The Competence of a Conservation Body to Issue a Construction Permit Based on Law Amending the Act on the Protection of Monuments and the Guardianship of Monuments, Article 45, Section 1 versus a Determination of Monument Status – A Case Study Cover Image

Kompetencje organu konserwatorskiego do wydania decyzji na podstawie art. 45 ust. 1 ustawy o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami a wpis do rejestru – analiza przypadku
The Competence of a Conservation Body to Issue a Construction Permit Based on Law Amending the Act on the Protection of Monuments and the Guardianship of Monuments, Article 45, Section 1 versus a Determination of Monument Status – A Case Study

Author(s): Dominika Kostrzewa
Subject(s): Cultural history, Constitutional Law, Evaluation research
Published by: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
Keywords: construction permit; monument registration; conservation body; construction work; conservation permit;

Summary/Abstract: The II OSK 3/15 verdict of the Polish Supreme Administrative Court, dated 18 October 2016, is concerned with the Law Amending the Act on the Protection of Monuments and the Guardianship of Monuments, Article 36, Section 1, Clause 1; and Article 45, Section 1, Clause 1 and 2. In its verdict of 18 October 2016, the Supreme Administrative Court clearly indicated the consequences of registering a building as a monument even after the prior issue of a construction permit and commencement of construction work on the property. The court further pointed out the conservation body’s lack of a proper analysis of the problem in their justification.

  • Issue Year: 4/2018
  • Issue No: 1
  • Page Range: 107-118
  • Page Count: 12
  • Language: Polish