POLITIČKO-PRAVNI I ZAKONSKI POLOŽAJ GRADA SARAJEVA U SISTEMU LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI: MOGUĆNOSTI REFORME NADLEŽNOSTI I TERITORIJALNE ORGANIZACIJE
JURIDICO-POLITICAL AND LEGAL POSITION OF THE CITY OF SARAJEVO IN THE SYSTEM OF LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: POSSIBILITIES FOR REFORMING JURISDICTION AND TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION
Contributor(s): Mirko Pejanović (Editor)
Subject(s): Politics, Constitutional Law, Governance, Government/Political systems, Political economy, Comparative politics, Social development, Policy, planning, forecast and speculation, Rural and urban sociology, Economic development, Inter-Ethnic Relations, EU-Legislation
Published by: Akademija Nauka i Umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine
Keywords: Sarajevo; politics; governance; legislation; Constitution; development; reform possibilities;
Summary/Abstract: Od obnove državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine na Prvom zasjedanju ZAVNOBiH-a 1943. godine i donošenja Ustava Narodne Republike Bosne i Hercegovine 1946. godine Grad Sarajevo ima politički i ustavno-pravni status glavnog grada Bosne i Hercegovine. Status Sarajeva kao glavnog grada Bosne i Hercegovine utemeljen je i u Dejtonskom mirovnom sporazumu unutar Aneksa IV Ustava Bosne i Hercegovine. Tokom višedecenijskog razvoja Sarajevo je od 1945. do 1992. godine postiglo nove domete u urbanom, ekonomskom i kulturnom razvoju. Značajan uspon u ekonomsko-socijalnom i urbanom razvoju Sarajevo postiže u okviru projekta pripreme i održavanja XIV zimskih olimpijskih igara 1984. godine. Sa Zimskim olimpijskim igrama Sarajevo dobija planetarnu promociju svog dotadašnjeg urbanog i kulturnog razvoja kao glavnog grada Bosne i Hercegovine. Sarajevo je na temelju stečenog iskustva antifašističkog otpora okupatoru zemlje u Drugom svjetskom ratu uspješno organizovalo svoje ljudske potencijale za odbranu grada u vremenu njegove, u novijoj istoriji najduže vojne opsade u ratu protiv suverene države Bosne i Hercegovine od 1992. do 1995. godine. Time je Sarajevo, kao glavni grad suverene i nezavisne države Bosne i Hercegovine, imalo jednu od glavnih uloga u odbrani suvereniteta, integriteta i istorijskog multietničkog bića Bosne i Hercegovine. Dejtonskim mirovnim sporazumom Sarajevo je sačuvalo svoju istorijski oblikovanu urbanu cjelinu na prostoru: Starog Grada, Centra, Novog Sarajeva, Novog Grada, Ilidže i Vogošće. Međutim, u vremenu uspostavljanja Kantona Sarajevo 1996. godine ukinut je dotadašnji pravni status Grada Sarajeva kao autonomne jedinice lokalne samouprave. Iza toga je Skupština Kantona Sarajevo 1997. godine usvojila Amandman I na Ustav Kantona Sarajevo kojim je uspostavljen Grad Sarajevo, ali bez punih samostalnih nadležnosti i sa suženom teritorijalnom organizacijom. U okviru Centra za istraživanje razvoja lokalne i regionalne samouprave Odjeljenja društvenih nauka unutar Akademije nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine tokom 2019. i 2020. godine izvedeno je istraživanje na temu Sarajevo grad i regija u vremenu i prostoru – studija. U zaključnim stajalištima istraživački tim zagovara nužnost promjene postojećeg ustavno-zakonskog položaja Grada Sarajeva u pogledu nadležnosti i teritorijalne organizacije.1 U nastojanju da se dođe do sveobuhvatne naučne elaboracije bitnih aspekata reforme ustavno-zakonske nadležnosti i teritorijalne organizacije Grada Sarajeva inicirana je priprema i održavanje međunarodne naučne konferencije Političko-pravni i zakonski položaj Grada Sarajeva u sistemu lokalne samouprave u Bosni i Hercegovini: mogućnosti reforme nadležnosti i teritorijalne organizacije. Za zbornik radova je pripremljeno 15 referata. Autorski referati pripremljeni za zbornik radova konferencije obuhvataju više tematskih područja: ustavno-pravni, politološki i sociološki aspekti položaja Grada Sarajeva u sistemu lokalne samouprave Bosne i Hercegovine; komparativna analiza ustavno-zakonskog položaja glavnih gradova Slovenije, Hrvatske, Srbije i Bosne i Hercegovine, kao i referati iz oblasti urbanog i ekonomskog razvoja. Referate za konferenciju su napisali: prof. dr. Snežana Đorđević: Reforme organizacije i podele nadležnosti grada Beograda (2000–2022); prof. dr. Mehmed Bublin: Razvoj Grada