Wenezuela ma legitymację procesową czynną do zaskarżenia rozporządzenia wprowadzającego wobec niej środki ograniczające — glosa do wyroku TSUE w sprawie Wenezuela przeciwko Radzie Unii Europejskiej z dnia 22 czerwca
Venezuela has standing to bring proceedings against a regulation which introduces restrictive measures against it—commentary to the judgement of the CJEU in the case Venezuela v. council of the European Union of 22nd June
Author(s): Adriana Kalicka-MikołajczykSubject(s): International Law, EU-Legislation, Court case
Published by: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego
Keywords: Venezuela; restrictive measures; legal person; regulatory act; direct application;
Summary/Abstract: The subject of the publication is an analysis of the judgement of the European Court of Justice of June 22nd 2021, C-872/19P. The commented judgement involved an endeavour brought by Venezuela to challenge the validity of certain of restrictive measures adopted by the Council in 2017 in view of the situation in Venezuela. The novel nature of this case where, for the first time, a third State has sought the annulment of restrictive measures before the Union’s judicature. This immediately raised the much broader question of whether a State which is not a member of the European Union is entitled to bring proceedings of this nature before the Court of Justice of the European Union. In commented judgement, the Court of Justice of the European Union held that Venezuela had locus standi to challenge restrictive measures adopted by the Council. In practice, this means that it has granted a third country standing to bring proceedings before the Courts of the European Union to bring an action for annulment of a legal act on the basis of which the Council, within the framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy, imposed restrictive measures on that State.
Journal: Przegląd Prawa i Administracji
- Issue Year: 141/2025
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 237-244
- Page Count: 8
- Language: Polish
