We kindly inform you that, as long as the subject affiliation of our 300.000+ articles is in progress, you might get unsufficient or no results on your third level or second level search. In this case, please broaden your search criteria.
recenzja z: Krzysztof Zagórski, Andrzej K. Koźmiński, Witold Morawski, Katarzyna Piotrowska, Gavin Rae, Marta Strumińska-Kutra, "Postawy ekonomiczne w czasach niepewności. Ekonomiczna wyobraźnia Polaków 2012–2014"
More...
This is a critical review of: Elżbieta Starek, Grzegorz Kotłowski, Łacińskie inskrypcje w kościołach Gdańska. Śródmieście, Pelplin 2015, Bernardinum, 165x235, 236 s. ISBN: 978-83-7823-636-8.
More...
Review about Gražina Marija Martinaitienė. Audiniai ir jų splavos Lietuvos Didžiosios kunigaikštystės istoriniuose šaltiniuose.
More...
Review about Marcin Zgliński. No wożytny prospekt organowy i jego twórcy
More...
Review of the book Transnacionalni socijalni prostori: migrantske veze preko granica Hrvatske written by Simona Kuti and Saša Božić.
More...
Reviwe of the book Uvod u kulturnu geografiju written by Laura Šakaja.
More...Rec.: Marian Bielecki, Kłopoty z innością. Kraków 2012
The review discusses Marian Bielecki’s book, the subject of which is broadly understood “otherness” and its complicated relations with “identity” examined in Witold Gombrowicz’s or Miron Białoszewski’s works. Notions such as “abiect,” “foreigness,” “camp” or “queer” are focal in Bielecki’s considerations, and he treats them as synonyms or variants of “otherness.”
More...Rec.: Agnieszka Mrozik, Akuszerki transformacji. Kobiety, literatura i władza w Polsce po 1989 roku. Warszawa 2012. „Lupa Obscura”
The review is a description of Agnieszka Mrozik’s book "Akuszerki transformacji. Kobiety, literatura i władza w Polsce po 1989 roku" ("Midwives of Transformation. Women, Literature and Power in Poland after 1989") on modern women literature viewed from the context of most crucial changes, problems and social processes in Poland at the time of transformation. The key category of female (and male) identity for the analyses proves a dynamic and complex concept, embroiled not only into gender matters, but also class and national and ethnic ones. The author explicitly points at the important patterns of identification that dominate also in literature - important from the point of view of political memory areas of concealment and denial.
More...Rec.: Teorie wywrotowe. Antologia przekładów. Pod redakcją naukową Agnieszki Gajewskiej. Poznań 2012
The review discusses the volume "Teorie wywrotowe. Antologia przekładów" ("Subversive Theories. Anthology of Translations") edited by Agnieszka Gajewska, a monumental work which contains most important, so far unpublished papers from the borderline of various postfeminist theories. The diversity of the translations reveals not only the richness of emerging perspectives, but also a multitude of theories which have ‘subversively’ reshaped or are shaping the contemporary humanistic thought.
More...Rec.: Bjørnar Olsen, W obronie rzeczy. Archeologia i ontologia przedmiotów. Przełożyła Bożena Shallcross. Warszawa 2013. „Nowa Humanistyka”
The text is an attempt at a critical assessment of the view on the project of appreciation of material aspects of culture and of pointing at their constitutive role in shaping the social “everyday commonness” as presented in Bjørnar Olsen’s book "In Defense of Things. Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects". The researcher, taking a stand against binary oppositions which follow Cartesian marginalisation of matter as “extended thing,” does not avoid stumbles and inconsistencies. They are revealed mainly in combining, as in bricolage, often remote modes of thinking about things (juxtaposing Heidegger to Latour, in which the former’s peculiarity of thinking, seems controversial). Heidegger’s conceptions of understanding proposed by Olsen induces the reader to ponder on a possibility of reconciling “emancipation” discourse (going in the direction in which “the defense of things” follows) with non-linear one (opposing the idea of progress) view on history. Olsen also points at aporias that scientific discourse is entangled in when he is trying to describe what in an imperceptible and “reserved” way is founded by social reality.
More...