Sarajeva; prof. dr. Ivana Domljan / prof. dr. Vjekoslav Domljan: Neminovnost razvoja znanjskih gradova; prof. dr. Elvis Fejzić: Nova politička vizija gradske autonomije: izazovi teritorijalne i institucionalne reorganizacije Grada Sarajeva; prof. dr. Franc Grad: Lokalna samouprava v Republiki Sloveniji s posebnim ozirom na položaj glavnega mesta; prof. dr. Zijad Hasić Komparativni pogled na normativno i institucionalno uređenje glavnih gradova Beograda i Zagreba s osvrtom na glavni grad Sarajevo; prof. dr. Pavle Mijović: Rekonfiguracija urbanog Sarajeva. Od agonističkog pluralizma prema društvenoj koheziji; prof. dr. Slaviša Orlović: Model izbora skupštine grada, gradonačelnika i gradskog veća Grada Beogradu u uporednoj perspektivi; prof. dr. Jasmina Osmanković / dr. sci. Nataša Pelja Tabori: Uloga Grada Sarajeva u razvoju regije – institucionalni i financijski kapacitet; akademik Mirko Pejanović: Ustavno-pravni položaj Grada Sarajeva u postdejtonskom periodu sa uklonom na mogućnost reforme nadležnosti i teritorijalne organizacije; dr. sci. Nataša Pelja Tabori / prof. dr. Jasmina Osmanković: Prostorno i urbanističko planiranje Sarajeva – prošlost, sadašnjost, budućnost; prof. dr. Elmir Sadiković: Glavni gradovi u nacionalnim sistemima lokalne samouprave – komparativna analiza Sarajeva, Beograda, Zagreba i Ljubljane; prof. dr. Kasim Trnka: Principi rehabilitacije ustavne pozicije Grada Sarajeva i mr. Amir Vuk Zec: Sarajevo će biti, sve drugo će proći. Važan doprinos u pripremi referata dali su recenzenti: dopisni član ANUBiH-a Fikret Čaušević, prof. dr. Danica Fink-Hafner (Fakultet za družbene vede v Ljubljani), prof. dr. Muhamed Hamidović, prof. dr. Ivan Koprić (Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu), akademik Slavo Kukić, akademik Miodrag N. Simović i akademik Miloš Trifković Osim autorskih studija, odnosno referata za zbornik radova, priređen je i prilog u vidu analize o provedenom empirijskom istraživanju. U istraživanju je izvršeno anketiranje vijećnika u šest gradskih opština: Stari Grad, Centar, Novo Sarajevo, Novi Grad, Ilidža, Vogošća i Gradskom vijeću Sarajeva o njihovim stavovima o mogućnosti reforme nadležnosti i teritorijalne organizacije Grada Sarajeva. Kao prilog, pripremljen je i esej ratnog gradonačelnika Sarajeva, prof. dr. Tarika Kupusovića. Ideje i prijedlozi o mogućnosti reforme nadležnosti i teritorijalne organizacije Grada Sarajeva što su elaborirani u referatima za međunarodnu naučnu konferenciju mogu u godinama koje dolaze biti valjana osnova za donošenje odluka u nadležnim tijelima: Skupštini Kantona Sarajevo, Gradskom vijeću Sarajeva i opštinskim vijećima Starog Grada, Centra, Novog Sarajeva, Novog Grada, Ilidže i Vogošće o reformi nadležnosti i teritorijalne organizacije Grada Sarajeva.
Series: Posebna izdanja ANUBiH
- E-ISBN-13: 978-9926-410-78-0
- Print-ISBN-13: 978-9926-410-78-0
- Page Count: 326
- Publication Year: 2022
- Language: Bosnian, Slovenian, Serbian
PRINCIPI REHABILITACIJE USTAVNE POZICIJE GRADA SARAJEVA
PRINCIPI REHABILITACIJE USTAVNE POZICIJE GRADA SARAJEVA
(PRINCIPLES OF REHABILITATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF THE CITY OF SARAJEVO)
- Author(s):Kasim Trnka
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Politics, Constitutional Law, Governance, Public Finances
- Page Range:17-26
- No. of Pages:10
- Keywords:City of Sarajevo; constitutional principles; territorial coverage; democratic structure; competencies; financing;
- Summary/Abstract:Today’s constitutional position of the City of Sarajevo is far from the requirements and needs it should have, not only as the State capital, but also as the most developed economic, educational, scientific and cultural center. In the 1970s, the City played such a role, but today, due to international and domestic circumstances, it is largely marginalized. In order to rehabilitate its constitutional position, it is necessary, after conducting multidisciplinary studies, to determine the principles of a new concept of the City that would include, in particular: natural territorial coverage; compliance with the European Charter of Local SelfGovernment; a democratic structure that includes direct election of the mayor and members of the City Council; precise delineation of competencies with the Canton and municipalities and stable sources of funding.
