O PUŁAPCE „SKOJARZENIOWEJ” W HUMANISTYCE (NA MARGINESIE UROSZCZENIA S. GAŁKOWSKIEGO W JEGO PRÓBIE „LOGICZNEJ” WYKŁADNI ZNANIECKIEGO)
ON THE “ASSOCIATIONIST” TRAP IN HUMANITIES. (WITHIN THE MARIGIN OF FALSE CLAIM BY S. GALKOWSKI IN HIS EFFORT OF “LOGICAL” EXEGESIS OF ZNANIECKI)

Summary/Abstract: In his introduction the author of this polemic indicates the phenomenon of reductio ad absurdum of Znaniecki’s conception in the exegesis of the addressee of this criticism. Next there is an outline sketched concerning the general perspective of disagreement against the approach by S. Gałkowski. There is also outlined criticism and appraisal towards Znaniecki by the author of this polemics. The text illustrates the trap of an epistemic reading as an ethical abuse of logics. Finally instead of a conclusion one is discussing the ways of treatement of the tradition of humanistic reflection and it warns against interpretative errors committed by the criticised author. The basic error is perceived as the result of domination of application of harmful associations of the leader blocking the way to deeper sense of the conception.

• Details
• Contents