COMPATIBILITATEA DINTRE ACŢIUNEA PENALĂ ŞI ACŢIUNEACIVILĂ EXERCITATĂ ÎN CADRUL PROCESULUI PENAL ÎMPOTRIVA INCULPATULUI TRIMIS ÎN JUDECATĂ PENTRU SĂVÂRŞIREA INFRACŢIUNII DE UZ DE FALS. NOTĂ CRITICĂ A DECIZIEI NR. 229/A PRONUNŢATE DE CURTEA DE APEL
THE COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN THE CRIMINAL ACTION AND CIVILACTION EXERCISED IN THE CRIMINAL TRIAL AGAINST THE DEFENDANT ACCUSED OF USE OF FORGERY. ANALYSIS OF COMPULSORY JURISPRUDENCE. CRITICAL OPINION OF THE DECISION NO. 229/A DELIVERED

Summary/Abstract: This analysis wants to focus on the controversial matter of the admissibility of a civil action in a criminal case when the trial is about an offence marked by the lack of materiality in the immediate result, more specifically the use of forgery. Also, the paper presents and analyses the compulsory jurisprudence of the High Court of Cassation and Justice in the matter of the connection between criminal and civil action exercised in the criminal trial as presented in the Decision no. 229/A of the Court of Appeal Timisoara in which the civil action was rejected as inadmissible.

• Details
• Contents