USTAVNO-PRAVNI POLOŽAJ GRADA SARAJEVA U POSTDEJTONSKOM PERIODU SA UKLONOM NA MOGUĆNOST REFORME NADLEŽNOSTI I TERITORIJALNE ORGANIZACIJE
USTAVNO-PRAVNI POLOŽAJ GRADA SARAJEVA U POSTDEJTONSKOM PERIODU SA UKLONOM NA MOGUĆNOST REFORME NADLEŽNOSTI I TERITORIJALNE ORGANIZACIJE
(CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL POSITION OF THE CITY OF SARAJEVO IN THE POST-DAYTON PERIOD WITH REMOVAL ON THE POSSIBILITY OF COMPETENCE REFORM AND TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATIONS)
- Author(s):Mirko Pejanović
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Constitutional Law, Governance, Military history, Political history, Transformation Period (1990 - 2010), Present Times (2010 - today), Wars in Jugoslavia
- Page Range:27-39
- No. of Pages:13
- Keywords:Bosnia and Herzegovina; City of Sarajevo; Dayton Peace Agreement; Canton of Sarajevo; Constitution; European Charter on Local Self-Government; reforming jurisdiction and territorial organization;
- Summary/Abstract:During the five centuries from the 15th to the end of the 20th century, the City of Sarajevo developed into a historical, social and urban entity. In the second half of the 20th century, the City of Sarajevo, as the capital of the Socialist Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, established and developed its self-governing autonomy in the management of urban, economic and cultural development. The city of Sarajevo reached new heights of urban and economic development during the realization of the project of holding the XIV Winter Olympic Games in 1984. After the announcement of the results of the citizens’ referendum on the sovereign and independent status of the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1992, the city of Sarajevo was exposed to a military siege from 1992 to 1995. The Dayton Peace Agreement established peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the City of Sarajevo was constitutionally designated as the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina. With the establishment of the Sarajevo Canton in 1996, the property and jurisdiction of the City of Sarajevo was transferred to the Sarajevo Canton. Amendment I to the Constitution of the Canton of Sarajevo established the City of Sarajevo without specific responsibilities and with a reduced territorial organization. Based on the conducted research, published in the study “Sarajevo city and region in time and space-study” (Pejanović et al., 2020), the paper provides a complete elaboration of the constitutional and legal position of the City of Sarajevo, within the basics of the concept of full jurisdiction of the City of Sarajevo and its new territorial organizations.
KOMPARATIVNI POGLED NA NORMATIVNO I INSTITUCIONALNO UREĐENJE GLAVNIH GRADOVA BEOGRADA I ZAGREBA S OSVRTOM NA GLAVNI GRAD SARAJEVO
KOMPARATIVNI POGLED NA NORMATIVNO I INSTITUCIONALNO UREĐENJE GLAVNIH GRADOVA BEOGRADA I ZAGREBA S OSVRTOM NA GLAVNI GRAD SARAJEVO
(A COMPARATIVE VIEW OF THE NORMATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT OF THE CAPITAL CITIES OF BELGRADE AND ZAGREB WITH REFERENCE TO THE CAPITAL CITY OF SARAJEVO)
- Author(s):Zijad Hasić
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Constitutional Law, Governance, Government/Political systems, Comparative politics, Comparative Law
- Page Range:40-71
- No. of Pages:32
- Keywords:local self-government; capital city; city municipalities; normative regulation; institutional arrangement; comparative review;
- Summary/Abstract:In the course of its history, Bosnia and Herzegovina went through various forms of territorial and political organization. Existing in various empires and republics, it went through different forms of territorial organization, depending on the government, but also its geographical position and its other factors. At the local level, passing through cooperative forms (Puljiz, 1991), as forms of social organization in a traditional village, it also changed the territorial and political forms of organization. Today they are municipalities and cities. On the international level, the capitals have important roles, which they should perform well. Thus, for example, the UN requests, in order to implement the 2030 Agenda, that the countries of the European Union, as well as other member states, undertake activities to plan the future of these entities. The UN requests that by the end of 2018, all member states draw up long-term national plans on numerous issues that need to be planned and implemented until 2030. And the City of Sarajevo should actively approach this obligation and make realistic and ambitious plans, and then implement them. From a normative point of view, the competences of the City of Belgrade and the City of Zagreb are more precisely and completely defined in relation to the position of the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the City of Sarajevo. This is supported by the existence of special laws on the capital, which regulate all important issues of the City of Belgrade and the City of Zagreb. A similar law should be passed for the City of Sarajevo, appreciating the nature and complexity of the problem and regardless of the fact that there are many norms governing its function. Some relations should be regulated by law, and others by lower acts. The issue of organization, education, jurisdiction, institutional organization, etc. are matters of the greatest importance for the city as a unit of local self-government, so such a regulation should be adopted. It is noticeable that in Serbia the units of local self-government are municipalities and cities. It is obvious that the municipalities that are part of the City of Belgrade are not local selfgovernment units. Those municipalities that are not part of the city are units of local selfgovernment. Those municipalities that are part of the city are highly dependent on the city, and with their competences that they received from the city, they perform tasks for the city and are paid for those activities. It is noticeable that in Serbia the units of local self-government are municipalities and cities. It is obvious that the municipalities that are part of the City of Belgrade are not local selfgovernment units. Those municipalities that are not part of the city are units of local selfgovernment. Those municipalities that are part of the city are highly dependent on the city, and with their competences that they received from the city, they perform tasks for the city and are paid for those activities. The regulations related to the competences of the City of Belgrade provide for the direct participation of citizens in the implementation of local self-government. I think that the activities of the city of Belgrade, which are standardized in this way, should be similarly standardized in the most important acts of the city of Sarajevo. The normative structure of the City of Zagreb is very precisely regulated by numerous legal and by-laws. The precise regulation of these issues eliminates the possibility of conflicts between the competences of the capital city and its municipalities, so this should also be taken into account in normative activities for the City of Sarajevo. The significant issue of regulating the jurisdiction of the cities of Belgrade and Zagreb is visible in the precise and complete regulation of the issue of goods in public use. Goods in public use are goods that give strength to the city and are protected in a very good way in the cities of Zagreb and Belgrade. It should be seen whether similar normative solutions can be applied to the City of Sarajevo. An analysis of the normative and institutional structure of the capital cities of Belgrade, Zagreb and Sarajevo shows that they have something to offer each other. The experiences of each of these cities can be an incentive for better normative and institutional arrangement of each of these cities.
