On Unimaginative Imagination and Conventional Conventions: Response to Lepore and Stone
On Unimaginative Imagination and Conventional Conventions: Response to Lepore and Stone

Summary/Abstract: The article is a response to Lepore and Stone 2015 and offers a critical discussion of their claims that various aspects of discourse meaning can be ascribed to grammar and that the concept of semantic ambiguity can be defended in the light of the current debates on the semantics/pragmatics interface. It also addresses the question of the understanding of conventions and inferences and their place in the above interface. It ends with the claim that the role Lepore and Stone ascribe to grammar cannot be defended.

• Details
• Contents