HOTĂRÂREA CJUE ÎN CAUZA C-80/19: PRECIZĂRI PRIVIND INTERPRETAREA REGULAMENTULUI (UE) NR. 650/2012 (II)
[CJEU’S JUDGMENT IN CASE C-80/19: CLARIFICATIONS ON THE INTERPRETATION OF REGULATION (EU) 650/2012 (II)]
Author(s): Silviu Dorin ŞchiopuSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Civil Law
Published by: Universul Juridic
Keywords: Regulation (EU) 650/2012; preliminary ruling; succession; habitual residence; notary; national certificate of succession; choice of law; express acceptance of the jurisdiction of the seized court;
Summary/Abstract: This short study aims to provide a prima facie presentation of CJEU’s Judgment in Case C-80/19 which brings some clarifications particularly on the notion of habitual residence, the legal qualification of the national certificate of succession issued by a (Lithuanian) civil-law notary, the jurisdiction on the succession, the express acceptance of the jurisdiction of the seized court, the applicable law and not the least the scope of Regulation (EU) 650/2012. Also prior to this judgment CJEU considered that, in principle, civil law notaries don’t exercise judicial functions. CJEU’s Judgment in Case C-80/19 confirms this case-law at least for Lithuanian notaries when issuing national certificates of succession.
Journal: Universul Juridic
- Issue Year: 2020
- Issue No: 09
- Page Range: 86-98
- Page Count: 13
- Language: Romanian
