Has the CJEU Made the First Step to Put a Stop to the Criminalisation of Migration? Commentary to the Judgement in the Case of JZ in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic Cover Image

Has the CJEU Made the First Step to Put a Stop to the Criminalisation of Migration? Commentary to the Judgement in the Case of JZ in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Has the CJEU Made the First Step to Put a Stop to the Criminalisation of Migration? Commentary to the Judgement in the Case of JZ in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author(s): Anna Magdalena Kosińska
Subject(s): Criminal Law, International Law, Criminology, Migration Studies, Penal Policy, EU-Legislation, Asylum, Refugees, Migration as Policy-fields
Published by: Temida 2
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; criminalisation of migration; Directive 2008/115; entry ban; irregular migration; return policy;

Summary/Abstract: The paper presents a critical discussion of the CJEU judgment in the JZ case (C 806/18), in which the Court interpreted Article 11 of Directive 2008/115 that regulates entry ban issuance. The author asks a question of whether an entry ban as a measure limiting the right to free movement has a moral and legal ground in international law and EU law. Moreover, the author focuses on the problem of the criminalisation of irregular migration - both in the context of the established line of the Court’s case law and in the case of a vague national law standard that penalizes illegal stays - the possibility to apply the criminal law concept of error in law and thus exclusion of criminal liability of an illegal migrant.

  • Issue Year: 6/2021
  • Issue No: 26
  • Page Range: 207-224
  • Page Count: 18
  • Language: English