Why are practitioners not realists about animal models of anxiety and depression? Cover Image

Why are practitioners not realists about animal models of anxiety and depression?
Why are practitioners not realists about animal models of anxiety and depression?

Author(s): Andrei Ionuţ Mărăşoiu
Subject(s): Philosophy, Special Branches of Philosophy, Philosophy of Science
Published by: Институт по философия и социология при БАН
Keywords: animal models; psychiatric conditions; analogical reasoning; scientific realism; model validity

Summary/Abstract: Researchers and practitioners rarely take on a realist attitude about animal models in psychiatry. Why does this happen? I will argue that even the best among current models fail to satisfy two requirements that demand care in balancing them one against the other: the psychological construct requirement and the mechanistic requirement. Failure to satisfy them explains why researchers do not believe in them. I conclude by arguing that, if one were to be a realist about animal models in psychiatry, interventionist and representational aspects of that attitude would be inextricably mixed.

  • Issue Year: XVIII/2026
  • Issue No: 1
  • Page Range: 86-98
  • Page Count: 13
  • Language: English
Toggle Accessibility Mode