CHALLENGES OF JURIDICAL LANGUAGE. CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE TRIAD: JUSTICE, JURISDICTION, JURISPRUDENCE
CHALLENGES OF JURIDICAL LANGUAGE. CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF THE TRIAD: JUSTICE, JURISDICTION, JURISPRUDENCE

Summary/Abstract: A comparative examination of the triad justice, jurisdiction, and jurisprudence presents indisputable and actual doctrinal and practical interest. The rationale of such an approach, explained in the text of the paper, lies in particular in the need to mitigate the predisposition for confusion, generated by the easy use of these legal language attributes, often stereotypically. Associated with an important segment of the public power, the bringing together of the three concepts is dictated not only by the close semantic notes, but also by the indissoluble link between the legal entities they define. That is why, from the point of view of the positive law, the immediate relationship established between them could be summarized as follows: justice is a primary jurisdiction whose work of judgment is expressed through jurisprudence. From an in-depth vision of the field, with the arguments that the general theory of law brings to attention, the same concepts acquire far wider meanings. On these issues, the present study draws attention, observing the interferences they carry, the dominant aspects and the necessary delimitations involved in the appropriation and correct use of the three concepts announced in the title, enrolling in an exercise dedicated to the concern for the accuracy of the juridical language, defining by consistency and rigor.

• Details
• Contents