Citation practices in the discussion sections of Vietnamese and international economics research articles
Citation practices in the discussion sections of Vietnamese and international economics research articles

Summary/Abstract: This study examines the similarities and differences in citation practices within the discussion sections of 60 English and 60 Vietnamese economics journal articles. Utilizing Thompson and Tribble’s (2001) citation forms and Samraj’s (2013) citation function framework, citations were identified and analyzed using AntConc (version 3.5.6). The findings indicate that Vietnamese scholars tend to employ fewer citations overall, demonstrating a marked preference for integral citations that emphasize authorial presence and establish credibility. In contrast, international authors predominantly use non-integral citations, which aligns with the impersonal and objective tone characteristic of English academic discourse. Additionally, international research articles demonstrate a higher citation density, indicating extensive engagement with prior literature and a stronger reliance on intertextuality. Analysis of citation functions further indicates that international authors incorporate citations more rigorously in theoretical discussions, thereby situating their work within broader scholarly discourse, whereas Vietnamese researchers tend to favor self-explanatory reasoning and practical recommendations. These insights contribute to an in-depth understanding of how citation practices are shaped by various scholarly traditions and academic conventions. The study offers valuable implications for educators, researchers, and academic institutions by highlighting the need for tailored strategies to enhance research writing practices in diverse cultural contexts.

• Details
• Contents