REFLECTIONS UPON THE SANCTIONING TREATMENT OF THE INTERMEDIATE PLURALITY APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUALS. RULING NO. 7/2020 – REASONING, IMPLICATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES Cover Image

REFLECȚII PRIVIND TRATAMENTUL SANCȚIONATOR AL PLURALITĂȚII INTERMEDIARE APLICABIL PERSOANEI FIZICE. DECIZIA NR. 7/2020 – RAȚIUNE, IMPLICAȚII ȘI PERSPECTIVE
REFLECTIONS UPON THE SANCTIONING TREATMENT OF THE INTERMEDIATE PLURALITY APPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUALS. RULING NO. 7/2020 – REASONING, IMPLICATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Author(s): George Pelican
Subject(s): Criminal Law
Published by: Editura Solomon
Keywords: intermediate plurality; sanctioning treatment; concurrence of offences; controversy; appeal in the interest of the law;

Summary/Abstract: This article aims to detail, as well as to clarify, without having the unrealistic expectation to be regardedas an exhaustively documented analysis, the considerable controversy among the published legal literature andthe national jurisprudence under the former legislation and also after the entry into force of the new CriminalCode, caused by the issue regarding the criminal treatment of the intermediate plurality of offences applicableto individuals. In the context of the recent Decision in the interest of the law, this article has the the purposeof revealing the reasoning behind the Ruling no. 7/2020, but also to express a critical perspective on the newreconfiguration of the legal institution regarding intermediate plurality of offences.

  • Issue Year: 2020
  • Issue No: 1
  • Page Range: 45-53
  • Page Count: 9
  • Language: Romanian