Why Managers Want to Be Mentors? The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation and the Anticipated Costs of Mentoring for the Propensity to Mentor by Managers in Formal Mentoring in Organizations Cover Image

Why Managers Want to Be Mentors? The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation and the Anticipated Costs of Mentoring for the Propensity to Mentor by Managers in Formal Mentoring in Organizations
Why Managers Want to Be Mentors? The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation and the Anticipated Costs of Mentoring for the Propensity to Mentor by Managers in Formal Mentoring in Organizations

Author(s): Wioletta Małota
Subject(s): Business Economy / Management, Socio-Economic Research
Published by: Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
Keywords: motivational factors to mentor; cost of mentoring; cognitive patterns of deciding to mentor; manager as mentor

Summary/Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of the research was to find out the correlation between the motivation and costsof internal or external locus of control and the propensity to mentor. Investment of time and personal energy was regarded as factors with an internal locus of control, whereas a lack of mentee’sachievement, problems caused by a mentee, unhealthy or unfriendly relation, and a risk to be replacedby a mentee were regarded as factors with an external locus of control. In the case of internal factors,their locus of control is the mentor him/herself while, in external factors, their locus is outside ofthe mentor and lies in a situation or an environment.Methodology: A quantitative cross-sectional study among Polish managers.Findings: First, the results show that uniquely intrinsic motivation relates to the propensity to mentor, while extrinsic motivation has no importance. Second, before deciding to mentor, managersestimate the costs of mentoring: the higher they are the lower the propensity to mentor. Third, thecosts related to the internal locus of control – time and personal energy invested by a mentor in mentoring – are most important when deciding to mentor. The risk of destroying a mentor’s reputation,problems caused by a mentee, unfriendly or unhealthy relationship and a risk to be replaced bya mentee emerged as of little importance. Fourth, previous experience as a mentor or mentee positively influences the propensity to mentor.Value: The study contributes to existing research, theory, and practice in the field of organizationalbehavior in the context of mentoring. The findings shed light on decision patterns in managers’ propensity to mentor and thoroughly explore the role of the anticipated cost of mentoring

  • Issue Year: 27/2019
  • Issue No: 2
  • Page Range: 64-82
  • Page Count: 19
  • Language: English