NOVA POLITIČKA VIZIJA GRADSKE AUTONOMIJE: IZAZOVI TERITORIJALNE I INSTITUCIONALNE REORGANIZACIJE GRADA SARAJEVA
NOVA POLITIČKA VIZIJA GRADSKE AUTONOMIJE: IZAZOVI TERITORIJALNE I INSTITUCIONALNE REORGANIZACIJE GRADA SARAJEVA
(NEW POLITICAL VISION OF CITY AUTONOMY: CHALLENGES OF TERRITORIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL REORGANIZATION OF THE CITY OF SARAJEVO)
- Author(s):Elvis Fejzić
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Politics, Constitutional Law, Governance
- Page Range:72-91
- No. of Pages:20
- Keywords:state; city; politics; constitution; government; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Sarajevo;
- Summary/Abstract:All political communities during their historical development go through a process of complicated transformation, which has social, political and economic implications. Given that states – as actors of transnational politics – are affected by processes of permanent transformation, which requires them to constantly reposition themselves and adapt to the changed political context, subnational communities from the sphere of regional, city and local politics are also covered by these changes. The aforementioned political transformation can also be detected in post-socialist countries, i.e., at the subnational levels of government in those political communities. In this sense, special importance is attached to the development of city autonomy and cities in general in the conditions of the post-socialist transition, but also of neoliberal globalization. The development of the City of Sarajevo in post-socialist and post-Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina is not entirely free from sketchy extra-state political and economic influences. However, its overall transformation and political development is decisively limited by the complicated and insufficient domestic constitutional and legal regulations, which reduced the original political competences and city autonomy of the City of Sarajevo, which prevented and stopped the process of functional territorial and institutional reorganization. Bearing the above in mind, it is necessary to redefine and change the current political status and competences of the City of Sarajevo – in accordance with the normative functions of city autonomy – without which it is not possible to plan its long-term and sustainable development, which would simultaneously satisfy the needs of its citizens and reduce political tensions between political center and periphery.
REKONFIGURACIJA URBANOG SARAJEVA. OD AGONISTIČKOG PLURALIZMA PREMA DRUŠTVENOJ KOHEZIJI
REKONFIGURACIJA URBANOG SARAJEVA. OD AGONISTIČKOG PLURALIZMA PREMA DRUŠTVENOJ KOHEZIJI
(RECONFIGURATION OF URBAN SARAJEVO. FROM AGONISTIC PLURALISM TO SOCIAL COHESION)
- Author(s):Pavle Mijović
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Politics, Governance, Rural and urban sociology, Inter-Ethnic Relations
- Page Range:92-106
- No. of Pages:15
- Keywords:Sarajevo; agonistic pluralism; social cohesion; urban reconfiguration;
- Summary/Abstract:Paper entitled Reconfiguration of urban Sarajevo. From agonistic pluralism to social cohesion, is articulated in two interconnected parts. The first part of the paper deals, based on insights from urban sociology, the social perspective of the city, which is revealed as a peculiarity of human association and is related to a specific form of life. The ethnoterritorial destruction of the city, which marked the 1990s, redefines comprehensive human relations, disrupting the original urban dynamics. Despite this, cities are not reduced to monolithic constructions of the exclusive, but remain “deposits of anthropological memory”, and are tied, in the words of Bogdana Bogdanović, “to the better part of the human being”. The second part of the paper discusses agonistic pluralism and related challenges of urban and political cohesion. We start from the phrase “political Sarajevo”, which, along with other connotations, expresses skepticism about the possibility of urban and socio-political cohesion. The last part of the paper confronts two models, deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism, as models that can encourage favorable dynamics for the development of social cohesion, and we propose the transformation and reconfiguration of conflict dynamics in various forms of social cohesion.
LOKALNA SAMOUPRAVA V REPUBLIKI SLOVENIJI S POSEBNIM OBZIROM NA POLOŽAJ GLAVNEGA MESTA
LOKALNA SAMOUPRAVA V REPUBLIKI SLOVENIJI S POSEBNIM OBZIROM NA POLOŽAJ GLAVNEGA MESTA
(LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA WITH SPECIAL RESPECT TO THE LOCATION OF THE CAPITAL CITY)
- Author(s):Franc Grad
- Language:Slovenian
- Subject(s):Politics, Constitutional Law, Governance, Government/Political systems
- Page Range:109-129
- No. of Pages:21
- Keywords:local self-government; constitution; legislation; city municipality; capital city;
- Summary/Abstract:Local self-government in Slovenia is comparable to local self-government in other Central European countries. The local self-government system is based on the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia and the European Charter of Local Self-Government. It is particularly important that the Constitution guarantees local self-government in Slovenia, which cannot therefore be abolished. The legal regulation of local self-government is determined in the legislation, mainly by the Act on Local Self-Government, which systematically regulates local self-government. In addition to it, local self-government is regulated at the systemic level by the Municipal Financing Act and the Local Elections Act, as well as a series of laws that regulate individual areas of social life. The Local Self-Government Act defines the city municipality as a special type of municipality, which also includes the city of Ljubljana, which is defined by the constitution as the capital of the Republic of Slovenia. The legal status of the capital city is specifically determined in the special Act on the Capital City of Slovenia, which determines the position of Ljubljana as the capital. The law primarily determines the special tasks and duties of Ljubljana as the capital of Slovenia, as well as the financial resources that belong to it for the performance of these tasks.
