Legal qualification and legal status of the court costs. A rigorous or relaxed approach? Cover Image
  • Price 4.90 €

Calificarea juridică și regimul juridic al cheltuielilor de judecată. O abordare riguroasă sau relaxată?
Legal qualification and legal status of the court costs. A rigorous or relaxed approach?

Author(s): Cristian Tănasă
Subject(s): Civil Law
Published by: Uniunea Juriștilor din România
Keywords: court costs; legal regime; Civil Procedure Code; Plenum of the Supreme Court; compensation;

Summary/Abstract: Over time, the claim for awarding legal costs in the civil trial has not been paid due attention. Starting with 1959, following a decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Tribunal, in the practice of the courts, as well as in the specialized works has been taken over automatically, until it has been imprinted in the collective mind, the idea that the court costs can be claimed at any time until the debates are closed on the merits, and the court may even draw attention to this issue, or they may be claimed separately, even if they were initially requested within the dispute.The present study aims to analyze the legal status of awarding the claim for costs, while giving at the same time the correct legal classification of this claim by reference to the texts of the Civil Procedure Code. Thus, we will show that this claim brought to the justice can not be subject to the discretionary will of the parties, but must be circumscribed by the procedural rigors with regard to filing a claim before the court. In the first instance, the party must accordingly request court costs, respectively by way of introductory application, an objection, an intervention, etc. If it did not do it, as a rule, it will not be able to claim them within that litigation. If it did it, but then waives their request in the initial litigation, wishing to claim them separately, it will be subject to the consent of the opponent. In the redress or withdrawal means of appeal, claiming the court costs is conditionned twice, both in the compliance claim before the court of first instance and in the compliance claim before each court that has examined the case (by way of appeal, objection, etc.).The practical implications of the study are some of the most spectacular, since the party that does not comply with the procedural rigors of the claim for court costs will either be in a position to promote separate action for their recovery or in the event of a final impossibility to recover, in whole or in part, the advanced court costs.

  • Issue Year: 2019
  • Issue No: 04
  • Page Range: 92-104
  • Page Count: 13
  • Language: Romanian