Why are practitioners not realists about animal models of anxiety and depression?
Why are practitioners not realists about animal models of anxiety and depression?
Author(s): Andrei Ionuţ MărăşoiuSubject(s): Philosophy, Special Branches of Philosophy, Philosophy of Science
Published by: Институт по философия и социология при БАН
Keywords: animal models; psychiatric conditions; analogical reasoning; scientific realism; model validity
Summary/Abstract: Researchers and practitioners rarely take on a realist attitude about animal models in psychiatry. Why does this happen? I will argue that even the best among current models fail to satisfy two requirements that demand care in balancing them one against the other: the psychological construct requirement and the mechanistic requirement. Failure to satisfy them explains why researchers do not believe in them. I conclude by arguing that, if one were to be a realist about animal models in psychiatry, interventionist and representational aspects of that attitude would be inextricably mixed.
Journal: Balkan Journal of Philosophy
- Issue Year: XVIII/2026
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 86-98
- Page Count: 13
- Language: English