REFORME ORGANIZACIJE I PODELE NADLEŽNOSTI GRADA BEOGRADA (2000-2022)
REFORME ORGANIZACIJE I PODELE NADLEŽNOSTI GRADA BEOGRADA (2000-2022)
(REFORMS OF THE ORGANIZATION AND DIVISION OF COMPETENCES OF THE CITY OF BELGRADE (2000-2022))
- Author(s):Snežana S. Đorđević
- Language:Serbian
- Subject(s):Politics, Governance, Political history, Transformation Period (1990 - 2010), Present Times (2010 - today)
- Page Range:130-150
- No. of Pages:21
- Keywords:division of competences of the city of Belgrade; decentralization; democracy; subsidiarity; participatory decision-making;
- Summary/Abstract:The subject of this article is a description of the reforms of the organization and functioning of the city of Belgrade after the year 2000, with an emphasis on the current situation. The most important part of this analysis is the way of division of responsibilities between the state, city and city municipalities as well as local communities as a sub-municipal level of local government. The work follows the structure of the essential aspects of the local government system: status, elections, organization of government, jurisdiction, financing, to a lesser extent services, service provision, but most of these topics are integrated into the text. Emphasis is placed on the division of responsibilities and to some extent on financial regulation. The aim of the work is to analyze the instruments of democratization (the possibility of citizens’ involvement in decision-making) and the development of entrepreneurial capacities of the city of Belgrade, because it has greater potential than other local self-government units in Serbia to provide a greater scope and better quality of services due to economies of scale. Research question: Is the model of Belgrade’s organization democratic enough, to what extent is it decentralized (especially with regard to the division of responsibilities between the city and city municipalities as well as the form of direct involvement of citizens in decisionmaking processes) and does it in principle correspond to the needs of citizens and the community (tailored services according to the needs of citizens)? Methods: The paper will use the analysis of the content of documents (legal regulations and the legal model of city planning) as well as studies in this area, then comparative experiences of the planning of Belgrade from various stages of development and synthesis (deduction) of all experiences into some more general knowledge that can be used in improving the organization of Belgrade and other cities. This article is done as a case study of Belgrade. In her work, the author used her decades of experience in the reforms of Belgrade’s organization (decentralization, democratization, modernization of management). For this text, numerous public debates and conversations with officials of city municipalities and the city from all stages of reforms, as well as at the present time, are of great importance. They give this study a stronger connection to real life and practical problems, challenges and solutions made. Expected results: This analysis is a good basis for learning from other cities’ experience - good and bad practices of the functioning of Belgrade.
GLAVNI GRADOVI U NACIONALNIM SISTEMIMA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE - KOMPARATIVNA ANALIZA SARAJEVA, BEOGRADA, ZAGREBA I LJUBLJANE
GLAVNI GRADOVI U NACIONALNIM SISTEMIMA LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE - KOMPARATIVNA ANALIZA SARAJEVA, BEOGRADA, ZAGREBA I LJUBLJANE
(CAPITAL CITIES IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SARAJEVO, BELGRADE, ZAGREB AND LJUBLJANA)
- Author(s):Elmir Sadiković
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Politics, Constitutional Law, Governance, Government/Political systems, Comparative politics, EU-Legislation
- Page Range:151-165
- No. of Pages:15
- Keywords:constitution; local self-government; city; territorial organization; European Charter on Local Self-Government;
- Summary/Abstract:U radu je izvedena komparativna analiza ustavne pozicije i organizacije lokalne samouprave u glavnim gradovima: Ljubljana, Zagreb, Beograd, Podgorica i Sarajevo. U komparativnoj analizi modela lokalne samouprave u glavnim gradovima su posebno uzeti u obzir aspekti ustavnog statusa glavnog grada kao jedinice lokalne samouprave; teritorijalna organizacija; obim samoupravnih nadležnosti u vršenju javnih poslova te institucionalna organizacija gradskih vlasti. Cilj rada je da se komparativnom analizom identificiraju nedostaci u ustavnoj poziciji i organizaciji lokalne samouprave u Gradu Sarajevu. Rezultati komparativne analize mogu biti od koristi u oblikovanju prijedloga institucionalnog modela reforme i organizacije lokalne samouprave u Gradu Sarajevu.
