A Comparative Analysis of Sustainability Reporting Frameworks
A Comparative Analysis of Sustainability Reporting Frameworks
Author(s): Liana Ioana PARASCHIVSubject(s): Economy, Supranational / Global Economy, Business Economy / Management
Published by: EDITURA ASE
Keywords: Sustainability; Triple Bottom Line; Corporate Social Responsibility; stakeholders; stakeholders’ theory; sustainability reporting; sustainability standards;
Summary/Abstract: This paper examines sustainability reporting within the broader context of sustainability, stakeholder theory, and the progressive adoption of non-financial disclosure. The study builds on the foundational developments in social and environmental reporting to examine key sustainability frameworks: Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the SASB Standards, and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). Using a qualitative comparative approach, the paper evaluates these frameworks across six criteria: primary purpose and target users, scope and thematic coverage, concept of materiality, degree of standardization, regulatory status, and comparability of disclosed information. The findings highlight the coexistence of multiple frameworks, reflecting diverse stakeholder needs and conceptualizations of materiality, as well as comparability and consistency in sustainability reporting.
Journal: Revista de Management Comparat Internațional
- Issue Year: 27/2026
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 267-276
- Page Count: 10
- Language: English
