The Urgency of Addressing Foreign Bribery in Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis
The Urgency of Addressing Foreign Bribery in Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis

Summary/Abstract: Foreign bribery involves offering something of value to a foreign official to obtain a business advantage, contributing to illicit transactions that undermine Indonesia’s economic stability, social justice, and institutional integrity. This study emphasises the urgent need for Indonesia to strengthen its anti-bribery legislation by comparing its current framework with those of the United States, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and Poland. The United States enforces the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) rigorously through the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The UK’s Bribery Act 2010 provides a comprehensive framework, enforced by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). Switzerland’s stringent anti-bribery laws under the Swiss Penal Code are supported by robust international cooperation. Poland has made significant progress in combating corruption, including foreign bribery, through the efforts of its Central Anti-Corruption Bureau (CBA) and continuous improvement of its legal framework. In contrast, Indonesia’s current regulations remain less rigorous. Strengthening its legal framework and enforcement mechanisms is therefore essential to effectively combat foreign bribery and safeguard national integrity.

• Details
• Contents