MODEL IZBORA SKUPŠTINE GRADA, GRADONAČELNIKA I GRADSKOG VEĆA GRADA BEOGRADA U UPOREDNOJ PERSPEKTIVI
MODEL IZBORA SKUPŠTINE GRADA, GRADONAČELNIKA I GRADSKOG VEĆA GRADA BEOGRADA U UPOREDNOJ PERSPEKTIVI
(MODEL OF THE ELECTION OF THE CITY ASSEMBLY, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELGRADE IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE)
- Author(s):Slaviša Orlović
- Language:Serbian
- Subject(s):Public Administration, Government/Political systems, Electoral systems
- Page Range:166-188
- No. of Pages:23
- Keywords:City of Belgrade; City assembly; Mayor; City Council; City administration; City municipalities;
- Summary/Abstract:In this text, I deal with the analysis of the election model of the city assembly, mayor, city council and city municipalities in the City of Belgrade in a comparative perspective. In the introductory part, I point out the theoretical assumptions of local self-government and democracy. Then I look back at European experiences, principles and trends such as subsidiarity, decentralization and regionalism. The city of Belgrade is located within the territorial organization of the Republic of Serbia. In the central part of this work, I deal with the organization of the authorities in Belgrade and the method of elections. The way city authorities are elected affects the character of the local self-government system. Voters evaluate the quality of work of the local self-government as a whole by the work of the first person of the local community. Citizens in the person of the president of the municipality and the mayor personalize the local government – he is the address they turn to for all the problems they have and they expect solutions from him even when the problems are not within the competence of the local administration. He is not only the first among equals, but the local government from which the citizens expect to be operational. Serbia’s experience with the direct election of mayors (2004) produced negative consequences. In dualistic systems presidents of municipalities and mayors depended on the parliamentary majority in the implementation of local politics. Where the parties of the majority in local assemblies and municipal presidents and mayors differed, the work of local self-government was blocked and impeachment proceedings were initiated. In contrast, in the monist system that has been in effect in Belgrade since 2008, the mayor and the city council are subordinate to the representative body of the local community and their actions are conditioned by the will of the majority. It can be concluded that local governments have two “innate advantages” over national states in managing global issues: they have greater legitimacy among those they represent, and they have more flexibility and room for maneuver than national structures. At the same time, the cities are home to a huge concentration of power and wealth, but also great inequalities and poverty.
RAZVOJ GRADA SARAJEVA
RAZVOJ GRADA SARAJEVA
(THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF SARAJEVO)
- Contributor(s):Mehmed Bublin (Editor)
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Politics, Governance, Social development, Rural and urban sociology, Economic development
- Page Range:191-213
- No. of Pages:23
- Keywords:City of Sarajevo; space; time; development; system; management;
- Summary/Abstract:It has long been said and written that cities that have their own past have a soul. The past of Sarajevo goes back (as research has shown) to 3000 BC, when Neolithic man lived in this area in the so-called settlements of the Butmir culture. On its development path from the Neolithic settlement to the metropolis, Sarajevo developed through Illyrian fortifications, the Roman settlement on Ilidža Aquae…S with Roman roads that crossed in the Sarajevo area, the medieval city of Hodidjeda on Vratnik, the oriental city along the river Miljacka, a city with a central European character from the twentieth century and the new part of the city developed along the river Miljacka to Ilidža. The city developed at the junction of the roads in its area by the source of the Bosna River (after which the country got its name) and with intense influences from the East and the West. The influences of different cultures had great importance on the feeling for the other and the different and the development of a special spirituality based on multiculturalism. That eternal spirit of Sarajevo, it is the Sarajevo spirit of far-famed tolerance, attention and respect. There are four places of worship, Muslim, Catholic, Orthodox, and Jewish, rising at barely a hundred meters of aerial distance. In a globalized world, the existence and appreciation of different cultures, religions and other differences between people is of fundamental importance for the development of world society. The city of Sarajevo, like the whole of Bosnia, has been a participant in the existence of different cultures and religions in a small space for hundreds of years. Throughout its long history, Sarajevo experienced tragedies such as floods, fires, wars and so on. Sarajevo experienced the greatest tragedy in the period from 1992 to 1995 when it was under siege, with living conditions like in a camp. At that time, most politicians and intellectuals advocated for a unique multi-ethnic Sarajevo. However, with the Dayton Peace Agreement, Sarajevo became an ethnically divided city, and a structure was established that is unknown to any city in Bosnia and Herzegovina, not even one in Europe. Thus, Sarajevo consists of East Sarajevo, Sarajevo Canton, with nine municipalities, and the City of Sarajevo, which spans four municipalities and has very limited jurisdiction. A city divided in this way on ethnic grounds and without the jurisdiction of the city, which exists in European metropolises, is dysfunctional and represents a civilizational shame. The citizens of Sarajevo must find a way to become a city like Europe knows, that is, the civilized world. Unfortunately, the current state of the city in terms of space, organization and functionality is not a current topic for citizens, experts, domestic or foreign politicians. This kind of organization of the city was proposed by the creators of the Dayton Agreement, which is a great surprise, disappointment and incomprehensible for those who are the biggest fighters for human rights, democracy and other civilizational assets. Sarajevo must constitutionally define a political, organizational and functional structure and move towards the development path of European metropolises and build resilience and inclusiveness to the challenges of globalization, climate change, pandemics and new technologies with artificial intelligence. To achieve sustainable development, it is necessary to develop a management structure that includes the formation of an organizational structure with databases, tools, visions, plans, strategies and monitoring. Involvement of citizens, empirical and theoretical solutions to the issue of city development and current trends in the world are the basis for taking adequate measures.
