We kindly inform you that, as long as the subject affiliation of our 300.000+ articles is in progress, you might get unsufficient or no results on your third level or second level search. In this case, please broaden your search criteria.
The topicality of the Holy Faders has been subject to research on several occasions, both in Romania and abroad, yet, no discourse suffi cient in itself has been accomplished. The purpose of this study is to create an overview of the previous research results and to add new elements to a strictly Orthodox perspective on the topicality of the Holy Fathers. This overview encompasses the conclusions of the author’s study and research in his attempt to reclaim a so-called Introduction to Patristics. The Holy Fathers, their thinking and theology remain a constant reference in the Orthodox Church and theology. Unfortunately, nowadays, the patristic text is rarely referred to in the Orthodox academic circles, which usually prefer a theology that doesn’t refl ect the patristic teachings. The contemporary man is unable to fi nd himself in the study of the Holy Father’s words, and no longer has the desire to seek answers to his problems by approaching the theology of the Church. The Fathers’ topicality, importance, and authority is confi rmed by God’s topicality, importance, and authority; thus, their validity is proven by the truths they express and by the rules of life they promote, at all times, for every Christian. This presentation is intended not only as a highlight of certain contemporary Orthodox theological aspects, but as a reminder of the importance of the patristic theology for the theology of the Church.
More...
The encomia of Metropolitan Nicolae Colan praise and preach the great Christian truths, along with their holidays and martyrs, concurring to the limitless praise of the Father and His Son Jesus Christ. On a different level, consistent to the idea that the writing must follow reality, to praise and adequately evoke historical personalities, Nicolae Colan also presented in his writings pieces of history, as seen through his own eyes, which, today, help us see more comprehensively various events and phenomena. To the same image, it also contributes the diversity of the personalities evoked and praised, from Church fi gures like Andrei Şaguna, Roman Ciorogariu or Nicolae Bălan, to laic fi gures from various fi elds of activity: Octavian Goga, general Averescu, king Carol the 2nd, Ion Luca Caragiale, Sextil Puşcariu, as well as peasant Petrache Lupu, and so many other important fi gures, which shared with Nicolae Colan their creed, their values, their faith, and devotion to the Church, language and nation, everything surrounded by a specifi c Transylvanian spirit, a spirit he believed in and cultivated rigorously.
More...
This article attempts to succinctly present John of Damascus’ teachings about passions and virtues, as well as the papers where these teachings are presented. In the fi rst part, the author refers to the paper Sacred Parallels, considered by scholars the Holy Father’s essential work with regard to moral-ascetic teachings. Nothing more than a large anthology of Bible texts and patristic texts, the paper is not representative for the saint’s teachings. The author then presents the moral-ascetic elements from John of Damascus’ theological works, especially in his dogmatic writings. Through this step, it is once again acknowledged the fact that, in the Orthodox faith, the dogmatic and the moral attitude go hand in hand. The last part is specifi cally concerned with the moral-ascetic works of the saint, On the Eight Spirits of Evil and On Virtues and Vices. The author presents the contents of these two short writings, as well as the most important ideas, with a special focus on the second work, included by Nicodemus of the Holy Mountain in his Philokalia. Through this, John of Damascus – par excellence, the dogmatic mind of our Church – earned himself a consecrated place among the ascetic and neptic Church Fathers.
More...
Up until recent times, the love for homeland was a noble feeling, a duty of honor. Today it’s either extinguished in favor of a limitless cosmopolitism or altered, being visible but in unimportant areas. Either way, the mystical soul of the love for homeland and its connection to God has been lost to a great extent. Normally, earthly homeland should be a mirror of the eternal, celestial Homeland, to whom the natural man aspires naturally through everything he does. Suddenly becoming a gift, as well as the fruit of a sacrifi ce fulfi lled by many generations, paid in blood many times, the Homeland must be served with defended and intensifi ed faith, as much as it is in everyone’s power, by the addition of personal deeds, accordingly. The great artists are those who fulfi ll and assume this responsibility to a greater extent, thus becoming, in happy cases, voices of their peoples in front of the world and, especially, in front of God. For Andrei Tarkovsky “Homeland is the country where you were born, where you were raised, and whose roots and culture you possess.” As a result, one’s homeland means landscape, history, culture… The spiritual element of the homeland is the one prevailing in Tarkovsky’s work; and, inside it, naturally, the Christian Orthodox faith he assumes and confesses, through his work and words. There are two situations which can render a more dramatic character of the love for Homeland, thus emphasizing it: the war (especially the one against invaders) and the exile. Andrei Tarkovsky knew them both. He knew the Great War to Defense the homeland directly, by the diffi culties that reverberated into his life, and indirectly, by his father’s participation to this war. Later, he also knew the exile, in which he was practically pushed by the hostile attitude of the political and cultural Soviet authorities, which obviously hindered his work. Though in exile, Tarkovsky carried his Homeland along, in his heart. He too was sick of that nostalghia he so often talked about. This thing is visible in his movies, whose feeling and tones are Russian, even when their space and time seem indeterminate. The love for homeland is treated in one way or another in each of the movies directed by this great director, especially by referring to its politic and cultural history. Tarkovsky’s heroes experience nostalghia for their Homeland, and, intricately, for its sufferings, but also for their own sufferings in relation to the Homeland. They also feel responsible for its spiritual prosperity and, thus, even more often, they experience guilt when failing to do so. They are concerned with its evolution and its status when this becomes precarious from a spiritual point view, with everything this implies, including serious moral misconducts. As such, they try to save everything that can be saved. In Tarkovsky’s movies, we fi nd debates on and feelings for a concentric and successive series of homelands, from that of the childho
More...