ПРОВЕРКА ЗА ПЛАГИАТСТВО ПО ЗАКОНА ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ НА АКАДЕМИЧНИЯ СЪСТАВ ИЛИ ДОКАЗВАНЕ НА ПРЕСТЪПЛЕНИЕТО „ПЛАГИАТСТВО” ПО НАКАЗАТЕЛНИЯ КОДЕКС – ДОПУСТИМА ЛИ Е АЛТЕРНАТИВА ПО БЪЛГАРСКОТО ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛСТВО?
CHECK FOR PLAGIARISM UNDER THE ACADEMIC STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACT OR PROOF OF THE CRIME ‘PLAGIARISM’ UNDER THE CRIMINAL CODE – IS AN ALTERNATIVE UNDER BULGARIAN LEGISLATION ADMISSIBLE?
Author(s): Veselina ManevaSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, History of Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Canon Law / Church Law, EU-Legislation, Commercial Law, Court case, Comparative Law, Administrative Law, Labour and Social Security Law
Published by: Софийски университет »Св. Климент Охридски«
Keywords: Intangibles; plagiarism; crime; forced co-authorship; court procedure; administrative procedure; consequences, sanctions
Summary/Abstract: The legal framework of plagiarism as a crime, finds its systematic place in Roman law. In the objective Bulgarian law, it is regulated by the first Penal Code in 1896. The current legal framework creates ambiguity regarding the application of the administrative provisions of the Academic Staff Development Act and the Penal Code. The article analyzes the provisions of the two normative acts, as well as the canceled Law on Scientific Degrees and Scientific Titles. The relevant procedures, the competence of the bodies and the consequences of the issued acts are considered. The conclusions justifiably raise the question: is this alternative acceptable?
Journal: IUS ROMANUM
- Issue Year: 2020
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 708-720
- Page Count: 13
- Language: Bulgarian