ULOGA GRADA SARAJEVA U RAZVOJU REGIJE - INSTITUCIONALNI I FINANCIJSKI KAPACITET
ULOGA GRADA SARAJEVA U RAZVOJU REGIJE - INSTITUCIONALNI I FINANCIJSKI KAPACITET
(FINANCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY AS A DETERMINANT OF THE ROLE OF THE CITY OF SARAJEVO IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGION)
- Author(s):Jasmina Osmanković, Nataša Pelja Tabori
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Regional Geography, Governance, Political economy, Economic development
- Page Range:214-229
- No. of Pages:16
- Keywords:financial capacity; institutional capacity; City of Sarajevo; role in development; region;
- Summary/Abstract:The paper entitled Financial and Institutional Capacity as a Determinant of the Role of the City of Sarajevo in the Development of the Region was formed based on the invitation of the organizers of the international scientific conference Political-Legal and Legal Position of the City of Sarajevo in the System of Local Self-Government in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The topic was positioned as the sixth last topic within the second part of the conference entitled Socio-economic and spatial-urban assumptions for the development of the City of Sarajevo until 2030. The role of the City of Sarajevo in the development of the Sarajevo Region is determined by the financial and institutional capacity of the City of Sarajevo. This shaped topic reflects the problem of financial and institutional capacity of the City of Sarajevo in the context of its role in the development of the narrower and heavier gravitational environment. Two questions arise in this context. First, what is the financial capacity of the City of Sarajevo comparatively with the capital cities in the region, with the Sarajevo Canton, local self-government units? Secondly, what is the institutional capacity of the City of Sarajevo in the process of strategic planning and management of the development of the narrower and wider gravitational area? The answer to the questions is sought based on comparative analysis. The paper could help in understanding the role of the City of Sarajevo in the development of the administrative and functional-gravity region according city institutional and financial capacity.
SARAJEVO ĆE BITI, SVE DRUGO ĆE PROĆI
SARAJEVO ĆE BITI, SVE DRUGO ĆE PROĆI
(SARAJEVO WILL BE, EVERYTHING ELSE WILL PASS)
- Author(s):Amir Vuk-Zec
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Architecture, Governance, Rural and urban sociology
- Page Range:230-253
- No. of Pages:24
- Keywords:rhizome; networking fluid society; building code; memory of the town; imagination;
- Summary/Abstract:This is theoretical work for better understanding what Sarajevo is today. Since the focus is on contemporary society, our work begins with the concept of the rhizome, which Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari used as a metaphor to explain the nature of knowledge, information, and social relation. This concept applied information age defined in works Manuel Castells. The rise of the networking society, they application in actual life in town. In this work after highlighted some od phenomena of the world today analyzing urban layers in memories of the Sarajevo, from period when Sarajevo establishing, when ottoman empire era rule in Bosnia, Austro-Hungarian period, and rule in the both Jugoslav era and finely, and finely reflex on post-Dayton position like capital town in independent state BIH, and what that happen in space. One part of our analyzing is to discover what kind of the rule was dominate in history of the town. Very important focus in this work is to clear fined definition, what is Sarajevo today, and why this city, lost your competition like town and disappear in concept the Canton Sarajevo. We are try to find reason of that position the town in organization today, and try to give some suggestion, how to find some solution for better thinking about the city region. Today is divided town, and we have to try to find solution for charismatic position in the future of the town. It will be imagination, like tools which help to find light in the end.
REVITALIZIRANJE PREDGRAĐA - POUKE ZA SARAJEVO
REVITALIZIRANJE PREDGRAĐA - POUKE ZA SARAJEVO
(REVITALIZATION OF SUBURBS - LESSONS FOR SARAJEVO)
- Author(s):Ivana Domljan, Vjekoslav Domljan
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Governance, Rural and urban sociology, Economic development
- Page Range:254-272
- No. of Pages:19
- Keywords:knowledge city; knowledge workers; excellency centre; innovation district;
- Summary/Abstract:BIH lags far behind in development of the knowledge society and economy. It has a far smaller number of skilled workers and researchers compared to comparator countries, i.e. small countries of Central and Southeast Europe. Moreover, there are only 144 researchers employed in research and development in the economy. The City of Sarajevo can contribute to its own development and the development of BiH if it positions itself as the main information and communication capital. This can be achieved if the City and its municipalities decide to develop the Sarajevo Innovation District. The first step in this direction could be the establishment of the Council for Promotion of Software Production and Export and the establishment of an information and communication technology and innovation excellency centre. The experience of Ireland in establishing software study centres and India in forming Indian Silicon Valley in Bangalore is of valuable benefit. On this basis, Sarajevo would develop as a strong knowledge city and over time become an international centre for software developers, students and start-ups and as a strong innovation district. Sarajevo would become a city that attracts talent and knowledge workers. This would become a model for the development of other knowledge cities in Bosnia and Herzegovina and contribute to the growth of an upper-middle-income country into a high-income country.
