Šarčevićev humanizam za etiku odgovornosti
Abdulah Šarčević’s humanism for responsibility ethics

Summary/Abstract: This study is dealing with responsibility ethics in the context of Šarčević’s concept of humanism with the assumption of the new world ethos pointing to alternative possibilities for developing the differentiated forms of life and knowledge and also the society open to a new and different positioning of man and humanity in the contemporary world. Pointing to the rational experience about the world and life, philosophy appears like the open spiritual reflex to all the existing, contributing like a notion (theory) to the critical and speculative understanding of what is the base to determine and to build values whose character is often regulative in the sense of searching and founding what is for us essential in the context of human relations. However, by approaching the many values in the theoretical and practical discourse is just being bypassed ethic-moral discourse of evaluating values, especially in the context of the phenomenology of human relations. Firstly, it is needed to maintain dialog of ideas, to reconstruct their new discourse with revolving the new world liberating us for human Cosmo-centric habitation and return to what is our own, what is impossible in any way to be controlled. There is not simply spoken about borders of an ethical way of envisaging emerging in the case of equity and moral obligation, but about issues relating to sources, scope, and borders distorting the humanum. Namely, with such approach it is accessed not only to insight into the structure of human monologs but also into the impacts on human relations concerning work and acting, language and thinking, creativity and culturality, sociability and historicity, traditionality and modernity. So simultaneously is opened postulate persisting on critical redefining some essential ethical aspects of human relations within those the reflected differences of ethic-moral phenomena of human reality are born different values like moral-valuable discourses.

• Details
• Contents