INTERAKCE MEZI SOUDNÍM DVOREM EVROPSKÉ UNIE A EVROPSKÝM SOUDEM PRO LIDSKÁ PRÁVA VE SVĚTLE ROZSUDKŮ ESLP VE VĚCI AVOTIŅŠ V. LOTYŠSKO: POKRAČOVÁNÍ PŘÍMĚŘÍ NEBO JEN ZDÁNLIVÝ POCIT BEZPEČÍ?
THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE LIGHT OF ECHR JUDGEMENTS CONCERNING AVOTIŠ V. LATVIA: THE CONTINUATION OF A TRUCE OR A SENSE OF FALSE SECURITY

Summary/Abstract: The article is based on the decision of the Grand chamber of the European court of human rights rendered in May 2016 in the case Avotiņš v. Latvia. In this decision, the Grand chamber decided for the first time after the CJCE opinion 2/13 on the future of the equivalent protection doctrine. The Grand chamber confirmed the vivacity of the Bosphorus rule. The text considers whether it could be read between the lines of the decision the possible future signs of the relationship between the European court of human rights and the Court of justice of the European Union when deciding on the possible breach of the Convention by a member state applying an act of the union.

• Details
• Contents