PROSTORNO I URBANISTIČKO PLANIRANJE SARAJEVA – PROŠLOST, SADAŠNJOST, BUDUĆNOST
PROSTORNO I URBANISTIČKO PLANIRANJE SARAJEVA – PROŠLOST, SADAŠNJOST, BUDUĆNOST
(SPATIAL AND URBAN PLANNING OF SARAJEVO - PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE)
- Author(s):Nataša Pelja Tabori, Jasmina Osmanković
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Architecture, Governance, Policy, planning, forecast and speculation, Rural and urban sociology, Economic development
- Page Range:273-287
- No. of Pages:15
- Keywords:spatial planning; urban planning; Sarajevo; urban transformation; institutional and law context; documents;
- Summary/Abstract:The paper on spatial and urban planning was prepared upon the invitation of the organizers of the International scientific conference: Political-legal and statutory position of the City of Sarajevo in the system of local self-government in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The possibility of reforming competencies and territorial organization in 2022. This topic is positioned within the Second unit of the conference entitled Socio-economic and spatial-urban assumptions for the development of the City of Sarajevo until 2030. As its title indicates, the focus is on spatial and urban planning of the City of Sarajevo. Three temporal dimensions presented past, present, and future or urban transformation. Question are: what the key legal and institutional determinants of spatial and urban planning in the last century; at the beginning of the 21st century; and in the years to come, are; which the crucial documents of spatial and urban development are, and finally, what will be the indications of urban transformation by the end of this decade.
ANALIZA REZULTATA PROVEDENOG EMPIRIJSKOG ISTRAŽIVANJA U OKVIRU PROJEKTA USTAVNOPRAVNI I ZAKONSKI POLOŽAJ GRADA SARAJEVA: MOGUĆNOSTI REFORME NADLEŽNOSTI I TERITORIJALNE ORGANIZACIJE
ANALIZA REZULTATA PROVEDENOG EMPIRIJSKOG ISTRAŽIVANJA U OKVIRU PROJEKTA USTAVNOPRAVNI I ZAKONSKI POLOŽAJ GRADA SARAJEVA: MOGUĆNOSTI REFORME NADLEŽNOSTI I TERITORIJALNE ORGANIZACIJE
(ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL POSITION OF THE CITY OF SARAJEVO: POSSIBILITIES OF REFORM OF COMPETENCES AND TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION)
- Author(s):Mirko Pejanović, Elmir Sadiković
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Politics, Constitutional Law, Governance, Government/Political systems
- Page Range:291-303
- No. of Pages:13
- Keywords:Sarajevo; territorial organization; reform; legislation; research results;
- Summary/Abstract:Centar za istraživanje razvoja lokalne i regionalne samouprave Akademije nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine je u okviru priprema za međunarodnu naučnu konferenciju: “Ustavno-pravni i zakonski položaj Grada Sarajeva: mogućnosti reforme nadležnosti i teritorijalne organizacije” proveo empirijsko istraživanje stavova izabranih vijećnika Gradskog vijeća Grada Sarajeva i vijećnika u šest opština u Kantonu Sarajevo. U metodološkom pristupu izbora ispitanika pošlo se od stajališta da su vijećnici šest opština i Gradskog vijeća izabrani na lokalnim izborima 2020. godine najbliži interesima i volji građana Sarajeva i da građani imaju snažnu identifikaciju sa izabranim vijećnicima. Istraživanje je provedeno u periodu od 12. do 26. jula 2022. godine. Anketirano je 167 opštinskih / gradskih vijećnika (od ukupno 182 – 91%) u četiri gradske opštine: Stari Grad, Centar, Novo Sarajevo i Novi Grad, vijećnici u opštinama Ilidža i Vogošća te vijećnici Gradskog vijeća Grada Sarajeva. Strukturu anketnog upitnika činilo je 11 pitanja. Pitanja su koncipirana tako da su obuhvatala tri najvažnija aspekta ustavno-pravnog položaja Grada Sarajeva. Prva skupina pitanja odnosila se na stavove vijećnika prema sadašnjoj ustavnoj poziciji Grada Sarajeva i podjeli nadležnosti u vršenju javnih poslova između različitih nivoa organizacije vlasti (opštinske / gradske / kantonalne).
RATNI GRADONAČELNIK SARAJEVA (1994-1996): ESEJ O SARAJEVU U VREMENU OPSADE
RATNI GRADONAČELNIK SARAJEVA (1994-1996): ESEJ O SARAJEVU U VREMENU OPSADE
(WARTIME MAYOR OF SARAJEVO (1994-1996): ESSAY ON SARAJEVO DURING THE SIEGE)
- Author(s):Tarik Kupusović
- Language:Bosnian
- Subject(s):Politics, Governance, Military history, Political history, Transformation Period (1990 - 2010), Wars in Jugoslavia
- Page Range:304-326
- No. of Pages:23
- Keywords:Sarajevo; 90s; war; governance; major; Tarik Kupusović;
- Summary/Abstract:Građani Sarajeva su kroz historiju prošli svašta, sve što se može proći u 560 godina. Većina nas živo pamti prve višestranačke izbore nakon doba socijalizma, koji se održavaju po tadašnjim socijalističkim republikama, u Bosni i Hercegovini 18. 11. 1990.