Kripkean Essentialist Argument and Its Generalization
Kripkean Essentialist Argument and Its Generalization
Author(s): Jaeho LeeSubject(s): Logic, Contemporary Philosophy, Analytic Philosophy
Published by: Filozofický ústav SAV
Keywords: Analyticity; Kripkean essentialist argument; natural kind; necessity a posteriori;
Summary/Abstract: In this paper I examine the argument by H. Beebee and N. Sabbarton-Leary that Brian Ellis’s scientific essentialism is based on the “abuse” of the necessary a posteriori. I will first briefly survey various attempts to resist what I will call the “Kripkean essentialist argument” to locate Beebee’s and Sabbarton-Leary’s position properly. After that I will argue that Beebee’s and Sabbarton-Leary’s argument is not successful; in particular, I will argue that under the most natural interpretation of their position it is not internally coherent, and that their argument is based on a superficial understanding of Kripkean necessity a posteriori.
Journal: Organon F
- Issue Year: 25/2018
- Issue No: 2
- Page Range: 142-154
- Page Count: 13
- Language: English