Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z 12 kwietnia 2018 r. II KK 411/17
Commentary to the Supreme Court decision of 12 April 2018 II KK 411/17
(the subject of a crime stated in Article 300 § 2 of the Polish Criminal Code)
Author(s): Ivan SmanioSubject(s): Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence, Criminal Law, Court case
Published by: Polska Akademia Umiejętności / Krakowski Instytut Prawa Karnego Fundacja
Keywords: crimes against business transactions;obstruction of the satisfaction of creditor’s claims; action pauliana; joint perpetration; individualization of responsibility;
Summary/Abstract: The author of the commentary critically refers to the thesis of the Supreme Court that criminally liable on the basis of Article 300 § 2 of the Polish Criminal Code (k.k.) is not only a personal debtor but also a person liable to the creditor materially (material debtor). Referring to the second thesis of the Supreme Court, the author of the commentary indicates that a third party within the meaning of Article 527 of the Polish Civil Code (k.c.) due to the lack of a contractual tie with the creditor cannot be classified as a “debtor” for the purposes of Article 300 § 2 k.k. In the author’s opinion, the extraneus figure is an alternative way for assigning to a third party within the meaning of Article 527 k.c. the criminal liability for an offense under Article 300 § 2 k.k. without the need to extend the term “debtor” as was done in the commented judgment.
Journal: Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych
- Issue Year: 23/2019
- Issue No: 1
- Page Range: 187-195
- Page Count: 9
- Language: Polish