Kolizyjnoprawna problematyka skuteczności przelewu wierzytelności wobec osób trzecich. Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z dnia 9 października 2019 r. w sprawie BGL BNP Paribas SA c/a TeamBank AG Nürnberg (C‑548/18)
The conflict of laws issues concerning the third party effects of the assignments of claims
The gloss to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 9 October 2019 in the case of BGL BNP Paribas SA v. TeamBank AG Nürnberg (C‑548/18)
Author(s): Witold KurowskiSubject(s): Civil Law, International Law, Court case
Published by: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego
Keywords: the conflict of laws; the assignments; the third-party effects of assignment; the law applicable to the proprietary effects of assignments; the contractual obligations; Rome I Regulation
Summary/Abstract: The question of the law applicable to the third-party effects of assignments of claims is widely discussed in the doctrinal debates. In common opinion, the existing European conflict-of-laws regulations do not provide for a rule governing this issue. In the case BGL BNP Paribas SA v. TeamBank AG Nürnberg (C‑548/18), the Court of Justice of the European Union confirmed this gape of the Rome I Regulation. The gloss presents the justification of the European Union Court’s judgment, the reasons for the lack of the uniform conflict-of-laws regulation, and the consequences of this state. It also analyses briefly the European Commission’s proposal for the EU Regulation concerning the law applicable to the third-party effects of assignments of claims (COM(2018) 96 final), as a response to this situation. Finally, it examines the appropriate conflict-of-laws rules for proprietary effects of assignments of claims (the law of the assignor’s habitual residence and the law of the assigned claim).
Journal: Problemy Prawa Prywatnego Międzynarodowego
- Issue Year: 2020
- Issue No: 26
- Page Range: 223-236
- Page Count: 14
- Language: Polish