warfare. US-Iran Case
Responsible Warfare. US-Iran Case
Author(s): Iulian CHIFU, Cosmin GRIGORESubject(s): Politics / Political Sciences, Politics, Peace and Conflict Studies
Published by: Carol I National Defence University Publishing House
Keywords: Responsible Warfare; Legal; Legitimate; Moral Actions in War; Military Retaliation; Escalation;
Summary/Abstract: In the conundrum of legality, legitimacy, and morality regarding war and war operations, the concept of responsible warfare could find its place. The operational definition of such a concept or even behavior has its place somewhere between the legitimate and moral sides, since an ethical component is present in the idea of responsible warfare, not only in the legitimate access to force and use of military power, but also in the legal component associated with it. In this article, we aim to identify specific pieces of concrete behaviour in times of war that would substantiate this concept and could be a basis for responsible behavior. Our major test case is the recent attack by the US on Iranian nuclear facilities and the counter reaction from the regime of Ayatollahs to retaliate proportionally and avoid escalation. The link between promoting a responsible warfare and the effectiveness of reaching the objectives in war could be, however, instrumental to challenge as well as advocating to any extention of such a practice.
Journal: Bulletin of "Carol I" National Defence University (EN)
- Issue Year: 14/2025
- Issue No: 03
- Page Range: 288-306
- Page Count: 19
- Language: English
